'97 Slave Cylinder vs. '03 Slave Cylinder....what is the difference?
#1
'97 Slave Cylinder vs. '03 Slave Cylinder....what is the difference?
I know the '97 Ranger had a M50D-R1 manual transmission and the '03 Ranger had the M50D-R1HD manual transmission. Are the slave cylinders interchangeable? the only difference I can see from the clutches is the '03 Ranger clutch is 1/8" larger in diameter than the '97 Ranger clutch......they have the same spline count and are the same thickness.....
#3
#4
according to this site, http://www.fordpartsonline.com/ , the slave cylinders are the same......i called them and they cross referenced the parts...
now the only question i have is the clutch....will a '97 clutch work on a '03 transmission?
now the only question i have is the clutch....will a '97 clutch work on a '03 transmission?
#10
#11
#16
#17
My first clutch swap, by dropping the trans, was on my ranger....twice! It wasn't that hard. Nice to have an extra hand to actually pull the trans and put it back in place. Get yourself a chiltons or haynes. And take your time. Just do it yourself for $75 slave, and $200 clutch or $400 spec. The last install, i installed the trans by myself, and pretty sure I bent the disc....an expensive spec disc too. All because my lazy *** little brother wouldn't give me a hand for two minutes. At least I think i bent it because of the chatter when starting from a stop.
#18
Originally Posted by TireIron
yes the 97 clutch will work with the 03 tranny. The input shaft still has the same spline count and same length. I'd stick with all the 97 clutch parts because the flywheel will bolt to your engine and the pressure plate will bolt to that flywheel.
this is the clutch i am looking at getting, is it a decent clutch?:
http://store.summitracing.com/partde...5&autoview=sku
since i don't off road and don't abuse the truck at the track, i think a stock clutch will be fine with the 35's and 4.56 gears......AllanD on TRS also agrees, what do you think Jason?
#19
Honestly, unless you have some SERIOUS modifications to the engine any clutch will do. I've always had good luck with the OEM LUK clutches on my 2.3 but then again a tired old 2.3 could never overpower an undamaged clutch. An organic disk like that is perfect for a daily driven non-raced vehicle as it will perform just right for the temperatures it will see. If you were pulling 350 ft-lbs out of a 4.0L then you might want to start looking into something more heavy duty. As long as the kit comes with the disk, pressure plate, pilot and throwout bearings (some even come with a new slave cyl) then go for it.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post