Awful gas milage
#126
When I removed my heater control valve (vacuum operated) I plugged the line with a golf T and I never received a code for it, unless the yellow line has some kind of sensor.
I'll also note that after my drive, i took off the gas cap and didn't hear a 'hiss' sound. If this fixes my gas mileage problem without throwing codes, I may just leave it that way.
I'll also note that after my drive, i took off the gas cap and didn't hear a 'hiss' sound. If this fixes my gas mileage problem without throwing codes, I may just leave it that way.
#127
The heater control valve wouldn't have a sensor of any kind _ no need for it.
The 2 wired plug that operates the solenoid on that EVAP purge control valve detects if there is a vacuum leak or if there is no vacuum.
You should get a code eventually, it would be very odd if you didn't.
If you didn't get a code, then there is something certainly not functioning right.
The 2 wired plug that operates the solenoid on that EVAP purge control valve detects if there is a vacuum leak or if there is no vacuum.
You should get a code eventually, it would be very odd if you didn't.
If you didn't get a code, then there is something certainly not functioning right.
#129
I have never heard of NHTSA ordering Ford to update all of the ECM/PCM computers for all pickups back to 1999. I know mine has not had this done and it is ultra clean for the CA emission testing.
You may be right about that but you have also stated a combustion by-product of ethanol is oxygen. So, I question your information sources or interpretation of them because I know oxygen is not a by-product of ethanol combustion. Being a Chemist for over 40 years, I know the products of complete ethanol combustion is CO2 and H2O. Oxygen is consumed in ethanol combustion.
You may be right about that but you have also stated a combustion by-product of ethanol is oxygen. So, I question your information sources or interpretation of them because I know oxygen is not a by-product of ethanol combustion. Being a Chemist for over 40 years, I know the products of complete ethanol combustion is CO2 and H2O. Oxygen is consumed in ethanol combustion.
this was 1 of 2 links posted on msn`s webpage in the auto section
Automakers to gearheads: Stop repairing cars - Autoblog
a second link i cannot find now , the big 3 were in senate hearing regarding several engines of each manufacturer were not meeting the advertised mileage ratings listed the window sticker
ford was on the hot seat because of several after market tuners who were ordered to testify on behalf of them selves
1 specific tuner stated he was able to eck out almost 28 mpg`s out of the 4.0l v6 engine when ford only listed it as 19 mpg ( or close to those numbers ) with his custom tune
ford / chevy / chrysler were testifying back in the spring in senate hearing
especially ford was again on the HOT seat for the 4.0 v6 engine constantly failing emissions testing not to mention fuel economy ratings
but you had to scrolol down to the msn`s auto page to follow the links
#132
#135
I've got (or had) half a tank right on the dot. Didn't go full tank because gas is a bit high right now and I'm pinching pennies. Then reset the trip odo.
So far I've got about 20 miles on it, driving as normal. Still no check engine light, still doesn't smell gassy on startup and she runs fine. I'm hoping I can push 150 out of this half a tank. If I can do that, that tells me I'm on the right track.
if this does fix it, I'll just leave it plugged off. If that fixes it, why buy more parts?
So far I've got about 20 miles on it, driving as normal. Still no check engine light, still doesn't smell gassy on startup and she runs fine. I'm hoping I can push 150 out of this half a tank. If I can do that, that tells me I'm on the right track.
if this does fix it, I'll just leave it plugged off. If that fixes it, why buy more parts?
#137
Granted, I didn't test the valve with voltage to see if it opened, but it did pass the tests my service manual lists. I don't think that part in particular is bad. I think it's something closer to the tank. Either way, it this fixes it, heck yeah. I'll use the black hose that was originally connecting 'em, then stuff some cheap two-cent half inch bolts in there with a couple cheapie hose clamps to seal it off.
Yeah, yeah, environment and all that. But if my truck is more efficient with it disconnected, I say win. Although it makes me wonder, shouldn't pressure be building in the tank with it disconnected from the engine, accompanied by a 'hiss' when the cap is removed?
Here's hoping!
Yeah, yeah, environment and all that. But if my truck is more efficient with it disconnected, I say win. Although it makes me wonder, shouldn't pressure be building in the tank with it disconnected from the engine, accompanied by a 'hiss' when the cap is removed?
Here's hoping!
#138
#139
Granted, I didn't test the valve with voltage to see if it opened, but it did pass the tests my service manual lists. I don't think that part in particular is bad. I think it's something closer to the tank. Either way, it this fixes it, heck yeah. I'll use the black hose that was originally connecting 'em, then stuff some cheap two-cent half inch bolts in there with a couple cheapie hose clamps to seal it off.
Yeah, yeah, environment and all that. But if my truck is more efficient with it disconnected, I say win. Although it makes me wonder, shouldn't pressure be building in the tank with it disconnected from the engine, accompanied by a 'hiss' when the cap is removed?
Here's hoping!
Yeah, yeah, environment and all that. But if my truck is more efficient with it disconnected, I say win. Although it makes me wonder, shouldn't pressure be building in the tank with it disconnected from the engine, accompanied by a 'hiss' when the cap is removed?
Here's hoping!
#140
#141
#142
the fuel filter has 3 ports
fuel pump to filter
filter pressure relief return
filter to engine
if you bought this truck used , the original owner probably mixed up the 2 other nipples
your intake manifold was creating a vacuum and then began drawing fuel from the tank through the evaporative canister , up through the evap hose and into the intake manifold
i remember now , about a guy who owned another jeep cj , he replaced the fuel sender , but mixed up the 2 nipple ports
he connected the evap canister hose to the fuel return nipple , and the fuel return hose to the evap nipple
the fuel return nipple and tube runs down along side the fuel pump pickup tube
fuel pump to filter
filter pressure relief return
filter to engine
if you bought this truck used , the original owner probably mixed up the 2 other nipples
your intake manifold was creating a vacuum and then began drawing fuel from the tank through the evaporative canister , up through the evap hose and into the intake manifold
i remember now , about a guy who owned another jeep cj , he replaced the fuel sender , but mixed up the 2 nipple ports
he connected the evap canister hose to the fuel return nipple , and the fuel return hose to the evap nipple
the fuel return nipple and tube runs down along side the fuel pump pickup tube
#145
#146
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
When Ford switched to the Returnless Fuel system there were a few years that still had the Return line on the fuel tank, these used a 3 line fuel filter, the extra line sent fuel back to tank on the Return line.
#147
#148
#150
Searched around under the truck and didn't find any orphaned lines. Also couldn't find anyone who provides a 3 port fuel filter for my Ranger.
I did, however, realize something. If that evap valve is leaking, it's not going to help me by blocking off the valve's exit. So, I removed the outlet hose entirely and plugged off the evap line going to the valve itself.
Also, no change in mileage as of yet. Sure runs nice though. No gaseous smell either.
I did, however, realize something. If that evap valve is leaking, it's not going to help me by blocking off the valve's exit. So, I removed the outlet hose entirely and plugged off the evap line going to the valve itself.
Also, no change in mileage as of yet. Sure runs nice though. No gaseous smell either.