Why did you buy a 3.0?
#80
#81
Originally Posted by graniteguy
When I started buying Rangers I thought the 3.0's WERE the big engine. Seriously.
On my 4th Ranger I finally opted for a 4.0 4x4 and there were none in Austin out of 400 or so Rangers in stock at 4 Dealers.
Someone correct me, but I think the 3.0 was designed and is built in the US, the 4.0 is German or Italian or something like that. Another reason to get the 3.0.
On my 4th Ranger I finally opted for a 4.0 4x4 and there were none in Austin out of 400 or so Rangers in stock at 4 Dealers.
Someone correct me, but I think the 3.0 was designed and is built in the US, the 4.0 is German or Italian or something like that. Another reason to get the 3.0.
All the more reason I would want a 4.0 instead of a 3.0. I dont really care though its not like the 4.0 has a huge ammount of power anyways. 4.O FTW
#82
#83
Because I dont have a large enough ego to have a 4.0 sohc. My dad has a 4.0 ohv and it seems to be a decent motor. it has decent power but im the last one laughing at the gas pump. the slave clyinder took a crap on his truck so i pulled him home with my vulcanator about 5 miles without a problem
#85
#87
#89
#90
Originally Posted by RangerEdgeO2
I bought it because I couldn't find a truck with what I wanted w/ a 4.0 on any dealer lot plus, a buddy of mine told me that the 3.0 will last 2-3x longer than the 4.0.
My salesguy actually owned a Ranger w/ a 3.0 (manual tranny though) so I figured there must be something good about them if he had one.
My salesguy actually owned a Ranger w/ a 3.0 (manual tranny though) so I figured there must be something good about them if he had one.
#91
#92
Originally Posted by Mark98xlt
compared to the 2.3 duratech it gives the 3.0 a run for its money gas and power wise.
Last edited by mj550; 10-23-2007 at 09:18 PM.
#94
#95
#96
Actually You would think its the opposite in terms of engine life.
Smaller engines do infact usually last longer, but the reality is that when they are placed in heavy/large vehicles, they are forced to struggle and suffer far more strain than larger engines.
A 4.0 can easily chug along a ranger, and not even break a sweat, but a 3.0 would most likely struggle a little when pushing it, and thus creating more heat/friction/wear and tear.
Its like have a 6'2 200lb man pushing a wheel barrel full of bricks up a hill, at the end he will probably be slightly winded. Try the same thing with a 4'5 95lb manand you will probably need a medic.
The 3.0 is still a solid engine though.
Smaller engines do infact usually last longer, but the reality is that when they are placed in heavy/large vehicles, they are forced to struggle and suffer far more strain than larger engines.
A 4.0 can easily chug along a ranger, and not even break a sweat, but a 3.0 would most likely struggle a little when pushing it, and thus creating more heat/friction/wear and tear.
Its like have a 6'2 200lb man pushing a wheel barrel full of bricks up a hill, at the end he will probably be slightly winded. Try the same thing with a 4'5 95lb manand you will probably need a medic.
The 3.0 is still a solid engine though.
#98
#99
because that's what came in the truck when I got it for cheap off of a friend
although my favorite posted reasons are:
-I'm an idiot
-I didn't know
-I thought a V6 = it's not a 4-cyl! this thing will kick ****!
-4 cylinder performance, V8 gas mileage (that's right, I got ~ the same gas mileage as my friend w' a 4.6LV8)
although my favorite posted reasons are:
-I'm an idiot
-I didn't know
-I thought a V6 = it's not a 4-cyl! this thing will kick ****!
-4 cylinder performance, V8 gas mileage (that's right, I got ~ the same gas mileage as my friend w' a 4.6LV8)