Forced Induction & N20 Tech General discussion of forced induction and nitrous for the Ford Ranger.

Cold air intakes!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 02-05-2009
yvillanz98's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: youngsville, pa
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cold air intakes!

i was wondering if a cold air intake is worth buying? i have the 3.0

list some intakes for me and pros and cons
 
  #2  
Old 02-05-2009
edgeman4.0's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: All Over
Posts: 1,475
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No! wait... are you off roading alot? or just pavment pounding?

off road = k&n drop in
mall crawler = cai
 
  #3  
Old 02-05-2009
whippersnapper02's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Earth, Milky Way Galaxy
Posts: 7,415
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Stock is a cold air intake. If you want an aftermarket intake get one that is enclosed. An intake alone wont do much anyway.

Search. This has been covered many times.
 
  #4  
Old 02-05-2009
Brian's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Saint Louis, MO
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
  #5  
Old 02-05-2009
yvillanz98's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: youngsville, pa
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
80% pavement 20% dirt roads and off roadin
 
  #6  
Old 02-05-2009
01 ranger 4x4's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Vacaville, CA
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
iether get the volant one that is enclosed or a similar one
or get a k&n drop in and do the airbox mod
 
  #7  
Old 02-05-2009
edgeman4.0's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: All Over
Posts: 1,475
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
k&n drop in then. cheaper than a full cai. and it breathes better than oem.
 
  #8  
Old 02-06-2009
Roddy's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,332
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
no gains over a K&N drop in. Save your money
 
  #9  
Old 02-06-2009
04blackedge's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 23,426
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by edgeman4.0
k&n drop in then. cheaper than a full cai. and it breathes better than oem.
How do you know this? The engine only pulls through as much are as it can handle, unless you are running forced induction or something like that the stock filter will allow more than enough through and you won't have to worry about dirtying up your MAF sensor.
 
  #10  
Old 02-06-2009
wydopnthrtl's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,496
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by 04blackedge
How do you know this? The engine only pulls through as much are as it can handle, unless you are running forced induction or something like that the stock filter will allow more than enough through and you won't have to worry about dirtying up your MAF sensor.

The delta P across a K&N panel filter is less than a stock paper filter. That means less pumping losses to move air across it. I'm not drawing any conclusions... just stating what *possible* gains there are with a K&N panel.

For the original question. I vote for a K&N FIPK kit and add a outerwears prefilter **if** you spend time at elevated rpms. (4000+)
If you don't have the engine that high very often.. don't waste yer money.

Rich
 
  #11  
Old 02-06-2009
yvillanz98's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: youngsville, pa
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i did the little air box mod (removing the snorkel) i think i will drop in a k&n just for more air flow
 
  #12  
Old 02-06-2009
Jp7's Avatar
Jp7
Jp7 is offline
Member
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 3,028
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 14 Posts
Waste of money on a stock engine with a stock tune. Unless you are doing it so it sounds "cool". Listen if you want, but I tune for a living.
 

Last edited by Jp7; 02-06-2009 at 05:37 PM. Reason: I forgot a period
  #13  
Old 02-07-2009
Brian's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Saint Louis, MO
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by wydopnthrtl
The delta P across a K&N panel filter is less than a stock paper filter. That means less pumping losses to move air across it. I'm not drawing any conclusions... just stating what *possible* gains there are with a K&N panel.

For the original question. I vote for a K&N FIPK kit and add a outerwears prefilter **if** you spend time at elevated rpms. (4000+)
If you don't have the engine that high very often.. don't waste yer money.

Rich
I know exactly what you mean about the pressure drop across the filter, but the fact is that the stock intakes are really well designed and you shouldnt mess with them if your truck is stock. Some cars have a ridiculous amount baffles and restrictions and changing the intake set-up is worth it. In our case, it just is not worth it. yes your engine has to work less to pull in the intake air, but the difference is negligible.
 
  #14  
Old 02-07-2009
Jp7's Avatar
Jp7
Jp7 is offline
Member
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 3,028
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by Brian
I know exactly what you mean about the pressure drop across the filter, but the fact is that the stock intakes are really well designed and you shouldnt mess with them if your truck is stock. Some cars have a ridiculous amount baffles and restrictions and changing the intake set-up is worth it. In our case, it just is not worth it. yes your engine has to work less to pull in the intake air, but the difference is negligible.
good advice - the ONLY way you will get extra MPG's from an intake is if you are constantly revving the engine so high that the resistance will actually be different, in that case you could save more gas with a lighter foot.
 
  #15  
Old 02-07-2009
rizoss16's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: CT
Posts: 808
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I did the air box mod where you remove the silencer because I thought it would sound cool, but I cannot notice any difference in sound, so should I put it back in? Or does it really matter?
 
  #16  
Old 02-07-2009
chainfire's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Mission B.C.
Posts: 3,126
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by rizoss16
I did the air box mod where you remove the silencer because I thought it would sound cool, but I cannot notice any difference in sound, so should I put it back in? Or does it really matter?
Doesnt matter
 
  #17  
Old 02-08-2009
crawly1025's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Steubenville Ohio
Posts: 1,363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I know my "cold" air intake did nothing but pull in loads of engine heat....especially when I was in traffic. I could monitor the temp with my Scangauge. I put the stock set up back in just to see if there was a difference....huge temp drop. I'm going to stick with the factory air box set up. Bought a Fram Airhog stock replacement washable filter for it, and I'll just go with that.
 
  #18  
Old 02-08-2009
wydopnthrtl's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,496
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Hotter air actually makes for better mileage. However.. the stock tune starts to pull timing at something pretty low like 110F. (I posted a picture on here somewhere showing this) So the open conical filters are best at pure flow. But the tune will pull power because of the underhood heat.

Rich
 
  #19  
Old 02-08-2009
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Haddon Heights, NJ
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jp7
Waste of money on a stock engine with a stock tune. Unless you are doing it so it sounds "cool". Listen if you want, but I tune for a living.
i meant to ask you on my thread...but just thought of it now... Pretty much purchasing an aftermarket intake is just for looks? right?
 
  #20  
Old 02-08-2009
Jp7's Avatar
Jp7
Jp7 is offline
Member
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 3,028
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by ChaosFromAbove
i meant to ask you on my thread...but just thought of it now... Pretty much purchasing an aftermarket intake is just for looks? right?
looks and sound. If you had a modified engine (say ported heads) and a better tune you could score some more torque.
 
  #21  
Old 02-08-2009
Jp7's Avatar
Jp7
Jp7 is offline
Member
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 3,028
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by wydopnthrtl
Hotter air actually makes for better mileage. However.. the stock tune starts to pull timing at something pretty low like 110F. (I posted a picture on here somewhere showing this) So the open conical filters are best at pure flow. But the tune will pull power because of the underhood heat.

Rich
If you say so.
 

Last edited by Jp7; 02-08-2009 at 08:27 PM.
  #22  
Old 02-12-2009
rizoss16's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: CT
Posts: 808
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by wydopnthrtl
Hotter air actually makes for better mileage. However.. the stock tune starts to pull timing at something pretty low like 110F. (I posted a picture on here somewhere showing this) So the open conical filters are best at pure flow. But the tune will pull power because of the underhood heat.

Rich
So if I put on a CAI, the cone filter sucking in the hot air from the engine will actually improve fuel economy? Sacrificing some power for fuel economy is worth it to me.
 
  #23  
Old 02-12-2009
darkstar_420's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: sk
Posts: 621
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
When i put my k&n fipk on i noticed a slight difference in throttle response, and during acceleration i also noticed a differece.
 
  #24  
Old 02-12-2009
Jp7's Avatar
Jp7
Jp7 is offline
Member
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 3,028
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by rizoss16
So if I put on a CAI, the cone filter sucking in the hot air from the engine will actually improve fuel economy? Sacrificing some power for fuel economy is worth it to me.
.

Hot air is less dense. This means there are less air molucules getting into your engine. Your computer uses sensors to try and mix 14.7 parts of air with 1 part of fuel. If you pull in less air you will squirt less fuel. If you have less fuel then you get less power.

best gas mileage tips come from reducing losses..

weight, friction, drag. Every wantabee tuner says "oh my new cold air intake has less friction in the pipes so i'll get better mileage because its easier to suck in air without restricting the engines intake stroke", but in reality there is no restriction on your stock intake system at a whopping cruising 1500-2500 RPM. think about it. If you are cruising for gas mileage then where is your RPM? Low right?

Your engine might actually "feel" less intake resistance when you are on it ***** to the wall at 5,000 rpm with a new intake, but you will get crap mileage at this rpm because your engine is sucking in air so fast - see the logic here?
 
  #25  
Old 02-12-2009
crawly1025's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Steubenville Ohio
Posts: 1,363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^ Agreed and well put JP.

Just as a FYI, the stock intake back on the rig withan AigHog replacement filter pulls much cooler temps. Just in case anyone was interested. This is proven since you can see the Intake Air temp if you have ScanGauge connected.
 


Quick Reply: Cold air intakes!



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:34 PM.