Wheels & Tires Semi-Tech General discussion of wheels and tires for the Ford Ranger.

PIC/INFO request! 285/75 r16, 265/75 r16

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 10, 2014
  #1  
livetoride21's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: montreal, quebec
PIC/INFO request! 285/75 r16, 265/75 r16

Hey guys, I'm thinking about putting 285/75 r16s or if those don't work out then 265/75 r16s on my 2002 ranger regular cab 4x4.
looking to see some pics and hear your experience on both. Plans are for a 1 to 1.5" torsion twist, and 1" body lift. Will the 285s rub with 8" rims and 4-4.5" BS ?
Please, if you have pics of either with a stock truck or minor mods, post and tell me about your experience.

Thanks!
 
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2014
  #2  
bravetitan24's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,139
Likes: 3
From: Haughton, LA
Check the albums on my profile. 3" body lift, 285/75-16 on 16x8 wheels.
 
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2014
  #3  
mikerider's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,518
Likes: 11
From: Renton WA
Sam look at my build thread "project search and rescue truck" I ran 285/75r16a on 16x8 for several years with no lift. Great set up!
 
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2014
  #4  
livetoride21's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: montreal, quebec
did the 285s rub at all at stock ride height mikerider?
 
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2014
  #5  
morris's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 7,841
Likes: 2
From: South Detroit.
Search for my name as well. You will find a couple threads with what your looking for.
 
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2014
  #6  
mikerider's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,518
Likes: 11
From: Renton WA
Originally Posted by livetoride21
did the 285s rub at all at stock ride height mikerider?
Just the sway bar at full lock but no issues other then that.

edit heres some pictures

Name:  P1050643.jpg
Views: 14976
Size:  215.4 KB

Name:  P1050634.jpg
Views: 10571
Size:  153.1 KB

Name:  P1050635.jpg
Views: 10346
Size:  108.7 KB



still plenty of room to move the suspension around

Name:  P1070798.jpg
Views: 11062
Size:  204.2 KB
 

Last edited by mikerider; Dec 11, 2014 at 09:43 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2014
  #7  
livetoride21's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: montreal, quebec
Originally Posted by mikerider
Just the sway bar at full lock but no issues other then that.

edit heres some pictures

still plenty of room to move the suspension around
What width rims were you running and with what backspacing?? I'm thinking of getting 16x8 with 4" or 4.25" backspacing.
 
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2014
  #8  
mikerider's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,518
Likes: 11
From: Renton WA
Originally Posted by livetoride21
What width rims were you running and with what backspacing?? I'm thinking of getting 16x8 with 4" or 4.25" backspacing.
those were 16x8 with 4.65 BS Eagle alloys
 
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2014
  #9  
livetoride21's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: montreal, quebec
wow You're running more backspacing than stock?? it doesn't look like your stance is that narrow.
 
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2014
  #10  
mikerider's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,518
Likes: 11
From: Renton WA
Originally Posted by livetoride21
wow You're running more backspacing than stock?? it doesn't look like your stance is that narrow.
8" wheel vs 7 in wheel.... 4in bs on a 7in wheel would be 5 in on an 8. Thus less back spacing then stock.
 
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2014
  #11  
livetoride21's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: montreal, quebec
Originally Posted by mikerider
8" wheel vs 7 in wheel.... 4in bs on a 7in wheel would be 5 in on an 8. Thus less back spacing then stock.
Actually that's not correct. Backspacing is relative to the mating surface of the hub flange, and the back flange of the wheel. What changes when you have say 4.5" backspacing on a 7" wheel vs an 8" wheel is the offset. your center line of the rim relative to the hub flange will be farther out, but the backspacing remains the same. Name:  backspace_offset.jpg
Views: 10255
Size:  23.7 KB

But good to know a 4.65 backspacing works well with that size tire!
 
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2014
  #12  
mikerider's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,518
Likes: 11
From: Renton WA
Originally Posted by livetoride21
Actually that's not correct. Backspacing is relative to the mating surface of the hub flange, and the back flange of the wheel. What changes when you have say 4.5" backspacing on a 7" wheel vs an 8" wheel is the offset. your center line of the rim relative to the hub flange will be farther out, but the backspacing remains the same.

But good to know a 4.65 backspacing works well with that size tire!
you are correct I was thinking in terms of offset,

Name:  wheels_zps1e793751.jpg
Views: 10424
Size:  14.9 KB
 
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2014
  #13  
livetoride21's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: montreal, quebec
Now I'm seriously thinking of a 32x11.5 r15, after looking around some more at pictures and pricing. (buying new rims anyways)
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RangerSkippyRoo
Wheels & Tires Semi-Tech
27
Jul 3, 2024 04:57 AM
immortal_vision
Wheels & Tires Semi-Tech
12
Dec 6, 2009 02:04 PM
davidaters
Snapshots
24
Nov 26, 2009 01:11 PM
davidaters
Wheels & Tires Semi-Tech
4
Nov 26, 2008 07:37 AM
malydeen
Wheels & Tires Semi-Tech
15
Mar 20, 2008 08:27 PM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:00 PM.