4.0L OHV & SOHC V6 Tech General discussion of 4.0L OHV and SOHC V6 Ford Ranger engines.

Best performance mufflers for 4.0

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 01-25-2010
cucukid124's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: lebanon township, NJ
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Best performance mufflers for 4.0

Im lookin for the best performance muffler to put on a 4.0. i hear that borla and magnaflow are pretty good.

Any others?
 
  #2  
Old 01-25-2010
DSFD506's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Anderson, SC
Posts: 704
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You're gonna get alot of different answers and choices on this one. It's all about what sounds good to you. Personally I only like the sound of Flowmaster on a Ranger.
 
  #3  
Old 01-26-2010
rangerrick's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Columbia NJ
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Borla, Magnaflow, and Gibson, have an aggressive sound on V8's, 4.0's aren't going to sound anywhere near as good as say a V8 would sound.
Little confused here kid, didn't you just purchase the F150 like a month or so ago? So why are you selling it now?
 
  #4  
Old 01-26-2010
Alex98's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Baltimore, Maryland
Posts: 949
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Flowmasters are better for v-8's imo but I have a dynomax super turbo...
 
  #5  
Old 01-26-2010
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Plattsburgh, New York
Posts: 3,390
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I have the magnaflow full cat back, borlas are sick but the bassani's sound kick a$$...
 
  #6  
Old 01-26-2010
cucukid124's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: lebanon township, NJ
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rangerrick
Borla, Magnaflow, and Gibson, have an aggressive sound on V8's, 4.0's aren't going to sound anywhere near as good as say a V8 would sound.
Little confused here kid, didn't you just purchase the F150 like a month or so ago? So why are you selling it now?
part time deli job + 8 MPG + dumb purchase by me = need new solution

and for the mufflers im not looking for overall sound, i really want something that will make it perform better even a cat back system im not basin this off overall sound quality
 
  #7  
Old 01-26-2010
Tys 4x4 FTW's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 6,575
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
don't go slowmaster. they are restrictive. although do sound great.

i originally had a flowmaster. liked it. but wanted something different. i could actually feel it holding the truck back.

went with a straight through magnaflow muffler. and had custom mandrel bent 2.5" piping from the cat back and i noticed a very small difference in the higher RPM's. not much ,but its something at least. and its dumped right after the muffler . sounds great.
 
  #8  
Old 01-26-2010
cucukid124's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: lebanon township, NJ
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
magnaflow is in the top for me, you felt the difference even with the 35's?
 
  #9  
Old 01-26-2010
rangerrick's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Columbia NJ
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thats actually pretty good, 8 mpg with those size tires. Those trucks have a thirsty appetite to start with. Fuel ecnomy got a little better after 02, but not by that much. I get 9-10mpg with my 8.1.

You won't notice any performance gains with the 4.0 by doing the exhaust, you want performance gains you go with a super charger, that is if you have the $$$$ for it. If you like the look of a performance exhaust, then go with stainless steal mandrell bent T -304, other wise you are wasting your money by not choosing a SS system, cause they will last only about 4 years tops. My friend has a gibson on his 2500 and you can definately feel the gains with it. The muffler itself is as big as the stock muffler if not slightly bigger and has all mandrel bends. Very good cat back system.
 
  #10  
Old 01-26-2010
evilclown312's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Logan ohio
Posts: 2,772
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I have the magnaflow on my truck and love it! I would never put a Flowmaster on my truck!
 
  #11  
Old 01-26-2010
cucukid124's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: lebanon township, NJ
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ya rick i hear ya, i guess im just lookin for simple mods once i get it nothin major yet thanks though for the advise, you been wheelin lately?
 
  #12  
Old 01-26-2010
brianjwilson's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Hillsboro, Oregon
Posts: 3,650
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
I don't think you'll get much performance out of exhaust on a ranger either, but I would go with a straight through magnaflow. Magnaflow sounds great and is not restrictive like flowmaster.
I had a magnaflow catback on a VR6 (2.8L) Jetta and now on a 2.5L turbo Subaru, they both sound awesome.
 
  #13  
Old 01-26-2010
cucukid124's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: lebanon township, NJ
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i guess now the question is, whats the best for gas milage? haha
 
  #14  
Old 01-26-2010
--weezl--'s Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Calgary AB, Canada
Posts: 3,139
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Tys 4x4 FTW
don't go slowmaster. they are restrictive. although do sound great.

i originally had a flowmaster. liked it. but wanted something different. i could actually feel it holding the truck back.

went with a straight through magnaflow muffler. and had custom mandrel bent 2.5" piping from the cat back and i noticed a very small difference in the higher RPM's. not much ,but its something at least. and its dumped right after the muffler . sounds great.
what differences are we talking, mpg wise? like a 1mpg loss?
 
  #15  
Old 01-26-2010
07Sport4x4's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Mount Vernon, WA
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I find 4.0L and great fuel economy to not be very compatible. Proper/good tire pressure made the most noticable gains for me . . . and it cost me nothing.
 
  #16  
Old 01-26-2010
Melt's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 3,392
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
straight pipe it!
 
  #17  
Old 01-26-2010
KLC's Avatar
KLC
KLC is offline
RF Veteran
iTrader: (29)
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 13,115
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Go with Magnaflow.

Originally Posted by 07Sport4x4
I find 4.0L and great fuel economy to not be very compatible. Proper/good tire pressure made the most noticable gains for me . . . and it cost me nothing.
I consistently get 16-17 MPG in the city. Pretty good if you ask me.
 
  #18  
Old 01-26-2010
--weezl--'s Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Calgary AB, Canada
Posts: 3,139
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
over 1300 miles, i averaged 16.6 mpg, but have gotten as high as 23mpg on some tanks (not used in the calculation of the 16.6)

i don't particularly want to lose the mileage that i do get... but 1-2 mpg is less than i can lose by driving habits for less than 1/4 of my tank...
 
  #19  
Old 01-26-2010
cucukid124's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: lebanon township, NJ
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i got 15 with the 95 i had 4x4 ill be lookin to put 32's on it and maybe 4:10's so she dont be laggin everywhere, the new truck i mean
 
  #20  
Old 01-26-2010
Melt's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 3,392
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by KLC
Go with Magnaflow.



I consistently get 16-17 MPG in the city. Pretty good if you ask me.
the ohv 4.0s get worse mileage than the sohc's
 
  #21  
Old 01-26-2010
Tys 4x4 FTW's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 6,575
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by --weezl--
what differences are we talking, mpg wise? like a 1mpg loss?
im saying i felt the diffrence in the seat of my pants
 
  #22  
Old 01-26-2010
brianjwilson's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Hillsboro, Oregon
Posts: 3,650
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Melt
the ohv 4.0s get worse mileage than the sohc's
I could get 18mpg in our old 97 ex 4x4 with stock tires on the highway. Not all that bad depending on driving technique.
 
  #23  
Old 01-26-2010
KLC's Avatar
KLC
KLC is offline
RF Veteran
iTrader: (29)
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 13,115
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Melt
the ohv 4.0s get worse mileage than the sohc's
The person who I quoted has an SOHC.
 
  #24  
Old 01-26-2010
--weezl--'s Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Calgary AB, Canada
Posts: 3,139
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Tys 4x4 FTW
im saying i felt the diffrence in the seat of my pants
you felt a loss of power in the seat of your pants?
 
  #25  
Old 01-26-2010
rangerrick's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Columbia NJ
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cucukid124
ya rick i hear ya, i guess im just lookin for simple mods once i get it nothin major yet thanks though for the advise, you been wheelin lately?
No, i missed the last few trips my buddies went to in PA. Some of them are way to ballsy and will go out on the ice and do donuts and what not. They don't realize if that ice cracks their trucks and perhaps their lives are at stake cause some of those quarry lakes are deeeep. I don't take my trucks out on the ice, at least not ice that has deeper water then my tires. You want some serious mud to play it, you go to Treverton PA. They have miles or mud holes to play in.
 


Quick Reply: Best performance mufflers for 4.0



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:05 AM.