Drivetrain Tech General discussion of drivetrain for the Ford Ranger.

switching rear axle question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 1, 2006
  #1  
powermanb3000's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
From: Tallahassee, FL
switching rear axle question

would my truck run any different if i were to switch my 7.5 3.73 open with a 8.8 3.73 LS from a 95 explorer xlt ?
 
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2006
  #2  
KARPE's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,748
Likes: 2
From: Valrico, Fl 33594
no enough that you would notice, except when braking..mmmmmmmmm 4 wheel discs..
 
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2006
  #3  
powermanb3000's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
From: Tallahassee, FL
o, even if its a bigger axel? alrighty
 
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2006
  #4  
n3elz's Avatar
RF Veteran
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 10,623
Likes: 6
From: Kennett Square, PA
Yes, the heavier axle will slow you down a bit. Probably not what you're looking for. You need to have a problem you want to address that an axle change will solve. So: what are you trying to accomplish?

One puts a heavier duty axle in to reduce the chance of breakage; one regears to shift the power to certain speed ranges or to restore the effective ratio after tire size changes and so forth. Simply dropping in a heavier axle with the same ratio is a net loss.
 
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2006
  #5  
Rand's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,189
Likes: 0
From: Barberton,Ohio
Also you would have to deal with hooking up the exploder parking brake. Possible residual pressure problems with the disc brakes, and changing the axle's spring perches and shock mounts.

Rand
 
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2006
  #6  
Gearhead61's Avatar
RF Veteran
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 5,782
Likes: 2
From: College Station, TX
the ex. 8.8 is a touch wider than a ranger 8.8 too i think...
 
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2006
  #7  
Rand's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,189
Likes: 0
From: Barberton,Ohio
1.5" overall , .75" a side if I'm not mistaken.
 
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2006
  #8  
BOB's Avatar
BOB
Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
From: Haltom City , Texas
The downsides are close to the upsides on this one . May have to work on the disc brakes, but you will have disc brakes. I've seen disc brake kits for $400; if you want them , it'd be a good time to get them. Ls, cost varies, but you could save by buying the axle with Ls already , at least $100? Much stronger axles. The parasitic loss due to the extra weight of the parts will be almost unnoticeable. I'd cut the spring perches and shock mounts off a junk rear in a junkyard, and a decent welding shop could weld them on for you, for a reasonable price. If you were building up an axle anyway, this seems to give a good bang for the $.
 
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2006
  #9  
034x4's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 0
From: Acworth, GA
Ahaha the 31 spline 8.8 does not weigh enough to slow you down, even slightly noticeable...

I don't think the 95 explorers had disc brakes, but, I only think, i'm not sure.
 
Reply
Old Mar 2, 2006
  #10  
TireIron's Avatar
Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 790
Likes: 1
From: Methuen, MA
95 and up exploders had disks.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PW01
Oil & Lubrication
29
Jun 17, 2024 01:32 PM
jpsaxnc
General Ford Ranger Discussion
4
Jun 5, 2014 09:04 PM
aiezzi
Drivetrain Tech
4
Jan 20, 2010 03:38 PM
TexasRanger
General Ford Ranger Discussion
3
Dec 7, 2008 04:03 PM
RNGMSTR
DOHC - 2.3L Duratec / Mazda L Engines
28
Jan 26, 2006 05:52 PM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:26 PM.