Is it better ? - Ranger-Forums - The Ultimate Ford Ranger Resource

8-Cylinder Tech If you are one of the few with a V8 engine in your Ranger, or if you dream of a Ranger with a V8 engine, this is the sub-forum for you.

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-07-2005
Unique458's Avatar
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Cap-pele N.B. Canada
Posts: 36
Is it better ?

I currently am installing a 302 in my 94 splash, the motor comes from a 88 stang lx ( speed density ).

I have a chance to trade the remaining of the stang, for the parts needed to convert to mass air, should i ?

the stang is not much good for parts except for tranny - rearend - rims, and other few nick nacks.

I was woundering from all of you with experience, is it worth the effort for the conversion parts?

If i wan't to modify ( more HP ) will i be able to do this more easily with mass air, then speed density? Is 300 HP achievable with little effort? Or am i wasting my time - money - and effort ?

I was thinking that in the future i would like to put in a supercharger, and wondered if the cpu will adjust the fuel/air mix or will i have to get another cpu program?

Thanks in advance
Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2005
Level III Supporter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: usa
Posts: 24,936
YES......YES.....i hate my speed density ranger...
Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2005
FoMoCoFiddy's Avatar
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Smackdownville Tx
Posts: 4,508
um, you can get a mass air harness, and computer(A9L) for less than 200 on ebay...

In my opinion, the tranny rear and body are worth more than that.

Mass air is only necessary really if you plan on adding a cam and power adders.

Speed Density is fine with bolt ons, i have full exhaust and upper intake on my speed density fox.

If you plan on adding a cam and a supercharger or turbo, then go for it, if not.. not worth it.

EDIT: To add to my post.

300 rwhp is not easy with just bolt ons. ive seen foxs go high 11's and low 12's with bolt ons.

If you do supercharger, then go mass air.

You can get the computer (A9L), harness, maf, and tube for the intake on ebay , like i said.

As for tuning, you can tune the A9L comp, but, aftemarket computers, are like 300 at most... which would allow better tuning, if i ever go mass air, im not gonna go A9L, im going aftermarket, in the end, its cheaper..

When your doing things like changing mass air flow sensors, there tends to be, alot of having to tune the maf for the injectors.. stockers are 19lb i think.

I would personally sell the car as a roller, and go with a aftermarket comp.
Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2005
optikal illushun's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Coal Region, MTC to be exact...heart of the coal region.
Posts: 2,232
right, speed density isnt bad at all. a lot of the gen 1 lightning guys went to mass air then back to speed density. pick ur poison i guess. just get a chip burned and the SD will be fine.
Reply With Quote

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
another tornado rip or sumthing better? loneFX4 New Ideas 16 07-16-2005 10:40 PM
What will sound better jtslmn720 Audio & Video Tech 5 05-19-2005 11:43 AM
better buy for my driving habits...??? afi_pilot85 Drivetrain Tech 2 04-29-2005 02:53 PM
wider is better right? help me decide... TippnOver Wheels & Tires Semi-Tech 6 12-12-2004 07:26 PM
Driveline failure! -- ALL BETTER NOW! n3elz Drivetrain Tech 28 11-12-2004 11:46 AM

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:58 PM.

We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to and affiliated sites.