ranger front end lower then rear?
ranger front end lower then rear?
Does anyone know if the ranger is lower in the front end, compared to the rear? My 2001 XLT (stock) seems to look that way, is that normal? I understand that there is a difference in the space between the tire and the body in the front compared to rear, but it does look like it flows downward towards the front. Normal?
Thanks
Thanks
you mean like...say, because maybe putting 500+ pounds of stuff in your bed of the truck would make it sit lower? And Ford decided a work truck looks better with the back riding high than the front riding high?
Ford Ranger isn't much of a heavy lifting work truck, but none the less, it still counts.
Ford Ranger isn't much of a heavy lifting work truck, but none the less, it still counts.
Originally Posted by Mr. Special
Crank your torsion bars (t-bars)
do a search and you'll find 100+ threads on how to do said task
do a search and you'll find 100+ threads on how to do said task
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 7,878
Likes: 5
From: New Mexico
He does state its an XLT, but he doesn't mention if its 4wd or not. If it is then he will still have torsion bars and if its 2wd then he'll have to find another solution.
Originally Posted by Sonic04Edge
Read my friend, read. He has an xlt lol. Either you will need to lower the rear or get the coil spacer for the front. Just depends on which way you want to go.
On mine if you make a line that connects the top of both wheel wells it looks to be raked. But if you fallow the indented line on the body its pretty level. But if you go under the truck the front end seems lower then the rear end.
Its weird, and i dont really want to spend the time to straighten one thing to hve something else look weird.
Its weird, and i dont really want to spend the time to straighten one thing to hve something else look weird.
Yes, your ranger might be 2" lower in front, stock.
My 1996 2WD XLT standard cab standard bed is 2" lower in front. The OEM rear springs aren't very robust, so even a few hundred pounds lowers the back end. It might handle a little better with the CG being lower in front. Plus lower wind resistance maybe for better mileage? Since I rarely carry any weight in the back I've left the ride height alone. I have the bed off of it now for some maintenance. Without the weight of the bed the back end hops all over the place.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
stephen.g.fiddes
Drivetrain Tech
3
Apr 8, 2024 06:13 AM
stephen.g.fiddes
Drivetrain Tech
30
May 2, 2010 06:57 PM
psvines
General Technical & Electrical
1
Jan 1, 2010 06:15 PM







