General Ford Ranger Discussion General discussion of the Ford Ranger that does not fit in any other sub-forum.

5.0 vs LS1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 31, 2008
  #26  
Jp7's Avatar
Jp7
Member
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,028
Likes: 17
From: N/A
Originally Posted by 01xltranger4x4
A 4-banger isint going to have to low end torque as a v8 either. Its a TRUCK not a car, we need torque for off road, towing, etc.
My stock "4-banger" has 305 ftlbs of torque at 3500 RPM. I think my truck has 170 ftlbs (3.0 v6). This was before I started playing with boost/timing (now I have 369 ftlbs) - Small motors do have plenty of torque, when done right. There are 2 factors that limit the torque and power capacity of any engine, regardless of displacement:

1 - How much fuel can you get to the engine?

2 - How is the quality of the build of the engine? (forged/cast parts... rotational balance.. ect)

This is why my 2.0 Litre Evo surprises a many "big v8" guys.
 
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2008
  #29  
revo2k11's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
From: MA
and dont turbo motors need premium gas where you could potentially get away with regular for a stock V8
 
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2008
  #30  
chriswells78's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
From: Powell, OH
You would have to be an idiot to put a big turbo 4 banger in a heavy vehicle. I'm sure that is why all the one ton guys are flocking to put 2.0L 4 bangers in their trucks.

Dollar for dollar, pound for pound, ease of fittment and the hours of work involved, you'd be better off with a stroked EFI SBF in a ranger. You could be putting 400hp and 400tq to the ground in less than a week for less than $4000, still be getting 20mpg on the highway and still pass emissions.
 
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2008
  #31  
94greenmachine's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 554
Likes: 1
From: Virginia Beach, VA
Originally Posted by Jp7
My stock "4-banger" has 305 ftlbs of torque at 3500 RPM. I think my truck has 170 ftlbs (3.0 v6). This was before I started playing with boost/timing (now I have 369 ftlbs) - Small motors do have plenty of torque, when done right. There are 2 factors that limit the torque and power capacity of any engine, regardless of displacement:

1 - How much fuel can you get to the engine?

2 - How is the quality of the build of the engine? (forged/cast parts... rotational balance.. ect)

This is why my 2.0 Litre Evo surprises a many "big v8" guys.
Ok, here is the deal. I have sat back and watched this thread develope. I am going to go the route of the LS1, or an LS series engine, NV4500, NP205. I am not throwing a ricer suby engine in my truck. Are you out of your mind. Hell No. My first vehicle was a 98 Nissan 240SX with a SR20DET Black top Swap in. So, I know that arena very well. I refuse to even CONTEMPLATE using those puny engines. I have always said, and will always hold to putting a V-8 up against any 4 banger / 6 banger turbo any day. You can for the same money invested make that V-8 stomp that 4 banger in idle!

Anyways, I stand firm on my V-8 Swap. I appreciate the ideas, and the suggestions for the engines. I don't mind the work involved, as long as I know that the end result will be one BAD *** TRUCK!
 
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2008
  #32  
Urandaman's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,193
Likes: 0
From: wher ever uncle sam wants
i vote briggs and straton...


and no i didnt read the whole thing just the title
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Zjvdwerf12
General Ford Ranger Discussion
4
Jun 11, 2014 02:29 PM
xlt87
8-Cylinder Tech
47
Jul 1, 2011 03:18 PM
Stryker
8-Cylinder Tech
83
Dec 4, 2009 01:39 AM
Biz
General Ford Ranger Discussion
14
Jun 9, 2007 08:18 AM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:14 PM.