2.3L & 2.5L I4 Tech General discussion of 2.3L and 2.5L I4 Ford Ranger engines.

what to expect

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 30, 2007
  #1  
Lone-Ranger's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
From: Tri-Cities
what to expect

Okay i knew this day was on its way. With the rising price of gas and lack of need for a 4x4 i have come to the realization that it is time that i think about trading out my current 2000 XLT 4.0 4x4.

Now I have been taking a hard look at the 1999-2000 2.5l 4-bangers. Now i know that there will be a dramatic difference in all aspects, hopefully milage being one the biggest. So i want to hear it blankly. What am i to expect? What do i need to look for...stayaway from? How about the 2.5 vs the 2.3 of later models? I hate to have to downsize like this but seeing as how i'm really needing to get rid of this gas hog...no matter how in love with it i am....it has to be done.

thanks guys
 
Reply
Old May 1, 2007
  #2  
bwester04's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,641
Likes: 2
From: Round Rock, Tx
i'd personally get the 2.3L DOHC, i've driven them and it's a peppy little motor for a 4banger truck and can get 30+ hwy
 
Reply
Old May 1, 2007
  #3  
SouthernMudSlinger's Avatar
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,724
Likes: 1
From: Demorest,Ga
I got the 2.5, and I can easily get 22mpg with the lead foot I have. I got 26mpg one time driving locally, just taking it really easy. (that wasn't freeway driving). Mines going on 145k miles soon, and I've had it since last september, and havent spent a penny in repairs, and as far as I know, it doesn't use any oil. I'd get a 5spd, more control, and more peppy feeling. It doesn't have a ton of power, but it will do 0-60mph in about 9 seconds.
 
Reply
Old May 1, 2007
  #4  
Lone-Ranger's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
From: Tri-Cities
yeah 5 speed is a def for me. Not only because of the milage advantage but they are more "fun" to drive. So what are your guys' thoughts between the 2.3 and the 2.5? Reliability, power and where it is (higher/lower). I have a prospect that i have my eye on. Here it is what do you guys think? a deal? Ranger
 
Reply
Old May 2, 2007
  #5  
gasman's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh
I also recommend getting a 2.3. The motor is still in production, it has a little more hosepwoer then the 2.5. I get about 24 MPG as an average and that all city, no highway. I could prohibably push 30-33 MPG's on the highway if I don't drive like an idiot. horsepower wise its not bad. its rated at 143 hp, which is only 5 less then the 3.0.
 
Reply
Old May 2, 2007
  #6  
Jester983's Avatar
Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 429
Likes: 0
From: La habra, CA
+1 on the 2.3L DOHC, its got about 20 horses on my 2.5L (119hp).

As you can see in my sig I have a 2.5L engine and extended cab. Seriously its pretty nice. Generally around town i get 17mpg, and on the highway 21-22mpg... Honestly if I were you id look into the newer 2.3L, with today's gas prices going up, that will provide better results and more bang for your buck then the 2.5.

Either way you will definately save money and the engines are built pretty well.

Hope that helps.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SKINSFAN
4.0L OHV & SOHC V6 Tech
19
Feb 8, 2009 08:16 PM
poor_boy_custom
2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech
5
Mar 28, 2008 08:09 PM
vansnxtweek
Suspension Tech
24
Dec 15, 2007 11:46 PM
dangerranger
General Ford Ranger Discussion
11
Aug 18, 2005 10:30 AM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:33 AM.