skyjacker rear springs
#27
Originally Posted by n3elz
Later Rangers have wider springs. My daughter's '98 has narrower springs then my 2002.
I'd check on that closely before buying.
I'd check on that closely before buying.
if they do fit it sounds like i either go with 4" no blocks and chevy shackle
or 6" no blocks and stock shackle.
which one is probably a better setup ? i'm thinking back to stock shackle and the 6" spring cuz it will have better pinion angle, ride a little softer , less chance of spring fatigue?
But i did already pay for a chevy shackle which looks alot stronger and i'll also have a little adjustment in the shackle
#28
Okay, with a that back and forth I got a little confused. So I guess I will just ask you guys straight forward. I have the RCD 5.5" lift and right now I have my truck sitting level (within .5") so if I were to do something with the rear springs what would I do? I just want to get rid of the shackles and try for a better ride. What will give me that?
#29
Originally Posted by n3elz
Later Rangers have wider springs. My daughter's '98 has narrower springs then my 2002.
I'd check on that closely before buying.
I'd check on that closely before buying.
there is a member on here (can't remember his name) that put the Skyjacker lift springs on his '99 Ranger......
#30
#31
Originally Posted by n3elz
My daughter's is 2WD, if it makes a difference. They were definitely narrower.
It also explains the "chevy shackle dilemma" where some find they fit, and some find them too large...
It also explains the "chevy shackle dilemma" where some find they fit, and some find them too large...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post