overall, which is more reliable
#26
Originally Posted by 3LiterBeater
I don't need to look anything up on line, I'm educated enough on this subject to know whats not factual. Every bearing in the torque convert operates one simple task... They spin. I don't need a master mechanico to tell me that, maybe you do... I think this guy wanted factual information, statistics, or proof NOT someones opinion because thats what they have in their truck and it lasted 100,000 miles... This isn't a black and white discussion. Its preference. The only thing we could really, honestly provide him with is if he wants to drive lazy, get an auto. If he wants to tow, he should probably get an auto if the loads heavy. If he wants to put big whp #s down, he should get a stick. If he wants to lay down times at the track, he should get a stick. I think his question is too broad to be answered, but I don't think anyone should post all this stuff and back it up so willingly as factual evidence when its still just their opinion/preference...
Chill out.
#27
Originally Posted by rngprerunner
The same friend also just had his Auto (dd) rebuilt and it cost 1100, but it also has 125,000 on it...
Like I said, the actual reliability of these things is so dependant on how they are used that I really don't think you can say one is grossly more reliable in the long run.. However I do maintain, that if you have problems w/ an auto, it's going to cost you more. So in the long run I still believe that your average manual trans is going to be cheaper to maintain than your average auto.. given much the same use (abuse).
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post