Drivetrain Tech General discussion of drivetrain for the Ford Ranger.

3.0 on 35's with 4.56 or 4.88?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 27, 2010
  #1  
lifted_Mazda01's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 685
Likes: 0
From: Davie, FLA
3.0 on 35's with 4.56 or 4.88?

havin the 3.0 brings me to ask would 4.88 be to high for my truck on 35s or should i do what everyone else and throw a set of 4.56? i do some highway but just got an atv trailer and will tow to hunting property and mudfests, which is like 4+ hours away..... soo an input will work
 
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2010
  #2  
t5cents's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 1
From: Eureka, CA
4.88 hands down
 
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2010
  #3  
KLC's Avatar
KLC
RF Veteran
iTrader: (29)
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 13,115
Likes: 5
From: New Mexico
4.88's
 
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2010
  #4  
ShadowRanger08's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,694
Likes: 1
From: Ontario, Canada
id say at least 4.88s. it what i was going to go with if i ever got around to putting on 35s (clearly thats not going to happen anymore tho)
 
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2010
  #5  
brianjwilson's Avatar
Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,650
Likes: 2
From: Hillsboro, Oregon
I would say 4.88s even with a 4.0L.
 
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2010
  #6  
t5cents's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 1
From: Eureka, CA
honestly when i do 35s im getting 4.88's......and i would get 5.13's if i could for the d35...
 
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2010
  #7  
ShadowRanger08's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,694
Likes: 1
From: Ontario, Canada
I know someones gonna say it, so it may as well be me, Just SAS it and put in 5.13s. haha
 
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2010
  #8  
lifted_Mazda01's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 685
Likes: 0
From: Davie, FLA
2wd, how would it react with 4.88s on 33's for a little bit?
 
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2010
  #9  
Fx4wannabe01's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (23)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 21,721
Likes: 17
From: Boring, Oregon
Thought you were selling it due to expense of replacing parts all the time??????
 
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2010
  #10  
LiftedSplash95's Avatar
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
From: Ontario Canada
Im keeping my 4.10s when i got to 35's....




That should be geared well when the 347 is in there
 
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2010
  #11  
camodown's Avatar
Lost in Nowhere
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,022
Likes: 1
From: Midland, TX
4.88's, end of discussion
 
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2010
  #12  
ranger4.0's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,922
Likes: 2
From: cambridge, ontario
Originally Posted by ShadowRanger08
id say at least 4.88s. it what i was going to go with if i ever got around to putting on 35s (clearly thats not going to happen anymore tho)
i think you should slam yours and throw on 30" rims!!!!!!
 
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2010
  #13  
lifted_Mazda01's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 685
Likes: 0
From: Davie, FLA
alrity 4.88 i go
 
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2010
  #14  
RazorsEDGE's Avatar
There's no lifeguard in the gene pool
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 7,878
Likes: 5
From: New Mexico
Indeed 4.88s is the way to go with 35's and 3.0L.
 
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2010
  #15  
lifted_Mazda01's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 685
Likes: 0
From: Davie, FLA
what is the RPM ranger at different speeds? also can i break them loose at a dead stop or how about power braking?
 
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2010
  #16  
The SuperDookie Ranger's Avatar
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 817
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, Ohio
I don't think it's ganna break them loose with such little power...idk...why you would wanna be doing that with 35's im really not sure, but if your serious you might wanna look into getting a motor that would turn them over.
 
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2010
  #17  
Ranger_Envy's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 845
Likes: 1
From: Newton, Ks
I think you'll want as much gear as you can get. I just 35's on my F150 and with the 3.73's, 5.4 and a programmer I could still feel them sucking the power away. On a 3.0 it would be brutal.
 
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2010
  #18  
dbp02's Avatar
Member
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh
I know it's been said already and you made your choice on 4.88's but I agree fully. I'm struggling on 4.10's with 33's and wish I had the cash for some 4.88's.

How much does that run front and rear and what all is involved -- is there a write up somewhere?
 
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2010
  #19  
Masteratarms93's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 4,685
Likes: 5
From: Goose Creek SC
Originally Posted by lifted_Mazda01
2wd, how would it react with 4.88s on 33's for a little bit?
Woah woah woah. Hold the phone.

You want to run 35s on a 2WD?


Dude, whats the point?

With the money for regearing (if you don't do it yourself) you could be doing an SAS.
 
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2010
  #20  
The SuperDookie Ranger's Avatar
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 817
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, Ohio
Originally Posted by Masteratarms93
Woah woah woah. Hold the phone.



With the money for regearing (if you don't do it yourself) you could be doing an SAS.
Agreed, I think it's just a waste of your time and money trying to do this with a 2wd, I would put the money into converting to a 4wd, or sell yours and get a 4wd.
 
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2010
  #21  
Ranger_Envy's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 845
Likes: 1
From: Newton, Ks
Finally people are beginning to see that lifted 2wd's = the Ghey.
 
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2010
  #22  
The SuperDookie Ranger's Avatar
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 817
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, Ohio
exactly, I just don't see the point in lifting a 2wd and putting mud tires and gears when your not ganna be able to go anyway in the mud or snow without 4wd
 
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2010
  #23  
Red_Ak_Ranger's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 17,221
Likes: 4
Gosh maybe cause he likes the look. He says he has an ATV and just wants a little more traction. He didn't say "HURR SO I CAN OFFROAD THE WHOLE RUBICON".
 
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2010
  #24  
The SuperDookie Ranger's Avatar
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 817
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, Ohio
I'm wasn't ******* on him, but making a point. It's a no *** weight RWD truck, so even with bigger tires and gears it's just ganna spin and come out from under him. Sorry for making a point though
 
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2010
  #25  
Red_Ak_Ranger's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 17,221
Likes: 4
Originally Posted by The SuperDookie Ranger
I'm wasn't ******* on him, but making a point. It's a no *** weight RWD truck, so even with bigger tires and gears it's just ganna spin and come out from under him. Sorry for making a point though
You're not really making any point. My truck has no more weight in the rear than a 2wd and i have bigger tires and am in 2wd probably 99% of my driving. Maybe I should sell the bigger tires too?


And if you're talking about the road he's not gonna be spinning out with 35s. And if you're talking about off roading, 4wd is obviously best but that's not to say 2wd isn't good for playing on trails.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:58 PM.