General Ford Ranger Discussion General discussion of the Ford Ranger that does not fit in any other sub-forum.

Help me set up the perfect Ranger

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 5, 2009
  #26  
brianjwilson's Avatar
Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,650
Likes: 2
From: Hillsboro, Oregon
The two OHV 4.0L engines that I had were great.

The ranger had 145k miles, and I beat on that thing pretty hard. Most of it's life was with 33's, truck at max gross. I drove it hard, full throttle everywhere I went, lol.
Always fired right up, ran hard, never leaked/burned a drop of oil. The only thing I "fixed" on the engine was the IAC valve. The OHV has great low end pull. Doesn't rev high but doesn't need to.

The explorer with 120k miles, just EGR valve, IAC valve, and intake gaskets. Also ran good and strong.

When I worked at a Ford dealership I had atleast a few customer with old 4.0L rangers, a number of them over 200k miles and they wouldn't get rid of them, they loved them.
 
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2009
  #27  
silverbullet32's Avatar
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,175
Likes: 0
From: Skagit Valley, Washington
wow sound slike i got a perfect setup. i like my interior more than a 95+ though because the dash is flat to set things on and the center console arm rest is 10x stronger- its connected to something on both sides. i would say get a 89-97 with 4.0 ohv, manual t-case, and SAS if you have enough money and skills
 
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2009
  #28  
99ranger4x4's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 12,198
Likes: 3
From: Austin, TX
I would say 98-00 Body, 4.0 OHV 4x4. If you just want a weekend warrior and dont plan on heavily modifying it i would go with that.. Hell if i get another ranger i'll be getting one like that.

its a hell of a lot easier to swap a CV shaft on the 98+ than it is to swap one on a C CLIP TTB.
 
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2009
  #29  
brianjwilson's Avatar
Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,650
Likes: 2
From: Hillsboro, Oregon
Originally Posted by 99ranger4x4
I would say 98-00 Body, 4.0 OHV 4x4. If you just want a weekend warrior and dont plan on heavily modifying it i would go with that.. Hell if i get another ranger i'll be getting one like that.

its a hell of a lot easier to swap a CV shaft on the 98+ than it is to swap one on a C CLIP TTB.
That is the advantage of a 98+, the front end is really easy to work on. But you don't get much travel from it at all.
 
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2009
  #30  
silverbullet32's Avatar
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,175
Likes: 0
From: Skagit Valley, Washington
and you might need travel for offroading lol
 
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2009
  #31  
silverbullet32's Avatar
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,175
Likes: 0
From: Skagit Valley, Washington
how about getting a pontiac aztec?




you guys remeber the rant about them? LMFAO!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2009
  #32  
99ranger4x4's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 12,198
Likes: 3
From: Austin, TX
Originally Posted by brianjwilson
That is the advantage of a 98+, the front end is really easy to work on. But you don't get much travel from it at all.
TTB doesn't really offer that much travel unless you get into custom **** either.

I can change a 98-00 CV shaft in 15 minutes.. TTB bull **** you gotta pull everything to pull a stupid c-clip.
 
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2009
  #33  
country346's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 459
Likes: 0
From: East , Texas
Originally Posted by 99ranger4x4
I can change a 98-00 CV shaft in 15 minutes...
LOL becuase you had alot of practice
 
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2009
  #34  
country346's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 459
Likes: 0
From: East , Texas
Ohh yeah btw, I would also go with the 97 4.0 Manual. I can't recomend any lifts as I havn;t had any personal experiance with lifts for them. I would run 33's with 4.56's some good tube bumpers with matching sliders and maybee a good winch set up as well.
 
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2009
  #35  
RangerJacoby99's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
From: Thornton,CO
Originally Posted by silverbullet32
how about getting a pontiac aztec?




you guys remeber the rant about them? LMFAO!!!!!!!!!!!!
didnt they have tents in the back of umm haha
 
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2009
  #36  
99ranger4x4's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 12,198
Likes: 3
From: Austin, TX
Still thinkin 98+

you don't really have any increase in wheel travel with TTB over SLA.. I just don't really like the old front ends i guess haha

Originally Posted by country346
LOL becuase you had alot of practice
Yep!!
 
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2009
  #37  
04blackedge's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (13)
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 23,426
Likes: 8
From: Durham, NC
1997 Ford Ranger

1997 ford ranger extended cab4wd
 
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2009
  #38  
brianjwilson's Avatar
Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,650
Likes: 2
From: Hillsboro, Oregon
Originally Posted by country346
LOL becuase you had alot of practice
lol
After you do it once, it is super easy actually. Wheel off, axle nut off (if live axle), brakes rotor and caliper off, ball joint pinch nut out, hammer bottom of control arm, pull CV from wheel knuckle, pry it out from diff.
 
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2009
  #39  
99ranger4x4's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 12,198
Likes: 3
From: Austin, TX
how about..

disconnected upper ball joint, and i THINK i might have disconnected the TRE... caliper, brake line and 35" tire still on, balancing from a hi-lift.

yeaa.. scary. ha
 
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2009
  #40  
brianjwilson's Avatar
Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,650
Likes: 2
From: Hillsboro, Oregon
Tire still on, huh? Nice!
I seem to recall leaving the tie-rod end on and turning to the lock in the direction of the CV joint I was pulling.

Aaaaanyway.
 
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2009
  #41  
99ranger4x4's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 12,198
Likes: 3
From: Austin, TX
yep tire on, trying not to put all the weight on the brake hose.. no jack stands, single halogen, freezing my *** off in the parking lot of my apartment in laramie.

I broke my wheel lock key, had those stupid *** gorilla lugs so every lug was a lock... managed to get one nut off with the broke key socket, then hammered on my 17mm deep 3/8" socket, couldnt get the lug back out (its still in there to this day) and didn't have 2 more 17mms laying around.. as soon as my step dad shipped me a new socket i replaced all the lug nuts with standard OE nuts.


there's also a trick, i think on the driver side you have to put the cv shaft into the axle first, then through the spindle? idk i remember the pass. side bein a ***** when i put it into the axle first and the driver side being a ***** when i put it through the knuckle first.. maybe it was the other way around, but it was being picky.
 
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2009
  #42  
Riceman's Avatar
Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 576
Likes: 0
From: GA
Originally Posted by SniperX103
I think your confused. In 1997 the Ranger 4.0 was OHV, not the SOHC.
The Ranger got the SOHC in 01, but it has been in Explorers since 97. The OHV was standard in 97-00 Expos with the SOHC as an option, and then then SOHC became standard in 01.
 
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2009
  #43  
ranger_1999's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,444
Likes: 0
From: spindale, NC
sealed the deal on my land. So next week when i get back from the beach, or the following week, I hope to have a lvlII i've been eying in TN. Im gonna order the BL, wheels/tires and exhaust have them ready.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jrosenstein
Member Introductions
2
Jan 19, 2014 07:35 AM
95offroadx
Wheels & Tires Semi-Tech
0
Sep 29, 2009 08:00 PM
HAZZARDJOHN
New Ideas
13
Feb 27, 2008 06:52 AM
Cam Condy
Suspension Tech
4
Oct 24, 2006 11:32 PM
Mnemonic
Exterior Semi-Tech
7
Mar 11, 2005 03:22 PM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:53 AM.