4.0L OHV & SOHC V6 Tech General discussion of 4.0L OHV and SOHC V6 Ford Ranger engines.

Best performance mufflers for 4.0

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 25, 2010
  #1  
cucukid124's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
From: lebanon township, NJ
Best performance mufflers for 4.0

Im lookin for the best performance muffler to put on a 4.0. i hear that borla and magnaflow are pretty good.

Any others?
 
Reply
Old Jan 25, 2010
  #2  
DSFD506's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 704
Likes: 0
From: Anderson, SC
You're gonna get alot of different answers and choices on this one. It's all about what sounds good to you. Personally I only like the sound of Flowmaster on a Ranger.
 
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2010
  #3  
rangerrick's Avatar
Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
From: Columbia NJ
Borla, Magnaflow, and Gibson, have an aggressive sound on V8's, 4.0's aren't going to sound anywhere near as good as say a V8 would sound.
Little confused here kid, didn't you just purchase the F150 like a month or so ago? So why are you selling it now?
 
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2010
  #4  
Alex98's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 949
Likes: 1
From: Baltimore, Maryland
Flowmasters are better for v-8's imo but I have a dynomax super turbo...
 
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2010
  #5  
Ford04Ranger4.0's Avatar
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,390
Likes: 3
From: Plattsburgh, New York
I have the magnaflow full cat back, borlas are sick but the bassani's sound kick a$$...
 
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2010
  #6  
cucukid124's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
From: lebanon township, NJ
Originally Posted by rangerrick
Borla, Magnaflow, and Gibson, have an aggressive sound on V8's, 4.0's aren't going to sound anywhere near as good as say a V8 would sound.
Little confused here kid, didn't you just purchase the F150 like a month or so ago? So why are you selling it now?
part time deli job + 8 MPG + dumb purchase by me = need new solution

and for the mufflers im not looking for overall sound, i really want something that will make it perform better even a cat back system im not basin this off overall sound quality
 
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2010
  #7  
Tys 4x4 FTW's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 6,575
Likes: 2
From: Las Vegas, Nevada
don't go slowmaster. they are restrictive. although do sound great.

i originally had a flowmaster. liked it. but wanted something different. i could actually feel it holding the truck back.

went with a straight through magnaflow muffler. and had custom mandrel bent 2.5" piping from the cat back and i noticed a very small difference in the higher RPM's. not much ,but its something at least. and its dumped right after the muffler . sounds great.
 
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2010
  #8  
cucukid124's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
From: lebanon township, NJ
magnaflow is in the top for me, you felt the difference even with the 35's?
 
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2010
  #9  
rangerrick's Avatar
Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
From: Columbia NJ
Thats actually pretty good, 8 mpg with those size tires. Those trucks have a thirsty appetite to start with. Fuel ecnomy got a little better after 02, but not by that much. I get 9-10mpg with my 8.1.

You won't notice any performance gains with the 4.0 by doing the exhaust, you want performance gains you go with a super charger, that is if you have the $$$$ for it. If you like the look of a performance exhaust, then go with stainless steal mandrell bent T -304, other wise you are wasting your money by not choosing a SS system, cause they will last only about 4 years tops. My friend has a gibson on his 2500 and you can definately feel the gains with it. The muffler itself is as big as the stock muffler if not slightly bigger and has all mandrel bends. Very good cat back system.
 
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2010
  #10  
evilclown312's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,772
Likes: 1
From: Logan ohio
I have the magnaflow on my truck and love it! I would never put a Flowmaster on my truck!
 
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2010
  #11  
cucukid124's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
From: lebanon township, NJ
ya rick i hear ya, i guess im just lookin for simple mods once i get it nothin major yet thanks though for the advise, you been wheelin lately?
 
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2010
  #12  
brianjwilson's Avatar
Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,650
Likes: 2
From: Hillsboro, Oregon
I don't think you'll get much performance out of exhaust on a ranger either, but I would go with a straight through magnaflow. Magnaflow sounds great and is not restrictive like flowmaster.
I had a magnaflow catback on a VR6 (2.8L) Jetta and now on a 2.5L turbo Subaru, they both sound awesome.
 
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2010
  #13  
cucukid124's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
From: lebanon township, NJ
i guess now the question is, whats the best for gas milage? haha
 
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2010
  #14  
--weezl--'s Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,139
Likes: 1
From: Calgary AB, Canada
Originally Posted by Tys 4x4 FTW
don't go slowmaster. they are restrictive. although do sound great.

i originally had a flowmaster. liked it. but wanted something different. i could actually feel it holding the truck back.

went with a straight through magnaflow muffler. and had custom mandrel bent 2.5" piping from the cat back and i noticed a very small difference in the higher RPM's. not much ,but its something at least. and its dumped right after the muffler . sounds great.
what differences are we talking, mpg wise? like a 1mpg loss?
 
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2010
  #15  
07Sport4x4's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
From: Mount Vernon, WA
I find 4.0L and great fuel economy to not be very compatible. Proper/good tire pressure made the most noticable gains for me . . . and it cost me nothing.
 
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2010
  #16  
Melt's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,392
Likes: 2
From: Denver, CO
straight pipe it!
 
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2010
  #17  
KLC's Avatar
KLC
RF Veteran
iTrader: (29)
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 13,115
Likes: 5
From: New Mexico
Go with Magnaflow.

Originally Posted by 07Sport4x4
I find 4.0L and great fuel economy to not be very compatible. Proper/good tire pressure made the most noticable gains for me . . . and it cost me nothing.
I consistently get 16-17 MPG in the city. Pretty good if you ask me.
 
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2010
  #18  
--weezl--'s Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,139
Likes: 1
From: Calgary AB, Canada
over 1300 miles, i averaged 16.6 mpg, but have gotten as high as 23mpg on some tanks (not used in the calculation of the 16.6)

i don't particularly want to lose the mileage that i do get... but 1-2 mpg is less than i can lose by driving habits for less than 1/4 of my tank...
 
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2010
  #19  
cucukid124's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
From: lebanon township, NJ
i got 15 with the 95 i had 4x4 ill be lookin to put 32's on it and maybe 4:10's so she dont be laggin everywhere, the new truck i mean
 
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2010
  #20  
Melt's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,392
Likes: 2
From: Denver, CO
Originally Posted by KLC
Go with Magnaflow.



I consistently get 16-17 MPG in the city. Pretty good if you ask me.
the ohv 4.0s get worse mileage than the sohc's
 
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2010
  #21  
Tys 4x4 FTW's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 6,575
Likes: 2
From: Las Vegas, Nevada
Originally Posted by --weezl--
what differences are we talking, mpg wise? like a 1mpg loss?
im saying i felt the diffrence in the seat of my pants
 
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2010
  #22  
brianjwilson's Avatar
Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,650
Likes: 2
From: Hillsboro, Oregon
Originally Posted by Melt
the ohv 4.0s get worse mileage than the sohc's
I could get 18mpg in our old 97 ex 4x4 with stock tires on the highway. Not all that bad depending on driving technique.
 
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2010
  #23  
KLC's Avatar
KLC
RF Veteran
iTrader: (29)
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 13,115
Likes: 5
From: New Mexico
Originally Posted by Melt
the ohv 4.0s get worse mileage than the sohc's
The person who I quoted has an SOHC.
 
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2010
  #24  
--weezl--'s Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,139
Likes: 1
From: Calgary AB, Canada
Originally Posted by Tys 4x4 FTW
im saying i felt the diffrence in the seat of my pants
you felt a loss of power in the seat of your pants?
 
Reply
Old Jan 26, 2010
  #25  
rangerrick's Avatar
Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
From: Columbia NJ
Originally Posted by cucukid124
ya rick i hear ya, i guess im just lookin for simple mods once i get it nothin major yet thanks though for the advise, you been wheelin lately?
No, i missed the last few trips my buddies went to in PA. Some of them are way to ballsy and will go out on the ice and do donuts and what not. They don't realize if that ice cracks their trucks and perhaps their lives are at stake cause some of those quarry lakes are deeeep. I don't take my trucks out on the ice, at least not ice that has deeper water then my tires. You want some serious mud to play it, you go to Treverton PA. They have miles or mud holes to play in.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:10 AM.