General Ford Ranger Discussion General discussion of the Ford Ranger that does not fit in any other sub-forum.

Gasoline !

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 28, 2011
  #1  
bud's Avatar
bud
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
From: georgia
Gasoline !

Do you burn 93 octane gas in your 4.0 engine ? If so do you get better milage an more power on 93 octane & is it worth the xtra money ? Bud
 
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2011
  #2  
woofer700's Avatar
Member
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
From: SD
i believe our engines are designed for 87 octane, anything more is a waste. i get the best MPG on 87 non ethanol.
 
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2011
  #3  
rolsmojave3's Avatar
Level III Supporter
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,852
Likes: 3
From: Wisconsin
Waste unless you have a tune for it, then it's only a mild increase in perf.
 
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2011
  #4  
KLC's Avatar
KLC
RF Veteran
iTrader: (29)
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 13,115
Likes: 5
From: New Mexico
Originally Posted by rolsmojave3
Waste unless you have a tune for it, then it's only a mild increase in perf.
This.
 
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2011
  #5  
Melt's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,392
Likes: 2
From: Denver, CO
i have only put 91 in an 87 octane designed engine once, and that was because i accidently put about 2 gallons of 2 stroke in it
 
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2011
  #6  
yellow_tremor_03's Avatar
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
From: Wichita, KS
I'd have to disagree. I used to travel roughly 100 miles per day in my 3.0. A small-town casey's sold 89 octane gas cheaper than 87. If I ran the 87, I would see about 17 mpg highway. It would bump to mid 18's on the 89. you'd think the highway mpg would be better; but no, hills cut that down a lot due to constanly going in and out of O/D.

Seriously though, how does one get the 22 mpg that these trucks are rated to get?? My next fuel purchase will be pure E-85 since it's 30 cents cheaper atm. I sometimes wish I still had my '02 Focus. 30+ MPG on highway with aftermarket intake, headers, exhaust, and a heavy foot!
 
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2011
  #7  
j99ranger4x4's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,381
Likes: 1
From: Delaware, OH
e85 actually is less economical than regular gasoline.
 
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2011
  #8  
btm757's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,980
Likes: 2
From: Norfolk / Chesapeake, VA
I just wish we had a no ethanol station around here
 
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2011
  #9  
KLC's Avatar
KLC
RF Veteran
iTrader: (29)
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 13,115
Likes: 5
From: New Mexico
Originally Posted by j99ranger4x4
e85 actually is less economical than regular gasoline.
Sure is.
 
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2011
  #10  
KLC's Avatar
KLC
RF Veteran
iTrader: (29)
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 13,115
Likes: 5
From: New Mexico
Originally Posted by yellow_tremor_03
My next fuel purchase will be pure E-85 since it's 30 cents cheaper atm.
If fuel economy is the reasoning you are making the wrong choice. You'll only get worse mileage with oxygenated fuel.
 
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2011
  #11  
yellow_tremor_03's Avatar
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
From: Wichita, KS
I don't get "good" gas mileage period. I used to see 300+ miles driving pure highway. Now I see about half that driving in town. How could it get any worse? If it means paying $40 for a fill-up versus $45 for normal gas, I'll take the savings. Besides, this will be the 1st time I have tried E-85.
 
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2011
  #12  
KLC's Avatar
KLC
RF Veteran
iTrader: (29)
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 13,115
Likes: 5
From: New Mexico
Oxygenated fuels have a reduced energy density, which results in increased fuel consumption. E-85 fuels are only designed for flex fuel vehicles. You are only asking for problems running it in a vehicle that's not designed for it.
 
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2011
  #13  
87xlt's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 876
Likes: 3
From: In my truck!
Eh i have to run 93 in my truck thats only because my engine has a 10.3:1 compression ratio and the ecu is tuned for 93 now :). I pay more but 190Hp and 187Ft pd tq ill pay for that! And still get 35mpg on the hwy :).
 
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2011
  #14  
yellow_tremor_03's Avatar
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
From: Wichita, KS
My truck has a flex-fuel 3.0L. In all honesty, I think the tremor package should have included the 4.0 motor.
 
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2011
  #15  
meistreguy's Avatar
Member
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 486
Likes: 1
From: Killeen, TX
I would burn whatever the manufacturer calls for. It will not hurt the engine to run a slightly higher number and may even give you better mileage but you just have to see if it is economically doable. I hate now that you cannot find pure gasoline anymore without that crappy ethanol in it. That does nothing but help corn farmers and could be detrimental to engines.
 
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2011
  #16  
morris's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 7,841
Likes: 2
From: South Detroit.
Originally Posted by yellow_tremor_03
I don't get "good" gas mileage period. I used to see 300+ miles driving pure highway. Now I see about half that driving in town. How could it get any worse? If it means paying $40 for a fill-up versus $45 for normal gas, I'll take the savings. Besides, this will be the 1st time I have tried E-85.
you might be paying less but you'll be doing it more.
 
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2011
  #17  
Red_Ak_Ranger's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 17,221
Likes: 4
Originally Posted by meistreguy
I would burn whatever the manufacturer calls for. .
No no no, this is stupid. Don't ever do what the manufacturer says. They may say 87 is the best gas for your engine but who are they to know? They're only a multibillion dollar corporation who invest massive amounts in money and you're the smartest corn farmer in Kansas so you know what exactly your engine operates best on.

By the way, 40$ to fill your tank is cute.
 
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2011
  #18  
Y2KTJ's Avatar
Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
From: Okeechobee,FL / Singapore
I ran 93 octane when I didn't have a choice after one of the hurricanes. Truck ran like **** the entire tank... would ping like hell, idle like crap and got no improvement in mpg's ... wast of money...
 
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2011
  #19  
rolsmojave3's Avatar
Level III Supporter
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,852
Likes: 3
From: Wisconsin
Because no one ever buys it, it gets old and water contaminated
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jerry101
General Ford Ranger Discussion
9
May 10, 2012 11:58 AM
RedPowerRanger
4.0L OHV & SOHC V6 Tech
14
Jan 18, 2007 07:30 AM
FX2.3
DOHC - 2.3L Duratec / Mazda L Engines
10
Oct 17, 2006 04:54 PM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:25 PM.