2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech General discussion of 2.9L and 3.0L V6 Ford Ranger engines.

Why did you buy a 3.0?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #76  
Old 08-21-2007
vindex1963's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: phoenix AZ
Posts: 3,040
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
You 4.0 guys sure like to brag.

Maybe the 3.0 is slow because it's saving up for 250,000 miles.
 
  #77  
Old 08-22-2007
l2en's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: The Keystone State
Posts: 4,521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by redranger4.0
because you wanted the power of a 4cyl and the gas mileage of a 6 cyl?
ROFL!!
 
  #78  
Old 08-22-2007
Mark98xlt's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Parma Ohio
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by vindex1963
You 4.0 guys sure like to brag.

Maybe the 3.0 is slow because it's saving up for 250,000 miles.
that wasnt my case.
 
  #79  
Old 08-22-2007
vindex1963's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: phoenix AZ
Posts: 3,040
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Mark98xlt
that wasnt my case.
and.......
 
  #80  
Old 08-22-2007
GrafixGuy's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Montgomery, AL
Posts: 8,703
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by redranger4.0
because you wanted the power of a 4cyl and the gas mileage of a 6 cyl?
PShhhh... ever drove a 4 cyl? if you haven't... you don't have no idea... the 3.0 is like a s/c 2.3L to me... maybe I'm just happy and satisfied...
 
  #81  
Old 08-22-2007
02rangerguy's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: r
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by graniteguy
When I started buying Rangers I thought the 3.0's WERE the big engine. Seriously.

On my 4th Ranger I finally opted for a 4.0 4x4 and there were none in Austin out of 400 or so Rangers in stock at 4 Dealers.

Someone correct me, but I think the 3.0 was designed and is built in the US, the 4.0 is German or Italian or something like that. Another reason to get the 3.0.

All the more reason I would want a 4.0 instead of a 3.0. I dont really care though its not like the 4.0 has a huge ammount of power anyways. 4.O FTW
 
  #82  
Old 08-22-2007
Mark98xlt's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Parma Ohio
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by 07SPORT
PShhhh... ever drove a 4 cyl? if you haven't... you don't have no idea... the 3.0 is like a s/c 2.3L to me... maybe I'm just happy and satisfied...
compared to the 2.3 duratech it gives the 3.0 a run for its money gas and power wise.
 
  #83  
Old 10-21-2007
Toreador4x4's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Livonia, MI
Posts: 3,958
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Because I dont have a large enough ego to have a 4.0 sohc. My dad has a 4.0 ohv and it seems to be a decent motor. it has decent power but im the last one laughing at the gas pump. the slave clyinder took a crap on his truck so i pulled him home with my vulcanator about 5 miles without a problem
 
  #84  
Old 10-21-2007
mazda98's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: dalton,ga.
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
because it was affordable,and i liked the truck
 
  #85  
Old 10-22-2007
volcompro11's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
umm because my first truck w/ 4.0 blew up at 150k... I miss the power tho, but I'm at 180k right now & still goin strong. If were to buy a 08 ranger today I'd go with a 4.0... way more fun to drive, & you can actually tow somethin with it
 
  #86  
Old 10-22-2007
Jazz921's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Evansville, IN
Posts: 997
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LOL, i just liked the truck, didnt matter if it was a 3.0 or a 4.0. ALthough, I just pulled home another Ranger (bout 200 miles) and had no problems.
 
  #87  
Old 10-22-2007
cowboy63645's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Fredericktown, Missouri
Posts: 813
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ibought mine because I wanted a motor that would last a long time as well as get good gas mileage....When I bought the truck, I was driving 150 miles round trip per day. It is a little slow, but it gets me where I need to go and a few places I shouldnt have been lol
 
  #88  
Old 10-22-2007
Fredness's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Tejas!
Posts: 199
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
1994 truck, bought it in 1997 from the original owner. Didn't know there was a 4L, I only knew the choice was V-6 or I-4, I went V6. Never regretted it.
 
  #89  
Old 10-22-2007
bryce-man's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: beach cities,CA
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
cause it used to be a representation truck for my dads company and they wanted a bigger one so i got this one...
love it .. but when i get more set inlife im dropping atleat a 302 in it
(by that time my best friend will be ASE certified and yeah .. id have money hahah)
 
  #90  
Old 10-23-2007
MTLaccord's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RangerEdgeO2
I bought it because I couldn't find a truck with what I wanted w/ a 4.0 on any dealer lot plus, a buddy of mine told me that the 3.0 will last 2-3x longer than the 4.0.

My salesguy actually owned a Ranger w/ a 3.0 (manual tranny though) so I figured there must be something good about them if he had one.
Actually, the salesguys ussually drive around whatever is not selling, but still good call on getting the 3.0
 
  #91  
Old 10-23-2007
vindex1963's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: phoenix AZ
Posts: 3,040
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by MTLaccord
Actually, the salesguys ussually drive around whatever is not selling.
Always somebody to bring a brother down. Real ray of sunshine aren't you.
 
  #92  
Old 10-23-2007
mj550's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mark98xlt
compared to the 2.3 duratech it gives the 3.0 a run for its money gas and power wise.
my friend has an 01 2.3 and that thing is so damn slow. He has gotten beat by 2.2L s10s and those are slow as hell to. I let him take off infront of me giving it all hes got and I can take off and just go around him like its nothing. However, im sure he'd do a lot better than what he does if he had lower gears and a manual.
 

Last edited by mj550; 10-23-2007 at 09:18 PM.
  #93  
Old 10-24-2007
Edgeman2wd's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Stanton, CA
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
bought it used and I wanted a edge. A 3.0 was all I could find
 
  #94  
Old 10-24-2007
UnderdogGN's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: south bend, indiana
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
because its a sweet truck! supercab 4x4 for a real good price...looks good and is supposed to last forever.
if i wanted i powerful truck i would buy an F350 diesel or a lighning...
 
  #95  
Old 10-26-2007
mx2007's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Lancaster,CA
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I got one because i had no choice lol,it was that or nothing,i dont think there too bad just needs some work to make it badass.it has potential,plus i like the size of the truck its not too big.
 
  #96  
Old 11-05-2007
rangerdex's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: NY
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Actually You would think its the opposite in terms of engine life.
Smaller engines do infact usually last longer, but the reality is that when they are placed in heavy/large vehicles, they are forced to struggle and suffer far more strain than larger engines.

A 4.0 can easily chug along a ranger, and not even break a sweat, but a 3.0 would most likely struggle a little when pushing it, and thus creating more heat/friction/wear and tear.

Its like have a 6'2 200lb man pushing a wheel barrel full of bricks up a hill, at the end he will probably be slightly winded. Try the same thing with a 4'5 95lb manand you will probably need a medic.

The 3.0 is still a solid engine though.
 
  #97  
Old 11-08-2007
oldirtyfrito's Avatar
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: somich, Mi
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I love my 3.0 ihave put about 155k on it and have never had to replace anything but plugs wires and oil i would def buy another
 
  #98  
Old 11-09-2007
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Redlands,CA
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well the guy who sold me the truck told me it was a 4.0, which i had no idea either way. I previously had a Dodge Ram 1500 Hemi, and just assumed the ford 4.0 was slow as dirt. Didnt know any better. Come to find out that in 2006 the 3.0 was used in 89% of all rangers.
 
  #99  
Old 11-24-2007
Bhavesh's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: City, State
Posts: 507
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
because that's what came in the truck when I got it for cheap off of a friend

although my favorite posted reasons are:
-I'm an idiot
-I didn't know
-I thought a V6 = it's not a 4-cyl! this thing will kick ****!
-4 cylinder performance, V8 gas mileage (that's right, I got ~ the same gas mileage as my friend w' a 4.6LV8)
 
  #100  
Old 11-24-2007
Rolldogg's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 3,424
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
It came with the truck.....LOL
 


Quick Reply: Why did you buy a 3.0?



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:44 PM.