Liftting my 03 ranger Fx4
#1
#2
#4
For the 4" superlift, it is required eventually. I only got 4,000 miles out of my stock one. Others can last up to and past 20,000 miles. I always reccommend carrying the tools with you in the glovebox or something to remove the shaft when it does finally go.
The reason for the new shaft is 98+ front driveshafts rear joint gets put in pretty much a bind because of dropping the differential down for the lift kit. The angle is too much for the joint to handle. This overtime will bind and make the truck shake. Or it'll rip a hole in the boot then spew grease everywhere then eventually bind up and shake the truck.
Here's a thread that shows the alternative to spending the $450-550 for the Superlift shaft. Mine ran me $300 and I use all brand new parts...use junkyard parts and it'll be half the Superlift shaft price....about $200.
https://www.ranger-forums.com/forum2...riveshaft.html
The 4" Superlift in my opinion is the best suspension lift available for the 98+ Rangers. Well...now it's the only one that's available. lol. Only downside to the kit are the sway bar end links which are poorly designed. The other kit, RCD, has quite a few downsides...but a couple upsides like coil-overs.
The reason for the new shaft is 98+ front driveshafts rear joint gets put in pretty much a bind because of dropping the differential down for the lift kit. The angle is too much for the joint to handle. This overtime will bind and make the truck shake. Or it'll rip a hole in the boot then spew grease everywhere then eventually bind up and shake the truck.
Here's a thread that shows the alternative to spending the $450-550 for the Superlift shaft. Mine ran me $300 and I use all brand new parts...use junkyard parts and it'll be half the Superlift shaft price....about $200.
https://www.ranger-forums.com/forum2...riveshaft.html
The 4" Superlift in my opinion is the best suspension lift available for the 98+ Rangers. Well...now it's the only one that's available. lol. Only downside to the kit are the sway bar end links which are poorly designed. The other kit, RCD, has quite a few downsides...but a couple upsides like coil-overs.
Last edited by Fx4wannabe01; 12-11-2009 at 08:33 PM.
#7
there's nothing you can do....it's a **** poor design idea anyway IMO as far as maintainence goes as well.
Need something that has a better usable angles, and an adaptor and a normal ujoint or double cardon is simple, cheap, and very reliable.
Does anybody know why ford put these stupid CV joints on their front shafts anyway?
Need something that has a better usable angles, and an adaptor and a normal ujoint or double cardon is simple, cheap, and very reliable.
Does anybody know why ford put these stupid CV joints on their front shafts anyway?
#8
probaby a Mazda thing
I never understood what the problems was until went to take it off and saw how it had been rubbing and seemed to be some what bound yook it off a few days a go and wow how much quiter the cab of my truck washope my new keeps it that way but doult it twin sticks always seem louder
I never understood what the problems was until went to take it off and saw how it had been rubbing and seemed to be some what bound yook it off a few days a go and wow how much quiter the cab of my truck washope my new keeps it that way but doult it twin sticks always seem louder
#10
you could always go with a bodylift instead of the superlift...
you achieve the same results and you dont have to bother with the driveshaft replacement since the suspension angles havent changed...
not to mention its much cheaper.. you can get a BL for $150-200 instead of the $1600 superlift
you achieve the same results and you dont have to bother with the driveshaft replacement since the suspension angles havent changed...
not to mention its much cheaper.. you can get a BL for $150-200 instead of the $1600 superlift
#11
#14
Double cardan joints are also CV's but they can tolerate much larger and variable angles. That's why they were used on the TTB's where the front diff moves with the suspension. Double cardans have to be way more expensive to manufacture than the 98+ CV's.
Money talks, overengineering (for the original application) walks.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
drummerboy13
General Ford Ranger Discussion
6
08-03-2014 08:33 PM
nross
General Ford Ranger Discussion
43
11-13-2009 08:15 AM
Morph
General Ford Ranger Discussion
15
09-01-2005 02:05 PM