Drivetrain Tech General discussion of drivetrain for the Ford Ranger.

373's or 410's?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 10-01-2005
MRC's Avatar
MRC
MRC is offline
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Melbourne,FL
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
373's or 410's?

Ok, here is my dilema.After a lot of diagnosing the noise in the rear of my truck I have finally found out what it is.Pinion bearing or bearings.I was hoping for a wheel bearing or carrier bearing as they are much easier to change.No such luck.My friend at the dealer told me I might as well change out the ring and pinion because they have over 70K on them.I have 410's in there now and am not very happy with them.I have 255/70/16 tires.Originally I had 225/70/15's with 355 gears.I don't really want to go back to the 355's because I know it will be a slug(more than it already is) but I don't like the 410's on the highway.I am at 3,000 rpm at 80mph.I have the 4.0 OHV so it doesn't like to rev like a SOHC.That leaves me with 373's.Does anyone have a combo like this and if so how do you like it.One of the main reasons I want the 410's out is that it really didn't help the truck as much as I thought it would over the 355's.I even ran it at the track and it didn't make any difference,maybe even slower.My truck has never gotten good gas mileage and I wouldn't expect it to improve much but every little bit helps.I do about 70% city driving and 30% highway.
 
  #2  
Old 10-01-2005
Wowak's Avatar
Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Merritt Island, FL
Posts: 2,223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
4.56.
 
  #3  
Old 10-01-2005
n3elz's Avatar
RF Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Kennett Square, PA
Posts: 10,623
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
lol!

Hey, if you're unhappy with the 4.10's on the highway, and losing a bit of acceleration/take off torque doesn't matter, 3.73 sounds about right to me. Doesn't that take you back to the effective ratio of a 3.55 with your original tires? Close, I should think.
 
  #4  
Old 10-01-2005
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Coal Region, MTC to be exact...heart of the coal region.
Posts: 2,232
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
slow down, why the hell are u going 80 on the highway anyway?
 
  #5  
Old 10-01-2005
n3elz's Avatar
RF Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Kennett Square, PA
Posts: 10,623
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Because...he can.
 
  #6  
Old 10-01-2005
Wowak's Avatar
Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Merritt Island, FL
Posts: 2,223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by optikal illushun
slow down, why the hell are u going 80 on the highway anyway?
The posted limit on I95 down here is 70, and the average speed of traffic is between 80 and 85. I routinely cruise at 82-83mph myself.
 
  #7  
Old 10-01-2005
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Coal Region, MTC to be exact...heart of the coal region.
Posts: 2,232
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
thats crazy, shows how often i get on a crowed interstate.
 
  #8  
Old 10-01-2005
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Somewhere, XYZ
Posts: 4,351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was gonna say, 3k RPM @ ~80 MPH sounds LOW! .. But then I've got the SOHC, 4.10's and ride 31's..

W/ my combo I don't like to exceed 70 MPH EVER, on account of very poor gas mileage. I actually cruise at 65 (our posted limits) a lot if I'm not in a hurry. Doing so, and shifting under 2k RPM in town (read: driving like a grandma!) is letting me nip at 19-20 MPG..

If you're not happy w/ the 4.10's, and weren't w/ the 3.55's for the opposite reason, sounds like 3.73's are the only thing really left. Unless your'e willing to condisder taller tires..
 
  #9  
Old 10-01-2005
n3elz's Avatar
RF Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Kennett Square, PA
Posts: 10,623
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by optikal illushun
thats crazy, shows how often i get on a crowed interstate.
Up where you live, the term "crowded interstate" is an oxymoron!
 
  #10  
Old 10-01-2005
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Coal Region, MTC to be exact...heart of the coal region.
Posts: 2,232
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
heh, that and the highways u need to be skilled at high speed manuvers to avoid the pot holes :wink

i concour with the rest, 3:73s will set ya in the desired range. but remember higher (4:10s) will yield better gas milage in stop n go traffic...
 
  #11  
Old 10-01-2005
MRC's Avatar
MRC
MRC is offline
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Melbourne,FL
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by n3elz
lol!

Hey, if you're unhappy with the 4.10's on the highway, and losing a bit of acceleration/take off torque doesn't matter, 3.73 sounds about right to me. Doesn't that take you back to the effective ratio of a 3.55 with your original tires? Close, I should think.
I would think it would be close.Maybe someone who is much smarter than me could figure out the final drive ratio taking into account tire size.I do remember it drove pretty good with the 355's but with shorter tires.I don't recall it feeling like the engine was going to explode and shower a passing minivan with hot oil when cruising at 80mph like it does now!
 
  #12  
Old 10-02-2005
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Coal Region, MTC to be exact...heart of the coal region.
Posts: 2,232
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
using a generic OD ratio of .80, a mph of ur standard 80 mph a 3:73 gear with ur 255/70/15 (around a 29" tall tire) yields about 2750 rpm and a 3:55 yields 2500...
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
destroyer000
OLD - Engine & Drivetrain
7
06-07-2016 08:05 PM
07xldngrrngr
New Ideas
5
03-21-2012 05:43 PM
Blhde
OLD - Engine & Drivetrain
1
08-14-2010 01:48 AM



Quick Reply: 373's or 410's?



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:48 PM.