Sup RedNecks!
maybe cause there's no room for a panhard?
Watts link > panhard.
The reason they do it is 'cause they run a 4-link rear suspension, and need something tho locate the axle side to side. And a Watts link doesn't move side to side with up and down motion like a panhard bar does, so it just makes more sense with an adjustable suspension.
The reason they do it is 'cause they run a 4-link rear suspension, and need something tho locate the axle side to side. And a Watts link doesn't move side to side with up and down motion like a panhard bar does, so it just makes more sense with an adjustable suspension.
I'll say it:
I don't like it.
I don't mind sport trucks lowered 2" or so, but I don't like bagged trucks at all. Still don't ha.
But that's just my op. I can appreciate all the work it takes to do something like that though, so
And I'm not a redneck either. Rednecks don't drive:
I don't like it.
I don't mind sport trucks lowered 2" or so, but I don't like bagged trucks at all. Still don't ha.

But that's just my op. I can appreciate all the work it takes to do something like that though, so

And I'm not a redneck either. Rednecks don't drive:
Watts link > panhard.
The reason they do it is 'cause they run a 4-link rear suspension, and need something tho locate the axle side to side. And a Watts link doesn't move side to side with up and down motion like a panhard bar does, so it just makes more sense with an adjustable suspension.
The reason they do it is 'cause they run a 4-link rear suspension, and need something tho locate the axle side to side. And a Watts link doesn't move side to side with up and down motion like a panhard bar does, so it just makes more sense with an adjustable suspension.
hahai had no idea why, it was my best guess.

haha
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
phat_95_ranger_xlt
General Ford Ranger Discussion
41
Sep 5, 2008 03:19 PM





