2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech General discussion of 2.9L and 3.0L V6 Ford Ranger engines.

E-85 in truck with 145k?? good or bad?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 13, 2007
  #1  
marker51691's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: Portage, MI
E-85 in truck with 145k?? good or bad?

Ok, so i have a 1999 flex fuel 3.0 and its got 145000 on the clock. I was wondering if it would hurt the truck at all to run some ethanol in it.
I want to run it for the cheaper gas but i dont want to damage anything either. I heard somewhere that it might knock some build up or something loose due to the higher octane. So basicly my question is will it hurt the truck at all to start running E-85.
 
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2007
  #2  
Red_Ak_Ranger's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 17,221
Likes: 4
nah its good. I'm sure half of all people will say its fine and the other half are "dont ruin a good thing people" who will say you will unleash some hidden problem when you switch.
 
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2007
  #3  
Mike9825's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 489
Likes: 1
From: Willard OH
yep, good to go man! -Mike-
 
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2007
  #4  
Jazz921's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 997
Likes: 0
From: Evansville, IN
I have a 2000 with the same engine with 243K and i use E85 all the time along with regular gas and have had no problems at all so I would think you should be good to use it.
 
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2007
  #5  
Matt3203's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
From: phenix city, alabama
how cheap is E85 compared to gas??
and i never see E85 in alabama or Georgia
 
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2007
  #6  
Hot Wheels's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 211
Likes: 1
From: Maple Plain, MN
Shouldn't hurt it at all. The E85 is a bit more aggresive than gas so it will clean your fuel system out a little. E85 is available everywhere, but it's very prevalent in the midwest, where the corn is. (go figure) I generally get it for about 60 cents less than regular unleaded.
 
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2007
  #7  
masonbass's Avatar
Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
From: cantoment,fl
damn why did i buy a 4.0
 
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2007
  #8  
lifted97ranger's Avatar
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1
Likes: 4
From: Charlestown, IN
but what kind of mpg are you seeing with E85 vs. gas? For that $0.60 a gallon and you aint getting as good of milage...
 
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2007
  #9  
greygooseranger's Avatar
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,297
Likes: 1
From: SE Michigan
^^^??
 
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2007
  #10  
Jazz921's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 997
Likes: 0
From: Evansville, IN
yeah, the mileage is a lot worse so it just about evens out either way you go. E85 may be cleaner but it burns wicked faster!
 
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2007
  #11  
lifted97ranger's Avatar
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1
Likes: 4
From: Charlestown, IN
Originally Posted by greygooseranger
^^^??
see below:

Originally Posted by Jazz921
yeah, the mileage is a lot worse so it just about evens out either way you go. E85 may be cleaner but it burns wicked faster!
 
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2007
  #13  
lifted97ranger's Avatar
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1
Likes: 4
From: Charlestown, IN


I have looked a numerous '04 Explorers and Sport Tracs that had the dual fuel 4.0 in them.....
 
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2007
  #14  
marker51691's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: Portage, MI
I got it for thirty cents cheaper, so we will see how this tank goes and i'll get back to you on how it goes mileage wise.
 
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2007
  #15  
Hot Wheels's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 211
Likes: 1
From: Maple Plain, MN
I only lose about 2mpg's. I keep track all of the time, so I do come out ahead in the long run. I run about 16mpg with gas and 14-14.5 with E85. It also has a higher octane which I like, it feels "spunkier" to me. I'm sure it's just the added numbers on the sticker on the pump but hey, I think it is better.
 
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2007
  #16  
Red_Ak_Ranger's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 17,221
Likes: 4
Originally Posted by Hot Wheels
I only lose about 2mpg's. I keep track all of the time, so I do come out ahead in the long run. I run about 16mpg with gas and 14-14.5 with E85. It also has a higher octane which I like, it feels "spunkier" to me. I'm sure it's just the added numbers on the sticker on the pump but hey, I think it is better.

Yah, corngas has a higher octane BUT a lower BTU.


edit* I really shouldnt use BUT and BTU by each other..just seems weird.
 
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2007
  #17  
zabeard's Avatar
who?
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 10
From: IN
Originally Posted by lifted97ranger


I have looked a numerous '04 Explorers and Sport Tracs that had the dual fuel 4.0 in them.....

where and how much?
 
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2007
  #18  
2003stealthedge's Avatar
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,297
Likes: 0
From: The ILL State
i usually do a mix 50 e85 50 87 octane and usually get the same mpg
 
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2007
  #19  
gatorblue92's Avatar
RF Veteran
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,239
Likes: 3
From: Delaware
does that stuff have similar properties to bio diesel? i have used that a few times in the benz and got a few nasty fuel leaks as a result... i have since switched to the viton fuel lines which are less prone to breakdown from bio
 
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2007
  #20  
zabeard's Avatar
who?
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 10
From: IN
Originally Posted by gatorblue92
does that stuff have similar properties to bio diesel? i have used that a few times in the benz and got a few nasty fuel leaks as a result... i have since switched to the viton fuel lines which are less prone to breakdown from bio

you need a bean burner sticker now. that is why i want a diesel. got to love the bean burners. :)
 
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2007
  #21  
Red_Ak_Ranger's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 17,221
Likes: 4
Originally Posted by gatorblue92
does that stuff have similar properties to bio diesel? i have used that a few times in the benz and got a few nasty fuel leaks as a result... i have since switched to the viton fuel lines which are less prone to breakdown from bio

Nah. E85 To BioDiesel is like...Corn on the Cob to Fries. Sure you can find both at the supermarket, but they're a lot different products.
 
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2007
  #22  
gatorblue92's Avatar
RF Veteran
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,239
Likes: 3
From: Delaware
Originally Posted by zabeard
you need a bean burner sticker now. that is why i want a diesel. got to love the bean burners. :)
i have a sticker that reads "biodiesel no war required" but im not about to put a sticker of any kind on the benz
 
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2007
  #23  
Fredness's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 199
Likes: 1
From: Tejas!
I'd sneak up on it, 25/75 first tank, 50/50 2nd tank, 75/25 3rd tank, then change the filter. Being a full on FFV, I would stay with 75/25 for a while (65% E85) and see how it goes. That will keep everything nice and lubricated and clean things out at the same time.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Matt162b
Member Introductions
8
Jul 7, 2010 07:40 PM
LayingFrame89
Ranger Products, Company, & Member Reviews
34
Dec 1, 2007 06:59 AM
MonsterGuy
General Technical & Electrical
11
Aug 6, 2007 03:29 PM
ranger
General Ford Ranger Discussion
32
Jul 31, 2007 11:50 AM
FMD
General Ford Ranger Discussion
13
Apr 25, 2006 07:21 AM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:02 PM.