General Ford Ranger Discussion General discussion of the Ford Ranger that does not fit in any other sub-forum.

Question for the great wrenches on the board

Old Jan 3, 2007
  #1  
Vulcancruiser's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Question for the great wrenches on the board

Was just noticing on Consumer Reports site that the 2002-2003 V6 3.0 had a much higher rate of problem reports than other years....since I own an 02 that I just put a fuel pump on, I can see some possible problems.....but the V6 3.0 has been around for a while.......what changed or what common problems is this engine supposed to be having in your opinion?.......
 
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2007
  #2  
lifted97ranger's Avatar
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1
Likes: 4
From: Charlestown, IN
just like every engine there has been some redesigns throughout the years.....the 4.0 changes a little about every 1-2 years
 
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2007
  #3  
GrafixGuy's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,703
Likes: 2
From: Montgomery, AL
I guess my 3.0 is fine...
 
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2007
  #4  
RazorsEDGE's Avatar
There's no lifeguard in the gene pool
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 7,878
Likes: 5
From: New Mexico
I've never had to take my truck in to be fixed. nearing 45000 miles now......
 
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2007
  #5  
gatorblue92's Avatar
RF Veteran
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,239
Likes: 3
From: Delaware
ive got almost 70k on mine and the only problem i have dealt with was the stupid french slave cyl
 
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2007
  #6  
Big04Ranger's Avatar
Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 756
Likes: 0
From: Avon, IN
you guys better knock on some wood here soon if you have luck like i do
 
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2007
  #7  
Maxboost's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 899
Likes: 0
From: Mechanicsville, Maryland
Originally Posted by lifted97ranger
just like every engine there has been some redesigns throughout the years.....the 4.0 changes a little about every 1-2 years
Yeah that sounds about right they changed the block a bunch of times, to try and make it a quieter, and what not.
 
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2007
  #8  
Rolldogg's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,424
Likes: 5
From: Ottawa, Ontario
Originally Posted by Maxboost
Yeah that sounds about right they changed the block a bunch of times, to try and make it a quieter, and what not.
With the 4.0 seems all the ponies were trying to get out..........not a problem with the 3.0 though......still trying to cram more in.
 
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2007
  #9  
reelfishin's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
From: Right here!
From what I can see the only changes to the 3.0L was in 1991 when they changed the pistons and made a few minor engine block changes and then back in 1998 when they changed the intake and cam to up the power to 155 HP.

I would also make sure that the Consumer Reports article was definitely looking only at the 3.0L Vulcan engine and not the newer Duratec 3.0, which has had some issues.
I have read a few articles over the last few years that didn't seem to realize that these were very different engines and not one in the same. The only 3.0L engine that is used in the Ranger is the Vulcan which is assembled at the Lima Engine plant and has had an excellent durability record.

Such a rating may also be due to simply selling more 3.0L enignes those years.
In 2001 Ford began a huge push to market the Ranger to a younger group of buyers as well, many of those who probably tend to be harder on their trucks than the traditional older buyer. The Ranger Edge was created for this market as well, mostly geared toward 18 to 30 year olds. The 3.0L was the standard engine for the Ranger Edge.
(Not that everyone abuses their truck but there's also probably fewer senior citizens that baja their Rangers than do many 18 to 30 years old owners).

See: http://www.pickuptruck.com/html/2001...nger/edge.html
 
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2007
  #10  
n3elz's Avatar
RF Veteran
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 10,623
Likes: 6
From: Kennett Square, PA
Senior here, lol...

77k on mine and no worries...yet...
 
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2007
  #11  
easy-goin's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 482
Likes: 0
From: Port Richey, FL
Originally Posted by reelfishin
(Not that everyone abuses their truck but there's also probably fewer senior citizens that baja their Rangers than do many 18 to 30 years old owners).
Hey! I resemble that remark! LOL
106K & no real problems!
 
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2007
  #12  
FMD's Avatar
FMD
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,877
Likes: 6
From: Amherst NY
wait, ne3lz has a 3.0 AND a 2wd?! DAMN!
 
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2007
  #13  
CadiLLacPimPin's Avatar
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 239
Likes: 1
From: Charlottesville, VA
wait, ne3lz has a 3.0 AND a 2wd?! DAMN!
Dude, I knew that and i've only been a member here for like 2 months!
Ill be sure to steer clear of the Duratec 3.0 for future Ranger purchases...
 
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2007
  #14  
BigEdge126's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
From: Havertown,PA
102000 not one problem! Most reliable vehicle I ever owned! 2wd 3.0
 
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2007
  #15  
2002ranger's Avatar
Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
From: Fayetteville, Arkansas
had to replace my torque converter but it was my fault..68k miles.
 
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2007
  #16  
rolla_guy72's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,256
Likes: 0
From: Fairbanks, AK
59k or so and just a starter, but that's not related to the engine... nothing else...
 
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2007
  #17  
Vulcancruiser's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Thanks for all the replies......this is a great forum.......I feel a little relieved now, since I really like the size of the truck..........a guy at work has the same identical truck I do, and has 140K on it with no problems.....so there may be hope yet...........
 
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2007
  #18  
greygooseranger's Avatar
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,297
Likes: 1
From: SE Michigan
Thru out the years, they change maybe parts suppliers, and things like that. It could be that the quality of parts supplied to Ford went down and there for added to more problems, I know that quality in the industry (I work in it) these days isn't what it use to be, as with everything else in the world now a days.....
 
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2007
  #19  
jrpro130's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 5,057
Likes: 1
From: Florida
62k here. No problems yet.

I sunk my truck too...


And I have the 4r44e and I just killed that because of water damage. Clutch pack was basically desintigrated...
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EricL
General Ford Ranger Discussion
25
Dec 3, 2010 08:02 AM
deathbypsi
New Ideas
2
Sep 16, 2008 10:44 AM
DownSouthTAS
Ranger-Forums Office
2
Oct 8, 2004 10:55 AM
Diabolic
Ranger-Forums Office
11
Sep 30, 2004 03:34 PM
NHBubba_Revisited
Ranger-Forums Office
9
Jun 3, 2004 03:29 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:30 PM.