SAS Suspension Question - Ranger-Forums - The Ultimate Ford Ranger Resource


Suspension Tech General discussion of suspension for the Ford Ranger.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 08-28-2007
Rooks's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 1,867
SAS Suspension Question

Ok. So I'm starting to really plan out how I want to attack my suspension in the front. I was thinking 3-link like redranger4.0, but with my cast wedges on my '79 D44 I think I'm just going to stick with the radius arms I got with the 44 and then put a panhard bar on. I'm still debating if I want to try coilovers or go with springs and coils seperate. Will that be an acceptable suspension? Or am I missing some components?

My real question is looking at Zabeard's suspension, I'm curious as to what the benefits of using upper and lower control arms vs. using just radius arms?

Also is a trac bar pretty much the same as a panhard bar? Once again Zabeards truck seems to use it in the same way as far as I can tell (can you see who I'm using as a template ).

Appreciate any help.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-29-2007
icb12's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: there
Posts: 175
panhard and trac bar are same thing.
depends one what you are planning to do with your truck. Do you need coilovers?? regular coils would be cheaper for sure.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-29-2007
zabeard's Avatar
who?
iTrader: (8)
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: IN
Posts: 26,045
imo run coils.

panhard is a term used more in racing, like cars and dirt track racing. track bar seems to be a jeep term or offroaders term. but they are both the same thing.

are you running full width? with cast on wedges it would be really hard to run my setup. idk if it is even possible.

Radius arm would be fine run those Cage arms like Scott Did.

only thing i dont like about running radius arms is they hang low, just like torsion bars...

my lower control arms go right up to the bottom of the frame.

idk i like my setup, if i was going to do anything else i would attempt a 4 link or a triangulated 4 link so no track bar is needed.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-29-2007
Rooks's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 1,867
Yep. I'm leaving them full width. I'll look into those Cage arms, but I'm trying to keep this as low budget as possible (I know... SAS and low budget don't really go together, so who knows).

I'm not really saying I'd want to run your setup I'm just wondering what your setup would give you versus radius arms. I'm thinking, it's just another point of articulation, but as the upper arm is actually attached to the lower arm, it can't be much more. I don't know. I guess I just don't understand suspension that well.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Want to Trade: 3" Suspension Lift for Stock Suspension - CA safaripacific Suspension, Tires, & Wheels 17 09-10-2012 08:08 PM
Best On/Off road rear suspension lift help SAS blue_oval Suspension Tech 16 06-15-2011 07:05 PM
Steering upgrade for SAS'd suspension 2002FX4 Suspension Tech 8 10-16-2009 07:03 AM
Checking Interest SAS suspension HighRollerII Suspension, Tires, & Wheels 14 05-19-2009 08:47 PM
lifted heights, SAS, suspension and more badboyzkustumz General Ford Ranger Discussion 13 04-03-2008 02:41 PM


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:15 AM.


We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.