General Ford Ranger Discussion General discussion of the Ford Ranger that does not fit in any other sub-forum.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: DashLynx

19.5 MPG's 12" total lift?!?!?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 11-24-2007
Oh5Edge's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Pensacola, FL
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
19.5 MPG's 12" total lift?!?!?

On my way back from Tuscaloosa last weekend I filled up in Prattville. I had about 250lbs of luggage (I carried the other car's luggage and a cooler) in the bed with the AC on windows up moving at about 85-90 mph. I made it back to Pensacola with 1/4 tank left over and drove around town to finish that off before I filled up again. With my tires calibrated in to the equation

(33/28) X miles on tripometer = actual miles driven
Actual miles driven/gallons of gas needed to "fill up" = actual MPG's

So all you guys that are sceptical about 33's with 4.10's and 3.0 here you go. It's possible to hit the 20 mpg avereage for a tank. That's 19.5 mpg's 3/4 fast highway (I kept my foot out of the gas on hills though) and 1/4 city. Just figured I'd share the news.
 
  #2  
Old 11-24-2007
nicholoff's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: LANSING, MI
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
**** i just got home from ohio and only got like 17mpg with the check engine light on. but that is sweet you got that mileage.
 
  #3  
Old 11-24-2007
Trigger01's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 18,788
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
That's not to shabby.
 
  #4  
Old 11-24-2007
RanJerEDGE's Avatar
Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Austin/Houston, Tx
Posts: 689
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hmm, i have 34s, 4.10s and a 3.0, and get 15.5 if im lucky on all highway. on my last trip from austin to houston i got 15.3 with no a/c and staying under 80. and it wouldnt change the numbers too much, but stock the tire size is 29.
 
  #5  
Old 11-24-2007
mroctober16's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Oh5Edge
(33/28) X miles on tripometer = actual miles driven
i think you may have gotten better mpg than you thought, cuz your math is wrong i think. you need to times your miles driven by the difference in the circumfrence of the tires, not just the height to find the actual miles driven.
 
  #6  
Old 11-24-2007
HighRollerII's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 10,073
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
lucky! hah
 
  #7  
Old 11-24-2007
EdGe_wannabe's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Richmond Hill, Georgia
Posts: 4,306
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yea, I thought I got 15, guess not. Thanks Evan for ruining that for me.

Brenton
 
  #8  
Old 11-24-2007
RanJerEDGE's Avatar
Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Austin/Houston, Tx
Posts: 689
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mroctober16
i think you may have gotten better mpg than you thought, cuz your math is wrong i think. you need to times your miles driven by the difference in the circumfrence of the tires, not just the height to find the actual miles driven.
the pi would cancel out, so this is correct.
 
  #9  
Old 11-24-2007
HighRollerII's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 10,073
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by EdGe_wannabe
Yea, I thought I got 15, guess not. Thanks Evan for ruining that for me.

Brenton

anytime buddy!
 
  #10  
Old 11-24-2007
5speedin2.3's Avatar
Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Livonia, Mi
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thats about what my dad (04EDGE) gets in his 4x4 3.0 with 33's and 4.10's.

last time we went upnorth he got 21.5mpg i think, maybe a little more.
 
  #11  
Old 11-24-2007
cowboy63645's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Fredericktown, Missouri
Posts: 813
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thats great!!!! I switched out my 265/75's for some 235/75's with 4.10's and a 3.0 I havet figured it up yet lol
 
  #12  
Old 11-24-2007
Machine090767's Avatar
RF Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 6,410
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the thing is, it's a 3.0.. i guarantee you this, if it were a 4.0, you would've gotten waaay less mileage than 19.5.
 
  #13  
Old 11-24-2007
vindex1963's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: phoenix AZ
Posts: 3,040
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by edgeaholic (tm)
the thing is, it's a 3.0.. i guarantee you this, if it were a 4.0, you would've gotten waaay less mileage than 19.5.
You see the 3.0 getting very decent gas mileage numbers over the 4.0 but it's still claimed the 3.0 and the 4.0 get the same. Mine varies little from 23 mpg but I have 3:73 and a 5 speed stick with 31"s where it looks like most 4.0s are autos so maybe that's the difference.
 
  #14  
Old 11-24-2007
rolla_guy72's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Fairbanks, AK
Posts: 3,256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I hate you and your beautiful truck that gets great gas mileage... haha...
 
  #15  
Old 11-24-2007
ranger_banger's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: cedar falls, iowa
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
runnin all stock except intake, i get like 23 hwy with a 4.0 OHV.





the bad news. i get about 8-10mpg city...
 
  #16  
Old 11-25-2007
Ace's Avatar
Ace
Ace is offline
Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Central, Illinois
Posts: 3,450
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
on the way home from the meet in St. Louis i found a semi going 75 i drafted behind that the entire time lol got 22mpg going 75 the whole way
 
  #17  
Old 11-25-2007
Sonic04Edge's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Madison. AL
Posts: 5,718
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I got 23.5 hwy going up to TN on I-65 going 85-90 with the a/c on full blast going up and down hills most the time. I have 3.0 auto with 30.5in tires. I'm running a programmer thought which helps.
 
  #18  
Old 11-25-2007
4LO 4.0's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Grovetown, Ga
Posts: 650
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wow, the 3.0 gets way better milage than the 4.0. Mines an auto, 3.73 gears, and 32's gets about 15 in the city and gets worse on the hwy.
 
  #19  
Old 11-25-2007
Oh5Edge's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Pensacola, FL
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Sonic04Edge
I got 23.5 hwy going up to TN on I-65 going 85-90 with the a/c on full blast going up and down hills most the time. I have 3.0 auto with 30.5in tires. I'm running a programmer thought which helps.
That's what I did. I took 65 to 82 to get to T-town. I'm sure I would have got better mileage if 82 wasn't so bad on hills. I think a tuner might be in my near future in June after I get my roller-rockers, coil pack and wires so I'll be anxeious to see what kind of mileage I get after that.

Channing, you need to drop it like it's hawt! You'd get better mileage after that too. I got 21 around town when I was lowered. I still got my shorter U-bolts if you want them.
 
  #20  
Old 11-25-2007
Sonic04Edge's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Madison. AL
Posts: 5,718
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Oh5Edge
That's what I did. I took 65 to 82 to get to T-town. I'm sure I would have got better mileage if 82 wasn't so bad on hills. I think a tuner might be in my near future in June after I get my roller-rockers, coil pack and wires so I'll be anxeious to see what kind of mileage I get after that.

Channing, you need to drop it like it's hawt! You'd get better mileage after that too. I got 21 around town when I was lowered. I still got my shorter U-bolts if you want them.
I just have a generic tune with my superchips programmer. I'm going to be looking into buying another tuner sometime soon from Doug. I've heard upwards to 27mpg hwy on a 3.0 with his tune.
 
  #21  
Old 11-25-2007
ranger024x4's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: nova
Posts: 5,061
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 4LO 4.0
Wow, the 3.0 gets way better milage than the 4.0. Mines an auto, 3.73 gears, and 32's gets about 15 in the city and gets worse on the hwy.
strange. I get around 15-16 city (with 275/70's) and 20-21 highway with 4.10s and auto
 
  #22  
Old 11-25-2007
99ranger4x4's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 12,198
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
i get 10 city

i hate all of yall
i cant wait for 37-38s and 5.13s heh, gallons per mile anyone?
 
  #23  
Old 11-26-2007
4LO 4.0's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Grovetown, Ga
Posts: 650
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by offroad_ranger
strange. I get around 15-16 city (with 275/70's) and 20-21 highway with 4.10s and auto
I think the visor and rollin 85 on the hwy doesn't help.
 
  #24  
Old 11-26-2007
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: DFW
Posts: 1,447
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by edgeaholic (tm)
the thing is, it's a 3.0.. i guarantee you this, if it were a 4.0, you would've gotten waaay less mileage than 19.5.
Find my post in the 4.0 forum with my spread sheet detailing my gas mileage!
 
  #25  
Old 11-26-2007
BRENSRANGER's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,308
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
you guys suck..lol i get 11
 


Quick Reply: 19.5 MPG's 12" total lift?!?!?



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:48 PM.