New Ideas Have a new idea for your Ford Ranger? General discussion of new ideas for the Ford Ranger.

Out with Cruise Control IN with autopilot!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 02-11-2007
FMD's Avatar
FMD
FMD is offline
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Amherst NY
Posts: 3,873
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Out with Cruise Control IN with autopilot!

I have been thinking about this for years, and current technology is available to make this work, quite effectively. However, it would require driver knowledge of the systems full range of capabilites, which is why its not ready for mass market, but, TODAY this COULD work.

heres the idea... the car, drives itself... this would only work on the thruway tho, and would only work if your somewhat partially paying attention. heres how I see it as it would work..

not that all this technology exists in other sectors, its just a matter of putting ti all together.

current cruise control works fine, and they already have cars equiped with radar to slow it down if it gets too close to another car... but how do u keep it on the road with out sensors in the road? this is easy..

they already have computers that can recognize color. so u program it to recognize white solid lines on the right hand side, and then for off ramps, u can program it too look for those little which blocks... so that the car doesnt 'get off'.

the other way, is using two lasers mounted on the front of the car, aimed at those inroad reflectors... by taking the speed, and then timing how long to the next reflector, u could 'prime' the system. using this method may be better, or, use it in conjunction with the other method.

as long as ur not napping this system should work pretty well...
 
  #2  
Old 02-11-2007
Sonic_03's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 1,027
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
haha tis genius..sept they've already accomplished this and cars that park themselves! good idea though
 
  #3  
Old 02-11-2007
HarryTasker's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 1,497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is already being worked on by many different institutions.

http://www.darpa.mil/grandchallenge/index.asp
 
  #4  
Old 02-11-2007
IronRanger92's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SC
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
kinda stupid.. i'd rather drive it myself then leave my life in the hands of a machine.. reaction would be the biggest issue
 
  #5  
Old 02-11-2007
Join Date: May 2004
Location: CT
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
It'll will never work. There aren't lines everywhere. Not all lines are the same. Lines come and go. Most roads don't have reflectors. They aren't evenly spaced where they do exist. Nobody is going to implement a system that relies on something unreliable.

The CalTrans has a system used in the rocky mountains for the snow plow trucks. There are magnets embedded down the center of each lane. The truck has sensors underneath it that detect the magnets. There is a monitor in the cab of the truck that looks just like a VOR receiver on an airplane for the driver to look at and keep the truck centered.

Nothing will ever work unless the road has equipment installed on it for that purpose.
 
  #6  
Old 02-11-2007
nbro3232's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Nokomis, FL / Tallahassee
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I saw a thing on tv about how the military has a hummer that can drive itself, recognize signs, all with no person inside. They showed some videos of it driving around in residential neighborhoods.
 
  #7  
Old 02-11-2007
jtslmn720's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Kent State, Kent Ohio
Posts: 7,367
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by FireRanger
It'll will never work.
in our lifetime yes... but eventually it will....

i agree with matt though, itll take soo much money to install all of the units into EVERY road, because you cant just be going down the road, loose a line and expect not to crash.... and what about objects in the road, theyre not going to avoid them as a human would.. theyd just slam on the brakes thinking its a car or something which could injure the occupants...
 
  #8  
Old 02-11-2007
HarryTasker's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 1,497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
unmanned automobiles already exist.

The pentagon has been pushing for it for a while.

http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...ticleId=107529
 
  #9  
Old 02-11-2007
b3kbruiser's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: DFW Area, Tx
Posts: 713
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I think a better way to go about it would be to have a car equipped with precision GPS, to a matter of feet, and you inpute where you want to go, and the car detects where it is, loads a roadmap from a database, and finds the quickest route there, than using sensors that detect cars in front/behind and a camera that recognizes signs, drives itself based on input/output loops (ex: if red, then stop. if green, then go. if green and mass detected entering intersection on collision course, apply full brake.)


How lazy are we? We don't even want to drive anymore... The other day I caught myself in front of the microwave, about to cook a frozen burrito, and the direction said nuke for 2 minutes, then turn over, and I though, gawd damm, now they want me to turn over the burrito? I kind of wanted to shoot myself for being THAT lazy that I can't even turn over the pre-made, frozen, 3 minute to cook burrito.
 
  #10  
Old 02-12-2007
FMD's Avatar
FMD
FMD is offline
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Amherst NY
Posts: 3,873
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts


i was thinking more along the lines of, like the do it urselfer inventer... thats why i said 'driver would need to know the limits of the system'
 
  #11  
Old 02-12-2007
Join Date: May 2004
Location: CT
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
GPS is not accurate enough for that even with a clear view of the sky. Add in the trees, buildings, bridges, overpasses, and weather. You'll be in a ditch before you can say crash.
 
  #12  
Old 02-12-2007
Lignite's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nashua, MT
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
GPS location and 'Auto-steer' is a common feature on tractors and sprayers (agricultural equipment) today, and is guaranteed accurate to within a couple of feet, and is in practice much more accurate, much less than a foot; which is better than most humans are capable of in the same situation. Of course this is slow speed applications (2-20mph); I know I wouldn't trust it in on the freeway even if everybody else had the same stuff. Central computers running our freeways? Inside of 30 years I'll bet.
 
  #13  
Old 02-12-2007
Join Date: May 2004
Location: CT
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
A foot or two makes a big difference on the road. Even if it could be accurate to within a foot most of the time, that is still unacceptable. Because when it happens to have a moment of of +/- 10 feet, you plow into a bridge abutment.
 
  #14  
Old 02-12-2007
TommyC's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 1,012
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Someone actually did this already. The institute/whatever had a car autopilot on the freeway somewhere in california for 100 miles or so (w/ a driver on board of course). This was talked about on the news quite a bit around a year ago.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
2001fordranger
General Technical & Electrical
1
07-29-2009 10:58 PM
sullys_ranger
Interior Semi-Tech
8
02-17-2008 09:25 AM
GVSU Godfather
Audio & Video Tech
23
05-29-2005 06:39 PM
n3elz
Interior Semi-Tech
4
11-21-2004 08:02 PM



Quick Reply: Out with Cruise Control IN with autopilot!



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:44 AM.