2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech General discussion of 2.9L and 3.0L V6 Ford Ranger engines.

best size tubing for exhaust.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 7, 2006
  #1  
johnson's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
iTrader: (-1)
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas, NEVADA
best size tubing for exhaust.

Im doing a side exit exhaust on my 1999 3.0l v6 ranger. Im taking out the cats and putting in a flowmaster 40 series. I just need to know what size flowmaster to get. Is there a plus of having two different sizes of in and out on a flowmaster. Is like 2 inch or 2.5 better, or any size. I dont want it to big to loose back preasure.

thanks for all of your help..
 
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2006
  #2  
rangererv's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,376
Likes: 1
From: Dearborn Michigan
I just got the flowmaster 40's on my truck Single in dual out.
I have 2.5 in and 2.25 going out.

My friend from school has the 3.0 and he said he's got like 3 inch pipes..i dont no if i would go that big tho.
 
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2006
  #3  
Sad_Savant's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 1
From: Shelbyville, Kentucky
not 100%, but i think stock is 2.25"

i'm getting ready to do the same thing to my truck, just with a Borla ProXS, and i'm sticking with 2.25 all the way back
 
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2006
  #4  
Swoop1156's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,965
Likes: 0
From: Hanover, Maryland
Leave the cat's, you'll perform better and have better mileage. Don't argue, search, and do research.

For the 3.0, I'd run about 2.25. I ran 2.25 on my OHV 4.0 and 2.5 on the SOHC..both exited infront fo the rear passenger tire.
 
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2006
  #5  
KARPE's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,748
Likes: 2
From: Valrico, Fl 33594
^x2, dont argue.

2.25 mandrel bent pipes. flowmasters compromise backpressure andgas mileage for sound. unless your point is to be really loud, I'd recommend looking at other mufflers
 
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2006
  #6  
Mr. Special's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,411
Likes: 1
From: Irvine, CA
w/ your 3.0 run 2.25" piping. I disagree w/ the anti flowmasters on the basis that most people get a damn muffler for the sound(atleast on a 3.0 ranger). You wont loose any power over stock using a flow
 
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2006
  #7  
Wertzy's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 672
Likes: 0
From: Warren, Pa
I ran 2.5" pipe from the cat to the muffler, then dual 2.25" piping out the back with 3" tips.

I decided to keep my cats on (have to) and went with a SS Magnaflow muffler. Sounds, and performs great.

PS - If needbe, an exhaust clip is in my sig. :)
 
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2006
  #8  
gatorblue92's Avatar
RF Veteran
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,239
Likes: 3
From: Delaware
keep your cats and use 2.25 inch pipes from the muffler back and 2.5 inch pipes from headers to the muffler... that is what you have stock and it will produce the best sound and performance
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Scrambler82
Fabrication & Tool Tech
5
Jan 2, 2010 10:32 AM
Shaklakan
Fabrication & Tool Tech
1
Sep 20, 2008 12:43 AM
n3elz
Suspension Tech
22
Feb 26, 2008 11:59 PM
redranger_02
General Technical & Electrical
0
Nov 28, 2007 07:03 PM
budwish
Fabrication & Tool Tech
10
May 16, 2006 03:13 PM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:32 AM.