150 or 160? - Page 2 - Ranger-Forums - The Ultimate Ford Ranger Resource


2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech General discussion of 2.9L and 3.0L V6 Ford Ranger engines.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #26  
Old 03-23-2009
StrangerRanger's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: The 253
Posts: 756
Chilton's rates the 00 3.0l at 195 lbs ft. The 99 is at 190 lbs ft.

But then again they give it 155 hp too. Maybe they round up?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
For Sale: ROCKCRUSHER DANA 44 DRIVE FLANGE 160.00 - UT 93gpt Engine & Drivetrain 2 06-22-2011 05:58 PM
rockford fosgate punch 160.2 or power akcoustik mt520-2 fostina1 Audio & Video Tech 2 02-18-2011 06:09 PM
M4 rail system, VT, 160 buckgnarly Miscellaneous Items 2 07-03-2009 05:53 PM
Bull Bar on CL $160 (Ca) Hanzo Steel Interior, Exterior, Electrical, & Misc. 8 03-21-2009 06:09 PM
E-Fan + 160 t-stat + AC always on = over heating TXranger4x4 General Technical & Electrical 43 07-02-2008 11:43 PM


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:49 AM.


We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.