2.3L & 2.5L I4 Tech General discussion of 2.3L and 2.5L I4 Ford Ranger engines.

MPG question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 8, 2009
  #51  
Johnbaum13's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,343
Likes: 2
From: Dallas, TX
Only if we know how big your tank is. Then to get a rough estimate, multiply the gallons in your tank by .75. Then divide the miles by the resulting number of gallons used.
Or mathematically, m/.75(t)
m=miles traveled, t=gallons in a tank.
This will only be a rough estimate, as the the fuel gauge isn't that accurate.
 
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2009
  #52  
carbuff1991's Avatar
Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
From: Watertown NY
its a 20 gallon
 
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2009
  #53  
carbuff1991's Avatar
Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
From: Watertown NY
so I'm only getting about 14-17 mpg.
 
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2009
  #54  
Johnbaum13's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,343
Likes: 2
From: Dallas, TX
the figures run it at 14.7333333333333333333333333333333333mpg. Asumming it is exactly 15 gallons used.
 
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2009
  #55  
karrbass4life's Avatar
Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,072
Likes: 2
From: Cincinnati, Ohio
Originally Posted by carbuff1991
so I'm only getting about 14-17 mpg.
Is there something wrong with your truck? I shouldn't be getting better mileage than you the way I drive.
 
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2009
  #56  
seth556's Avatar
Member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
From: Orlando FL
Yea thats pretty bad. To calculate I fill up and reset the mileage counter. Then when its empty and I fill up and see how many gallons I used compared to how many miles i did, divide and weep.
 
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2009
  #57  
carbuff1991's Avatar
Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
From: Watertown NY
I drive around a lot in the city late at night with my friends. (they are street racers and it's a battle to keep up with camaro's, T/A's,cobalts and probe GT's)
 
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2009
  #58  
Johnbaum13's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,343
Likes: 2
From: Dallas, TX
You have a hard time keeping up with cobalts and probes?
 
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2009
  #59  
karrbass4life's Avatar
Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,072
Likes: 2
From: Cincinnati, Ohio
If it's a SS Cobalt i understand why, but normal ones? My grandmother got a rental one when her 4.0 Explorer was in the shop. Said it was the slowest POS she had ever driven in her life.

If you want to race buy a SN95 Mustang. I wouldnt be beating the **** out of my daily.
 
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2009
  #60  
carbuff1991's Avatar
Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
From: Watertown NY
the cobalt is a special order car that makes 173 horse and the probe is a v6
 
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2009
  #61  
Johnbaum13's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,343
Likes: 2
From: Dallas, TX
The probe is still slow. And 173hp in a cobalt is slow.
 
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2009
  #62  
carbuff1991's Avatar
Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
From: Watertown NY
my truck only puts out 100 hp
 
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2009
  #63  
Motohead's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: Crystal Lake
My 08 4 cyl automatic with 4:10's gets around 20-21 with an even mix of city-highway driving.
Hey, FX2.3, how did you lower your Ranger? I'm looking to drop 1 1/2 to 2" in front, add sway bars and maybe build an air dam.
 
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2009
  #64  
red_rider's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 346
Likes: 1
From: Port Byron, IL
Originally Posted by Johnbaum13
The probe is still slow. And 173hp in a cobalt is slow.
Actually they're fast if you're trying to keep up in a 93-97 Lima. Even my family's 125 hp Accord is a good bit quicker than my truck. It's all your reference frame.
 
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2009
  #65  
carbuff1991's Avatar
Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
From: Watertown NY
I got an average of 19-20mpg last night in mixed driving.
 
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2009
  #66  
92extcab's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
From: Alvarado, Tx
i get about 300 to 360 depending on how windy it is that week and where i drive but i usally use 18 gallons and then fill up....... and my truck is a snail lol i have to floor it to get to each gear then when im up to speed i can let out and criuse lol.....

john you are the exception lol i think you get so good on gas is your lowered and got a roll pan instead of a back bupmer and your single cab and 5 speed if you was stock with a 5 speed i think you would be average.......

i dont know tho you seem like you dont floor it to often lol you baby it......
 
Reply
Old Apr 16, 2009
  #67  
Johnbaum13's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,343
Likes: 2
From: Dallas, TX
Originally Posted by 92extcab
i dont know tho you seem like you dont floor it to often lol you baby it......
Just ask anybody whose seen me drive or ridden with me........"Baby it" is not in my vocabulary! I got good mileage when I was lowered and still had the bumper. Actually, losing the bumper didn't change my mileage at all. All in all, I think my theory on going faster is what makes the difference. I believe in cutting out as much parasitic loss as possible to free up the most power. So, synthetic lubricants throughout, free flowing exhaust and intake. The hard bed cover has helped the highway mileage the most. Now I am tuned to run premium fuel only, which gave me a very noticeable bump in power, but hasn't affected my mileage at all, except that I floor it a bit more now cause it's more fun ! Still averaging between 27 and 28mpg.
 
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2009
  #68  
red_rider's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 346
Likes: 1
From: Port Byron, IL
Originally Posted by Johnbaum13
Just ask anybody whose seen me drive or ridden with me........"Baby it" is not in my vocabulary! I got good mileage when I was lowered and still had the bumper. Actually, losing the bumper didn't change my mileage at all. All in all, I think my theory on going faster is what makes the difference. I believe in cutting out as much parasitic loss as possible to free up the most power. So, synthetic lubricants throughout, free flowing exhaust and intake. The hard bed cover has helped the highway mileage the most. Now I am tuned to run premium fuel only, which gave me a very noticeable bump in power, but hasn't affected my mileage at all, except that I floor it a bit more now cause it's more fun ! Still averaging between 27 and 28mpg.
Just curious, do you have an underdrive pulley and e-fan? I have a similar mindset as you about efficiency lol, and those were a couple I was thinking of doing.
 
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2009
  #69  
Johnbaum13's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,343
Likes: 2
From: Dallas, TX
Haven't found an under drive pulley for the duratec that I am comfortable with the quality on, and I just have to get the e-fan installed, it's hanging on the wall in the garage.
 
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2009
  #70  
Kenneth S's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, Tx
23 mpg city, 29 hwy
 
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2009
  #71  
Mayguy's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 57
Likes: 2
From: Rochester, MN
Just did my first fill today since I got the truck 2 weeks ago. Truck only has 425 miles, and I got 24 MPG on it. (mixed driving on it)
 
Reply
Old May 2, 2009
  #72  
Mayguy's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 57
Likes: 2
From: Rochester, MN
I have a scan gauge, and we went to my home town (35 miles one way), and my ranger did 34.7 today on round trip..

Set cruise on, 58 mph, rolling country hills/road.
 
Reply
Old May 5, 2009
  #73  
Mayguy's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 57
Likes: 2
From: Rochester, MN
I went to Winona to see my aunt, and stock up on my bottled Coca Cola, and the trip is about 50 miles one way.

I got about 26 MPG on I-90 cruise at 72mph.

I think I am going to stay on the main two lane highway going 57 mph to get my 34 MPG.
 
Reply
Old May 6, 2009
  #74  
Smakes's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
From: nowhere
its odd i used to get about 380 miles out of my 20 gallon tank with my old 205/70/14's and now i get 340 on my new 225/60/16's .. should my mpg have dropped that much?
 
Reply
Old May 6, 2009
  #75  
BlutoBodine's Avatar
Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 543
Likes: 3
From: Tulsa, OK
Originally Posted by Smakes
its odd i used to get about 380 miles out of my 20 gallon tank with my old 205/70/14's and now i get 340 on my new 225/60/16's .. should my mpg have dropped that much?


Wider tire, more rotating mass, and I'm assuming a higher performance stickier tire could all be a factor.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:54 AM.