2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech General discussion of 2.9L and 3.0L V6 Ford Ranger engines.

3.0 hp gain?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 9, 2020
  #1  
JohnyRocket98's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: Carrot Creek
3.0 hp gain?

hey there.
I'm in High School, and am the proud owner of a 98 ranger with a 3.0 litre mated to a 5 speed. Me and my brother love to go dirt biking all the time, but my truck can barely make it up any hills when we've got the 2 bikes in. What would be the best way to improve my hp and/or torque? I was thinking a cam, or maybe a turbo (classic high schooler move), but I'm hoping to some day do a 5 litre swap to my baby, so I don't really wanna put piles of cash into it right now. Any other ideas? If a cam is the way to go, I don't have a clue what kind to put in, and would need some guidance in that as well.
Thanks a pile
 
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2020
  #2  
RonD's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 30,635
Likes: 2,952
From: Vancouver, BC
Welcome to the forum

The 3.0l Vulcan engine is a HIGH RPM engine by design, it makes its best power at 3,700rpms, most engines do that at 2,500rpms

So you need to drive it at high RPMs to get best power, that is the DESIGN, if you drive it like a "regular" engine its very under powered

"Drive it like a rented mule", get up to 4,000rpm in 1st before shifting to 2nd and then keep those RPMs high, it doesn't hurt it, its the DESIGN, its made for it

As for upgrades, no not really anything reasonable
Removing the mechanical fan and using a Electric fan will free up some power(not much) and give better MPG, only thing that can do BOTH

It already has a Cold Air Intake, all fuel injected Rangers do, so skip that

The Torque of an engine is the "power" that gets you going, and up to speed
Horse power is what HOLDS you at that speed

3.0l Vulcan V6 specs
Torque 178 @ 3750 RPM
HP 145hp @ 5000 RPM

2.9l V6
Torque 170 @ 2600rpm
HP 140hp @ 4600rpm
 
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2020
  #3  
Jeff R 1's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 2,023
Likes: 44
From: BC Canada
Like Ron said, it needs to be revved, I drive mine like that all the time.
When you're on the hill, you can't leave it in 5th.
And of course the engine doesn't like to be lugged, you can't drive it like a truck, pretend it's a first generation Miata and it'll work for you.
 
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2020
  #4  
420stackz's Avatar
Member
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 427
Likes: 25
From: Peoria
young buck don't go wasting tons of money on a ranger to try to add +20whp. I'm not even that old but I regret the stupid mods I did in my late teens early 20s trying to make 150hp cars fast. Save up that money instead. Turbos don't drop panties like it used to, but a wallet thick with cash does.
 
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2020
  #5  
vindex1963's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,040
Likes: 1
From: phoenix AZ
I did an underdrive pulley, cat back exhaust and an SCT Super tuner back when I bought the truck new. Changing from 3:73 gears to 4:10 helped more than anything.
 
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2020
  #6  
RonD's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 30,635
Likes: 2,952
From: Vancouver, BC
Yes, the 3.0l Vulcan likes/NEEDS the higher RPMs of higher ratio rear axle gears
 
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2020
  #7  
420stackz's Avatar
Member
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 427
Likes: 25
From: Peoria
Originally Posted by RonD
Yes, the 3.0l Vulcan likes/NEEDS the higher RPMs of higher ratio rear axle gears
save your money and buy a mustang if you need to go fast. Otherwise, recognize its a pickup truck and its gonna be slow. For the 3 grand you spend trying to get 30 horses out of a vulcan, ill go spend 3 grand on a 600 supersport and destroy vettes and lambos (ask me how i know). you gotta play it smart, young buck.
 
Reply
Old Sep 29, 2020
  #8  
vindex1963's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,040
Likes: 1
From: phoenix AZ
I have a Ranger not a Mustang, tomorrow when I want to pass someone I'll be driving my Ranger not a Mustang. I modded my Ranger because that's what I own, a little more power out of the 3.0L is always good and my above mods did just that and no where near $3000. I recently drove my Ranger from here in AZ to Bozeman MT 1092 miles in 16 hours. Climbed the mountain passes in 5th no problem, downshift into 4th to pass a semi, no problem. 16 hours behind the wheel, no problem.
 
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2020
  #9  
Toyota XLT's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2020
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: Ikeja, Lagos
Originally Posted by RonD
Welcome to the forum

The 3.0l Vulcan engine is a HIGH RPM engine by design, it makes its best power at 3,700rpms, most engines do that at 2,500rpms

So you need to drive it at high RPMs to get best power, that is the DESIGN, if you drive it like a "regular" engine its very under powered

"Drive it like a rented mule", get up to 4,000rpm in 1st before shifting to 2nd and then keep those RPMs high, it doesn't hurt it, its the DESIGN, its made for it

As for upgrades, no not really anything reasonable
Removing the mechanical fan and using a Electric fan will free up some power(not much) and give better MPG, only thing that can do BOTH

It already has a Cold Air Intake, all fuel injected Rangers do, so skip that

The Torque of an engine is the "power" that gets you going, and up to speed
Horse power is what HOLDS you at that speed

3.0l Vulcan V6 specs
Torque 178 @ 3750 RPM
HP 145hp @ 5000 RPM

2.9l V6
Torque 170 @ 2600rpm
HP 140hp @ 4600rpm
Hi Ron. Does this suggestions also applies to automatics or its just the manual drives?
 
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2020
  #10  
RonD's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 30,635
Likes: 2,952
From: Vancouver, BC
Its engine specific, the 3.0l Vulcan engine

So yes, automatics are worse unless you manually hold them in the lower gears to get RPMs higher
Ford didn't change the shift points in the 3.0l computer enough to get max power from this engine, probably because users would have complained about the high RPM shift points, lol

3.0l was a very reliable engine, and Ford used it from 1986 to 2008, 22 years, they just ran and ran
 
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2020
  #11  
vindex1963's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,040
Likes: 1
From: phoenix AZ
Originally Posted by RonD
Its engine specific, the 3.0l Vulcan engine

So yes, automatics are worse unless you manually hold them in the lower gears to get RPMs higher
Ford didn't change the shift points in the 3.0l computer enough to get max power from this engine, probably because users would have complained about the high RPM shift points, lol

3.0l was a very reliable engine, and Ford used it from 1986 to 2008, 22 years, they just ran and ran
Friend has a 2005 3.0L with 235,000 miles. belts, hoses and brakes..even the automatic is still going strong.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Gatiņo
General Ford Ranger Discussion
1
Mar 19, 2015 04:29 PM
mitchell561
New Ideas
17
Nov 12, 2013 09:38 AM
Bubblewrap
General Ford Ranger Discussion
36
Jun 25, 2011 02:01 PM
rangerdan
2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech
8
Dec 28, 2007 03:25 PM
Southern4L
General Ford Ranger Discussion
42
Sep 12, 2007 05:46 PM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:14 AM.