new camaro already bagged. GREAT read.
all new camaros look like crap IMO, yet that new engine is really responsive to upgrades. Stock dyno is 370-80ish btw... with cams, intake, exhaust and a good tune it will be at 490ish. Havent seen a properly tuned '10 camaro go down the strip though.
~HJ
Last edited by HAZZARDJOHN; Nov 13, 2009 at 08:36 AM.
I don't know, It was in Texas. I would love to tell you, but I didn't go so I never looked into it and the website is down. I am friends with him on Facebook, I will ask when I get home (can't Facebook at work)
Edit Looking at the pics it looks like "Dallas Raceway"? I know the event was held at Texas motor speedway, but that is not where the Drag racing was. TMS was just for Autocross and the car show. I did hear they were drag racing down Pit road for fun, but As you can tell that is not pit road.
~HJ
Edit Looking at the pics it looks like "Dallas Raceway"? I know the event was held at Texas motor speedway, but that is not where the Drag racing was. TMS was just for Autocross and the car show. I did hear they were drag racing down Pit road for fun, but As you can tell that is not pit road.
~HJ
Last edited by HAZZARDJOHN; Nov 13, 2009 at 09:07 AM.
I've seen people post "projected" Time slips from an 1/8 mile track, but it is silly, cause there are too many Variables. A cars acceleration isn't a smooth curve. I do know if this was "Dallas Raceway" like I think that sign says. It is a 1/4 mile track.
~HJ
I don't know you guys got me doubting myself now, and I know this guy and I know he wouldn't lie or do any thing like that. He wouldn't have cared, hell he didn't even take those pics someone else who was there posted them (he was driving LOL) . Either way it is a fast car, I just wish it wasn't so ugly, I want a LS powered 2 Door vehicle so bad it hurts but they keep putting it in lame looking cars.
~HJ
~HJ
Last edited by HAZZARDJOHN; Nov 13, 2009 at 11:18 AM.

LOL I am 6'3" I have driven many Fourth gen F-bodies, I practically have to lay the seat down into the back seat to get my head in. Plus I think the 98-02 camaro is boring looking and the T/A looks like a batmobile.
I don't know you guys got me doubting myself now, and I know this guy and I know he wouldn't lie or do any thing like that. He wouldn't have cared, hell he didn't even take those pics someone else who was there posted them (he was driving LOL) . Either way it is a fast car, I just wish it wasn't so ugly, I want a LS powered 2 Door vehicle so bad it hurts but they keep putting it in lame looking cars.
~HJ
~HJ
I am more doubting equipment now. Either way though, it is very possible to get an L99 Car in the 12's stock. Which when you figure a few years ago mid 14's were impressive to most people, times are good right now for performance.
~HJ
Not that it matters, but the MPH is not tied to the time, Acceleration rates yada change things. I found a few cars after you first said that, that had a 12.3'ish at 107 ish quarter times.
I am more doubting equipment now. Either way though, it is very possible to get an L99 Car in the 12's stock. Which when you figure a few years ago mid 14's were impressive to most people, times are good right now for performance.
~HJ
I am more doubting equipment now. Either way though, it is very possible to get an L99 Car in the 12's stock. Which when you figure a few years ago mid 14's were impressive to most people, times are good right now for performance.
~HJ
I have seen camaro's in the mid - high 12s. But low 12s is crazy.
I just have a hard time believing its completely factory stock.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Austin1
General Ford Ranger Discussion
6
Jul 21, 2007 01:10 AM





