2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech General discussion of 2.9L and 3.0L V6 Ford Ranger engines.

JET Performance Programmers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 23, 2007
  #1  
rangeredge_03's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 594
Likes: 1
From: lubbock,tx
JET Performance Programmers

does any one a JET Performance Programmers
http://store.summitracing.com/partde...=1#Application
if so was it any good or do i need to just stick to an x2
 
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2007
  #2  
Fx4wannabe01's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (23)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 21,721
Likes: 17
From: Boring, Oregon
Xcal2 is the shiznit. If there's anyproblems....you can actually speak one on one with the guy who designed it.
 
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2007
  #3  
t_schloesser's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 739
Likes: 0
From: Palm Beach, FL
i have the jet module.. but i'm switching to the xcal2 as soon as i can. you'll find that MAJORTY of the trucks on here have the rogue.

http://www.stuffforyourranger.com/st...dbce8e18d47e8b

similiar, but more options!
 
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2007
  #4  
UnderdogGN's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: south bend, indiana
whats the difference between the rogue xcal2, and the xcal2 by doug?
are they the same thing or what?
i was looking at the rouge tuner and it didnt list any torque tunes..which is what i am looking for...but it seems as if the doug guy can give you torque tunes with his xcal2?
just a little confused.
thanks
 
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2007
  #5  
rangeredge_03's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 594
Likes: 1
From: lubbock,tx
is the jet module any good because i dont have the money to get that x2 yet
 
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2007
  #6  
Fredness's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 199
Likes: 1
From: Tejas!
The XCal2 is an XCal2, regardless of who you get it from. The difference is in the tunes. HP/Torque/Tow are generic lables for tunes. Whatever you want can be made and if it is specific, a data-log tune will pinpoint the needs. Either way, you'll be much better off and far happier with an XCal2 (from anyone), than with the Jet or other devices.
 
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2007
  #7  
t_schloesser's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 739
Likes: 0
From: Palm Beach, FL
hey tanner, when i started upgrading my ranger when i was in high school, i started with a kn intake, flowmaster, and the jet module. i like it because if you want performance, rpms will go all the way up to 4000ish smothly w/out that annoying pause at 3000. and if you wanna conserve gas, it gives you enough power so you can stay below 2500, during daily driving, and still keep up with traffic.

i guess that smart choice would be to wait, and save $$$ (its only like an extra $100 isnt it?!?!)
 
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2007
  #8  
RangerMuse's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,727
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
I have the Jet and its good, my mpg went down a bit because I cant stay off the throttle though
 
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2007
  #9  
rangeredge_03's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 594
Likes: 1
From: lubbock,tx
well i bought the x2 last week just waiting for it to come in
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
edgerider2002
2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech
4
Feb 21, 2009 08:03 PM
ReconRanger03
4.0L OHV & SOHC V6 Tech
11
Sep 9, 2007 09:31 PM
NinetyEight4.0L
4.0L OHV & SOHC V6 Tech
19
Jul 18, 2007 05:30 PM
zabeard
4.0L OHV & SOHC V6 Tech
19
Jun 29, 2007 04:47 PM
vic
2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech
3
Apr 15, 2007 11:10 PM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:33 PM.