2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech General discussion of 2.9L and 3.0L V6 Ford Ranger engines.

Simple exhaust questions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 10, 2011
  #1  
RANGER_620's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 410
Likes: 1
From: Southpittsburg,Tennessee
Simple exhaust questions

Whats the difference in running a si/do muffler and useing a Y-pipe after the si/so mufflers? and what size pipe should i use 2.25 or 2.5? I heard 2.5 would mess my low end torque up but i really dont know that muck about it
 
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2011
  #2  
djfllmn's Avatar
Former Ford Parts Monkey
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 6,105
Likes: 56
From: PA
i had both on my truck and the SI/DO has a more uniform sound from both tailpipes...when i had the SI/SO and the Y-pipe the one pipe sounded a little different than the other..and i dont notice any difference in torque with the 2.5 inch piping
 
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2011
  #3  
CBrooks89's Avatar
Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
From: Burton, MI
i have SI/SO with a 2.5 in pipe and i didnt notice a change in torque
 
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2011
  #4  
RANGER_620's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 410
Likes: 1
From: Southpittsburg,Tennessee
[QUOTE=djfllmn;1824943]i had both on my truck and the SI/DO has a more uniform sound from both tailpipes...when i had the SI/SO and the Y-pipe the one pipe sounded a little different than the other..and i dont notice any difference in torque with the 2.5 inch piping[/QUOT

So what do prefer?
 
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2011
  #5  
djfllmn's Avatar
Former Ford Parts Monkey
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 6,105
Likes: 56
From: PA
the SI/DO with the 2.5'' piping
 
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2011
  #6  
SconnieHailer's Avatar
Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin
i have a 2000 flex 3.0 and get 19 mpg with a thrush welded si/so chamber muffler 2.25 inches. thats going 60 mph. and 16-18 in and around townish, sounds really good and rough/mellow btw... i do take meticulous care of my truck though so that might have something to do with my mpg. also i had a straight through dynomax ultraflow 2" and i lost upper power but got a little noticable lower end tq. not enough for me to keep it though... good luck, these ranger cause a chronic search for perf parts man, its rediculous, i feel like i should just upgrade to a f150 but cant bear losing my little buddy :)
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
abq02ranger
Suspension Tech
9
May 6, 2010 07:10 PM
DillonT
General Ford Ranger Discussion
7
Mar 18, 2008 01:00 PM
Badfish
Suspension Tech
25
Nov 16, 2006 01:01 AM
shuckyd
Drivetrain Tech
19
Aug 2, 2005 08:27 AM
pacodiablo
Audio & Video Tech
11
Jun 25, 2004 08:49 AM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:51 AM.