8-Cylinder Tech If you are one of the few with a V8 engine in your Ranger, or if you dream of a Ranger with a V8 engine, this is the sub-forum for you.

V-8 Swap Homework - HELP

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 3, 2008
  #1  
jaycheetwood's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,218
Likes: 0
From: Ogden, Utah
V-8 Swap Homework - HELP

So i have been reading up on some swaps for my 2003 Ranger.


Can i use the 4.6 L V-8 used in an 03 Ford Explorer?

If so its shown with a manual tranny option??

http://www.explorerforum.com/ntrprize/spec2003.htm


This is where my information is coming from on this.

My questions:

What engine?

What transmission?

What year Donor?

Can i use 5.0 or should i stay 4.6??
 
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2008
  #2  
04blackedge's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (13)
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 23,426
Likes: 8
From: Durham, NC
I haven't heard of someone using the 4.6, not saying it hasn't happened its just not a popular swap. 5.0 is much easier.
 
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2008
  #3  
jaycheetwood's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,218
Likes: 0
From: Ogden, Utah
what about this?

http://www.ksl.com/?nid=218&ad=4619840&cat=103&lpid=1
 
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2008
  #4  
04blackedge's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (13)
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 23,426
Likes: 8
From: Durham, NC
It kinda looks like what rwenzing has on his 5.0
 
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2008
  #5  
jaycheetwood's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,218
Likes: 0
From: Ogden, Utah
Yeah except its a turbo not an S/C...
 
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2008
  #6  
04blackedge's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (13)
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 23,426
Likes: 8
From: Durham, NC
Oh I didn't look that hard, it sure is
 
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2008
  #7  
99ranger4x4's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 12,198
Likes: 3
From: Austin, TX
the 4.6 is a 90º V? and the 5.0 is less, than that there for the engine is narrower..

you CAN fit a 4.6 in there, hell the 6.0 PSD fits.. but you're going to have to do a lot more fabbing.. the 5.0 is more of a drop in and swap some wiring and plumb is.. (of course its not that easy, but it wont requite cutting and welding major stuff)
 
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2008
  #8  
Jp7's Avatar
Jp7
Member
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,028
Likes: 17
From: N/A
Why not just turbocharge your current engine and have a more powerful more efficient engine.
 
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2008
  #9  
redranger4.0's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Firey depths
5.3L Trailblazer motor.
 
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2008
  #10  
Melt's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,392
Likes: 2
From: Denver, CO
dont you have a 4l thats pulling 23mpg hwy? Why anyone would want to give that up i dont know.
 
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2008
  #11  
jaycheetwood's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,218
Likes: 0
From: Ogden, Utah
Originally Posted by Melt
dont you have a 4l thats pulling 23mpg hwy? Why anyone would want to give that up i dont know.
Yeah i run 21 - 23 mpg at 77mph.. and im not sure what mpg at 55mph.. i would guess more..

I am thinking power and offroading.

Originally Posted by Jp7
Why not just turbocharge your current engine and have a more powerful more efficient engine.

Has anyone ever turbo'ed a 4.0L?? Alot of custom exhaust fabbing??


Originally Posted by 99ranger4x4
the 4.6 is a 90º V? and the 5.0 is less, than that there for the engine is narrower..

Hmm I think you are correct.. i had just read the motor had to come out of a similiar year vehicle..

Do they even make the 5.0L EFI anymore??


you CAN fit a 4.6 in there, hell the 6.0 PSD fits.. but you're going to have to do a lot more fabbing.. the 5.0 is more of a drop in and swap some wiring and plumb is.. (of course its not that easy, but it wont requite cutting and welding major stuff)
Originally Posted by 04blackedge
Oh I didn't look that hard, it sure is
Hehe yeah that looks fun a 5.0l t/c.. my fear is weight ratios with the turbo... rx-7 vs ranger.. big weight change.
 
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2008
  #12  
Melt's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,392
Likes: 2
From: Denver, CO
Originally Posted by jaycheetwood
Yeah i run 21 - 23 mpg at 77mph.. and im not sure what mpg at 55mph.. i would guess more..

I am thinking power and offroading.
talk to d im sure he has plenty of power and if i remember right you already said you werent thinknig lift cause of the twin stick
 
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2008
  #13  
04blackedge's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (13)
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 23,426
Likes: 8
From: Durham, NC
He wasn't thinking of body lifting
 
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2008
  #14  
jaycheetwood's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,218
Likes: 0
From: Ogden, Utah
Originally Posted by Melt
talk to d im sure he has plenty of power and if i remember right you already said you werent thinknig lift cause of the twin stick
Yeah, hmm ill try to PM him about it. I really rather not boost my 4.0L being 91k miles is pretty high to me...


Originally Posted by 04blackedge
He wasn't thinking of body lifting
YES you are correct BL is not for me.. and neither is an excessive lift.

I want a modest lift that still rides smooth doesnt kill MPG and will allow 33's and some nice movement off-road.. I like the RCD-skyjacker-superlift hybrid hahah.
 
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2008
  #15  
My91Ranger's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,254
Likes: 5
From: Roseville, Michigan
How about giving you 4.0 a little juice (NOS)?
 
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2008
  #16  
jaycheetwood's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,218
Likes: 0
From: Ogden, Utah
Originally Posted by My91Ranger
How about giving you 4.0 a little juice (NOS)?
hmmm wear and tear though??? lots i assume??
 
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2008
  #17  
My91Ranger's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,254
Likes: 5
From: Roseville, Michigan
4.0 on Nitrous Info
 
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2008
  #18  
whippersnapper02's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,415
Likes: 4
From: Earth, Milky Way Galaxy
You want to go fast then get a fast car.
 
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2008
  #19  
jaycheetwood's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,218
Likes: 0
From: Ogden, Utah
Thank you.. I just think a 4.6 or a 5.0 would be a neat swap. I just also fear being at over 91k that i am bound to have issues with my 4.0 soon
 
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2008
  #20  
jaycheetwood's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,218
Likes: 0
From: Ogden, Utah
Originally Posted by fddriver02
You want to go fast then get a fast car.
Haha well why not a fast truck


haha i know were gonna end up back at our GTO talk again here.
 
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2008
  #21  
whippersnapper02's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,415
Likes: 4
From: Earth, Milky Way Galaxy
Originally Posted by jaycheetwood
Haha well why not a fast truck


haha i know were gonna end up back at our GTO talk again here.
A truck wont turn or stop as well as a car. Sure you can spend a crap load of cash but in the end it wont be as good. Also it's not worth trying to get the truck to pass emissions. I'd swap a V8 if I lived in another state but not here. Also I'm not sure what Utah's emissions laws are like.
 
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2008
  #22  
jaycheetwood's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,218
Likes: 0
From: Ogden, Utah
Originally Posted by fddriver02
A truck wont turn or stop as well as a car. Sure you can spend a crap load of cash but in the end it wont be as good. Also it's not worth trying to get the truck to pass emissions. I'd swap a V8 if I lived in another state but not here. Also I'm not sure what Utah's emissions laws are like.

Lucky for utah... we have emission-less counties..

How would it be hard to pass emissions?? it would put out same emissions as if it were in an explorer would it not???

most say 5.0 is straight swap.. except minor things here and there.. and uhh im not sure on the tranny part yet.. i am hoping in spring to get another car.. then m y truck will be my toy.
 
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2008
  #23  
whippersnapper02's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,415
Likes: 4
From: Earth, Milky Way Galaxy
Well a 5.0 would not work in CA at all. It would have to be a 4.6 and you would need all the emissions stuff with it. I haven't really looked into it because I sort of gave up on a v8. Id rather spend the money on a full size with a v8 already.
 
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2008
  #24  
jaycheetwood's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,218
Likes: 0
From: Ogden, Utah
Yeah i would to but i hear that 5.0L really pushes alot of low end power for wheeling which would be fun. i would only consider it if i could keep a manual tranny though.
 
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2008
  #25  
Hanks Rangers's Avatar
Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 821
Likes: 2
From: Sandpoint, ID
i got 166,000 on my 4.0L and its still pulling hard and hasn't had any engine problems. i just don't trust the transmissions in them. the 4.0 is a good engine and will last a long time if you ask me.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:22 PM.