overall, which is more reliable - Page 2 - Ranger-Forums - The Ultimate Ford Ranger Resource
Ford Ranger Forum - Forums for Ford Ranger enthusiast!

Go Back   Ranger-Forums - The Ultimate Ford Ranger Resource Arrow Ranger-Forums Technical Forum Arrow Drivetrain Tech

Drivetrain Tech General discussion of drivetrain for the Ford Ranger.

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-04-2005
Swoop1156's Avatar
I am: Adamitch H
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Hanover, Maryland
Vehicle: 2010 Raptor /2004 Mach1
Posts: 1,965
Total Props: 0
Originally Posted by 3LiterBeater
I don't need to look anything up on line, I'm educated enough on this subject to know whats not factual. Every bearing in the torque convert operates one simple task... They spin. I don't need a master mechanico to tell me that, maybe you do... I think this guy wanted factual information, statistics, or proof NOT someones opinion because thats what they have in their truck and it lasted 100,000 miles... This isn't a black and white discussion. Its preference. The only thing we could really, honestly provide him with is if he wants to drive lazy, get an auto. If he wants to tow, he should probably get an auto if the loads heavy. If he wants to put big whp #s down, he should get a stick. If he wants to lay down times at the track, he should get a stick. I think his question is too broad to be answered, but I don't think anyone should post all this stuff and back it up so willingly as factual evidence when its still just their opinion/preference...
You don't need to look it up, maybe he does. I don't care if you know what every bearing does in the TC, I could give a crap less. Ooh, you are so smart, Mr. Napeolian! Kudo's. It was merely an example that you took literal. Whatever. We all know, for the most part of you are even the LEAST bit educated about automotive-related subjects, that automatic transmissions provide better towing capabilities, and that manuals do not. Sure, you can tow with a stick -- but not as well, or as easy, or without causing more wear and tear for the same operation.

Chill out.

2010 SVT Raptor, Tuxedo Black -- 6.2 V8
2004 Mustang Mach1, Torch Red -- 4.6 4v V8 -- 5-speed -- way too many mods
Reply With Quote
+ 0 -
Old 08-04-2005
I am: Bubba Somebody
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Somewhere, XYZ
Vehicle: 2003 Ford Ranger FX4 LII
Posts: 4,351
Total Props: 1
Originally Posted by rngprerunner
The same friend also just had his Auto (dd) rebuilt and it cost 1100, but it also has 125,000 on it...
Just like some people can get a clutch done for less than $400.. or get more than 125k out of a clutch to begin w/!

Like I said, the actual reliability of these things is so dependant on how they are used that I really don't think you can say one is grossly more reliable in the long run.. However I do maintain, that if you have problems w/ an auto, it's going to cost you more. So in the long run I still believe that your average manual trans is going to be cheaper to maintain than your average auto.. given much the same use (abuse).

2003 Ford Ranger FX4 Level II - Silver - Stick - fuelly

2009 VW Jetta SportWagon SEL - Grey - Stick - fuelly
2001 Suzuki Bandit 1200 - Red

Mildly Obsessed With Photography
Reply With Quote
+ 0 -

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ok lots of pics of the overall current look.... Jwad00 Snapshots 16 10-09-2009 08:03 PM
WTB/WTT: Reliable Vehicle (NY) Rangerplus Miscellaneous Items 4 03-07-2009 09:51 PM
Reliable On and Off Road Suspension powerranger1988 Suspension Tech 5 02-20-2008 09:34 PM
Looking to buy an 03. How reliable is the M5OD Ray H Drivetrain Tech 4 08-26-2007 05:21 AM

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:21 AM.