General Ford Ranger Discussion General discussion of the Ford Ranger that does not fit in any other sub-forum.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: DashLynx

Improvements in reliability/durability since 2001?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 01-07-2011
TheBob's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: 16823
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Improvements in reliability/durability since 2001?

Thinking about upgrading the stuck soon, my 2001 just turned 130,000. Obvious downsides to the 2001 were the timing chain rattle, small front breaks, and front suspension joints.

Since not a ton has changed since the model year I own, I'm mainly just looking at mileage instead of model year. I'm open to auto or standard transmission, however I need (or just want) the 4.0 and 4x4.

Has the clutch problem (slave cylinders going bad, if I recall correctly) been solved? If so, what year? How about the timing chain and front suspension?

Any other mechanical improvements of note I should be looking for?
 
  #2  
Old 01-07-2011
djfllmn's Avatar
Ford parts guy
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 6,013
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes on 30 Posts
well the timing chain problem was supposedly fixed in 03...the rattle is hit and miss to begin with
 
  #3  
Old 01-07-2011
fitsector's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Gto, MX
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don´t know if this is the same in US models, mine is the Latin America Version, but since 2008 the rear shock absorbers was moved from inside of the frame to the outside, just like the current F-150. This really improves stability.

Maybe you should to take a look on that for your new ride.
 
  #4  
Old 01-07-2011
vista4.0's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Beaver Falls, PA
Posts: 2,844
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by fitsector
Don´t know if this is the same in US models, mine is the Latin America Version, but since 2008 the rear shock absorbers was moved from inside of the frame to the outside, just like the current F-150. This really improves stability.

Maybe you should to take a look on that for your new ride.
Nope we didnt get that. Maybe on the 2010s with disc brakes.
 
  #5  
Old 01-07-2011
TheBob's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: 16823
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the help. Anyone want to comment on manual transmissions?
 
  #6  
Old 01-07-2011
djfllmn's Avatar
Ford parts guy
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 6,013
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes on 30 Posts
other than the slave theyre pretty solid
 
  #7  
Old 01-07-2011
winks's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Jackson, New Jersey
Posts: 4,872
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't know if they did anything to fix the slave cylinder, but I can tell you that in my '04 it is still inside of the bell housing. I changed out my clutch at 100,000 miles and the original slave cylinder was still doing its job.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hitman0625
4.0L OHV & SOHC V6 Tech
18
12-28-2023 10:32 AM
Donanoyscott
2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech
15
01-18-2015 05:33 PM
kwtorbe
Suspension Tech
0
11-10-2010 07:06 PM
ringer4x4
4.0L OHV & SOHC V6 Tech
1
05-31-2007 07:26 PM



Quick Reply: Improvements in reliability/durability since 2001?



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:02 PM.