Suspension Tech General discussion of suspension for the Ford Ranger.

ranger front end lower then rear?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 30, 2007
  #1  
cloudranger's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
From: International falls, MN
ranger front end lower then rear?

Does anyone know if the ranger is lower in the front end, compared to the rear? My 2001 XLT (stock) seems to look that way, is that normal? I understand that there is a difference in the space between the tire and the body in the front compared to rear, but it does look like it flows downward towards the front. Normal?

Thanks
 
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2007
  #2  
Red_Ak_Ranger's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 17,221
Likes: 4
you mean like...say, because maybe putting 500+ pounds of stuff in your bed of the truck would make it sit lower? And Ford decided a work truck looks better with the back riding high than the front riding high?

Ford Ranger isn't much of a heavy lifting work truck, but none the less, it still counts.
 
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2007
  #3  
cloudranger's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
From: International falls, MN
I just want to know if the rear is suppose to look higher, 500 pounds or not
 
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2007
  #4  
JoshK's Avatar
Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,832
Likes: 0
From: CC, Indiana
yes the front end does sit lower
 
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2007
  #5  
cloudranger's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
From: International falls, MN
ok so my truck is suppose to flow downward towards the front, how do i even that out
 
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2007
  #6  
Mr. Special's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,411
Likes: 1
From: Irvine, CA
Crank your torsion bars (t-bars)

do a search and you'll find 100+ threads on how to do said task
 
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2007
  #7  
99ranger4x4's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 12,198
Likes: 3
From: Austin, TX
just for future reference, Raked is what its called when the front is lower
 
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2007
  #8  
Sonic04Edge's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 5,718
Likes: 1
From: Madison. AL
Originally Posted by Mr. Special
Crank your torsion bars (t-bars)

do a search and you'll find 100+ threads on how to do said task
Read my friend, read. He has an xlt lol. Either you will need to lower the rear or get the coil spacer for the front. Just depends on which way you want to go.
 
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2007
  #9  
RazorsEDGE's Avatar
There's no lifeguard in the gene pool
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 7,878
Likes: 5
From: New Mexico
He does state its an XLT, but he doesn't mention if its 4wd or not. If it is then he will still have torsion bars and if its 2wd then he'll have to find another solution.
 
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2007
  #10  
BRENSRANGER's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,308
Likes: 1
From: Minnesota
mine was 2 inches lower,in front than the rear!
 
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2007
  #11  
4x404Edge's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
From: Orchard Park, NY
I cranked my front end up an inch with the torsion bars and the front still sits an inch and a half lower!
 
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2007
  #12  
Mr. Special's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,411
Likes: 1
From: Irvine, CA
Originally Posted by Sonic04Edge
Read my friend, read. He has an xlt lol. Either you will need to lower the rear or get the coil spacer for the front. Just depends on which way you want to go.
hah oops... yeah scratch that then. With a 1995 XLT (from profile)
 
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2007
  #13  
RazorsEDGE's Avatar
There's no lifeguard in the gene pool
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 7,878
Likes: 5
From: New Mexico
Read his original post its a 2001 XLT and he doesn't state 2wd or 4wd. Might have torsion bars.....might not.
 
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2007
  #14  
Blackhawk's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 586
Likes: 1
From: WI
my stock 01 XLT sat 3" lower in the front. T-bars fixed that until the rear went up.
 
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2007
  #15  
malydeen's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 632
Likes: 4
From: Minneapolis, MN
On mine if you make a line that connects the top of both wheel wells it looks to be raked. But if you fallow the indented line on the body its pretty level. But if you go under the truck the front end seems lower then the rear end.

Its weird, and i dont really want to spend the time to straighten one thing to hve something else look weird.
 
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2007
  #16  
Ranger_Guy15's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,827
Likes: 3
From: MN
I have a quick question about torsion bars. If I crank the bars lets say 4 times, and the tires are out of alignment, and I crank the bars back down, will the tires go back in alignment.
 
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2024
  #17  
Bigredox's Avatar
Member
Joined: Aug 2024
Posts: 52
Likes: 3
From: Springfield mo
Yes, your ranger might be 2" lower in front, stock.

Originally Posted by BRENSRANGER
mine was 2 inches lower,in front than the rear!
My 1996 2WD XLT standard cab standard bed is 2" lower in front. The OEM rear springs aren't very robust, so even a few hundred pounds lowers the back end. It might handle a little better with the CG being lower in front. Plus lower wind resistance maybe for better mileage? Since I rarely carry any weight in the back I've left the ride height alone. I have the bed off of it now for some maintenance. Without the weight of the bed the back end hops all over the place.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
stephen.g.fiddes
Drivetrain Tech
3
Apr 8, 2024 06:13 AM
stephen.g.fiddes
Drivetrain Tech
30
May 2, 2010 06:57 PM
psvines
General Technical & Electrical
1
Jan 1, 2010 06:15 PM
quicksilver2001
Drivetrain Tech
2
Mar 14, 2008 05:51 PM
RangeronDubs
Suspension Tech
14
Mar 10, 2005 08:42 AM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:53 PM.