31's vs. 32's
#1
31's vs. 32's
Hey guys ive got a 05 ranger level II w/ the original 31x10.50 bfg at's. the tread is getting low so i will need to buy a new set of tires soon, i am thinking on 32x11.50 bfg mt's. i was wondering about fit and performance (power, milage) the last thing i want to do though is lower my gas milage. i thought since it has 4.10 gears it might make it better by lowering my rpms at cruising speed. but i guess it would have opposite affect at start off... let me know, thanks
#5
#6
#7
#8
X2 on looking Soo much Better........
But..
31 At are fine as well.
so idono when i swapped my tires from a 255/16 michelin crap over to the 265/75/16 (32'')bfg mud's it was sorta night and day, the bfg Handel better, ride smother sound cooler And hands down look so much better but the truck did get slower and loose mileage every where...
But..
31 At are fine as well.
so idono when i swapped my tires from a 255/16 michelin crap over to the 265/75/16 (32'')bfg mud's it was sorta night and day, the bfg Handel better, ride smother sound cooler And hands down look so much better but the truck did get slower and loose mileage every where...
#9
#10
yeah, you have a 4.0L SOHC engine, you shouldn't really notice the tire size to much and you'll probably lose 1mpg (maybe) in city but cruising on the highway you'll get better as it lowers the RPMS just a bit, you have enough power to move the tires around. I have 4.10's and a 3.0L and I'm thinking about jumping up to 33's lol.