General Ford Ranger Discussion General discussion of the Ford Ranger that does not fit in any other sub-forum.

Gas mileage

Old Dec 19, 2009
  #1  
travidious's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: n.b, tx
Icon6 Gas mileage

I have a 3.0 2wd. and the gas mileage is horrible about 13 to 14 around town, but up to about 18 on the freeway. what would be the first or best thing to do? Ive replaced the fuel filter, the spark plugs, and wires, the air filter. but im thinking the O2 sensors or a cat replacement. Any suggestions?
 
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2009
  #2  
citytricker's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
From: Huntington,WV
alingment and propper tire pressure
 
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2009
  #3  
_97_4X4_'s Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
From: Columbus, GA
You are getting slightly lower than you should... dont expect too much more though...

I agree with making sure you have the correct tire pressure. It really makes a difference!
 
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2009
  #4  
ClemsonRanger03's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 804
Likes: 1
From: Clemson, SC
I too have a 3.0 2wd automatic, and I average about 16 mpg. however I'm pretty sure my speedometer is off some due to tire size I suppose.
 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2009
  #5  
ks ranger's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 273
Likes: 1
From: KS
My 92 on average gets right around 16mpg in town.
 
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2009
  #6  
travidious's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: n.b, tx
will new O2 sensors help? or maybe new Cats?
 
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2009
  #7  
Jacklake2003's Avatar
Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: ATLANTA, Ga
I would bet the O2 sensors are ok if you're not getting a chack engine light. Not sure about the cats. Unless you have super high mileage, I would think it would be OK. I use to have a 3.0 4x4 Ranger, now I have a 4.0 4x4.... The 4.0 gets better mileage than my 3.0 did. Also remember, one of the(if not the biggest) ways to alter mileage is to alter driving.
 
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2009
  #8  
Jp7's Avatar
Jp7
Member
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,028
Likes: 17
From: N/A
My 2004 3.0 gets 21-22mpg combined driving about 2/3rd highway, 1/3rd city. The truck is manual transmission / rear wheel drive and rarely above 3000rpm.
 
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2009
  #9  
Jp7's Avatar
Jp7
Member
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,028
Likes: 17
From: N/A
Originally Posted by travidious
will new O2 sensors help? or maybe new Cats?
If the catalysts are plugged causing excessive backpressure from burning extra fuel than you should correct the condition causing rich conditions before you replace them. Having one or more plugged catalysts will cause poor mileage, overheating and difficulty getting to highway speeds.
 
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2009
  #10  
knightmare1015's Avatar
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 890
Likes: 1
From: unknown
Gas Mileage secrets...

There are several things you can do to help improve MPG's. The first is invest in a tonneau cover. It reduces drag and improves the areodynamics of your truck causing an increase in MPG's. The second is make sure that your tires are properly inflated. The 3rd thing you can do is switch from interstate to highway driving where the speeds are alot slower and your truck is running at lower RPM's. I finally saw the mythbusters episode about the tailgate senario and was amazed. lowering the tailgate doesn't help at all, infact you lose MPG's instead of gaining them. The other thing you can do is upgrade to a high performance air filter and exhaust and alow the engine to breathe better. Also change your oil and airfilter (or clean your air filter, which ever applies) every 3,000 miles. The ultimate secret is weight reduction. If you're running a V6 or an inline 4 cylinder, how much weight is that engine pushing for you to move? think about it for a moment.
 
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2009
  #11  
IronRanger92's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
From: SC
Not much hope with a 3.0. They just require you to put your foot in it to much to get around. Mine did. The new truck has a 4.0, gets around alot better. Smokes my old mans 2.3 5spd truck. lol.
 
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2009
  #12  
knightmare1015's Avatar
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 890
Likes: 1
From: unknown
Originally Posted by IronRanger92
Not much hope with a 3.0. They just require you to put your foot in it to much to get around. Mine did. The new truck has a 4.0, gets around alot better. Smokes my old mans 2.3 5spd truck. lol.
well it also depends on what rear gears you're running too. I have had 3 rangers. the 3.0 isn't too hot yes. The 4.0 OHV stayed in the shop after so many miles. but it had 3.73:1 rear gears and I don't like them after having the 4.10:1 rear gears is alot better with highway driving than interstate. easier on the gas tank and wallet. I figure if you shaved around 1,800 Lbs off the ranger it would probably get nearly double of what it gets now.
 
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2009
  #13  
IronRanger92's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
From: SC
Yea. I had 4.10's with the 3.0. It got around well for a 3.0. This truck has 3.73s and 31's, for now. 4.56's and 33's to come soon
 
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2009
  #14  
knightmare1015's Avatar
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 890
Likes: 1
From: unknown
Originally Posted by IronRanger92
Yea. I had 4.10's with the 3.0. It got around well for a 3.0. This truck has 3.73s and 31's, for now. 4.56's and 33's to come soon
Shame on you. L.O.L. I plan on doing alot to my truck here before alond unless another disaster happens with my money situation.
 
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2009
  #15  
OVERtheEDGE's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,441
Likes: 0
From: locust grove georgia
buy a smart car for gas miliage not a ranger
 
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2009
  #16  
jtfoxman's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 891
Likes: 1
From: The Poconos
My 4.0 gets 15-16 around town and around 19-20 on the highway so I would do what the above posters suggest because there is something that is a little off with your truck.
 
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2009
  #17  
Jp7's Avatar
Jp7
Member
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,028
Likes: 17
From: N/A
Originally Posted by knightmare1015
The other thing you can do is upgrade to a high performance air filter and exhaust and alow the engine to breathe better.
No, and No.
 
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2009
  #18  
Dweano's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
From: Saskatchewan
Originally Posted by knightmare1015
. I finally saw the mythbusters episode about the tailgate senario and was amazed. lowering the tailgate doesn't help at all, infact you lose MPG's instead of gaining them.
In that episode didn't they prove that tonneau covers do nothing? Or is my memory failing me
 
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2009
  #19  
Jp7's Avatar
Jp7
Member
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,028
Likes: 17
From: N/A
Originally Posted by Dweano
In that episode didn't they prove that tonneau covers do nothing? Or is my memory failing me
I think I remember it, and yeah, your basically right.

I have a hard top on one of my rangers and I don't really see any difference in personal data.
 
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2009
  #20  
knightmare1015's Avatar
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 890
Likes: 1
From: unknown
Originally Posted by OVERtheEDGE
buy a smart car for gas miliage not a ranger
I can't even get in one of those so why would I buy it.

Originally Posted by Jp7
No, and No.
Excuse me but I did gain 4 MPG's by doing just that. A direct oem replacement high performance filter was what I was suggesting. Like K&N or AEM.

Originally Posted by Dweano
In that episode didn't they prove that tonneau covers do nothing? Or is my memory failing me
I was talking about LOWERING the tailgate. I mentioned the Toneau cover because everyone that I have seen for sale anywhere claims that it does. Correct me if I'm wrong but don't you have to prove claims like that before you advertise it?
 
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2009
  #21  
korey89's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,672
Likes: 6
From: South, FL
Originally Posted by knightmare1015
I can't even get in one of those so why would I buy it.

Unless youre a lardass thats a lie, Im 6'3" and have plenty of room inside of them
 
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2009
  #22  
StrangerRanger's Avatar
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 756
Likes: 2
From: The 253
You can spend some more dough and get an exhaust system and a K&N intake.

I get 20 in town and 26-27 on the highway in my 2000 3.slow.

02 sensors helped alot for me as well.
 
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2009
  #23  
BlutoBodine's Avatar
Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 543
Likes: 3
From: Tulsa, OK
Cheap tires can hurt mileage also - lost 3mpg on my SVT Contour when I replaced the OEM tires with Kumho. Perhaps it wasn't just because they were cheap, but some research will show what type of tire will help or hurt fuel economy. Something like the Goodyear Max Fuel tire or some of the Michelin tires claim improved fuel economy.
 

Last edited by BlutoBodine; Dec 23, 2009 at 08:17 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2009
  #24  
ChromeYellowRanger01's Avatar
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
From: Branchville, NJ
Our family's second Ranger is a 99 3.0 auto 2wd. It gets 20 around town. She's going on 180K now, bone stock. Ever since I've had the truck she has always got 20mpg.
 
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2009
  #25  
silverstreak4x4's Avatar
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 979
Likes: 2
From: Brighton, Michigan
Originally Posted by knightmare1015
I was talking about LOWERING the tailgate. I mentioned the Toneau cover because everyone that I have seen for sale anywhere claims that it does. Correct me if I'm wrong but don't you have to prove claims like that before you advertise it?
You are not going to see any difference in gas mileage by adding a tonneau cover. I remember Popular Mechanics did a test on this. I will try and find it.
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:24 AM.