Finally drove a newer 4.0L V6-a 2008! -IMPRESSED
#27
#30
#32
#34
#36
When I test drove a Ranger back in January, I was very impressed with the truck overall. But the price tag was not that great, which is why I still have mine.
$500 a month in payments JUST FOR THE TRUCK (Insurance would have been $250, because I did have an accident on my record) was a little much.
$500 a month in payments JUST FOR THE TRUCK (Insurance would have been $250, because I did have an accident on my record) was a little much.
#37
Nope. It's the tranny that would take a dump. Wayne has gone through a couple so he installed a GM non computer controlled auto. https://www.ranger-forums.com/forum2...ad.php?t=42428
.
.
my deal was a small drip out the rear of the tranny and I didn't top off the fluid. It eventually had to give. I towed a lot with the manual, including another mini truck to the dragstrip. It did the job. When it did go, I figured I'd do the auto cause of the tow ratings. I wish I hadn't. I never got that auto tranny to shift right.
#38
#44
Unregistered User
Posts: n/a
I've run close to 125 on mine ( on a dyno, I have a Centerforce DF clutch ) no issues at all.
#45
Weird how this became a transmission thread.
I pulled over 3500lbs with the manual on my 98 ranger also, and it was "okay" when it got moving.
The tow rating is low because they have weak internals, a small clutch, and a tall first gear. Getting the truck/trailer combo moving from a dead stop up hill sucked big time.
The auto in my sport trac has been great so far, ever since I got the Xcal 2 and firmed up the shifts and such. Pulled a loaded up 6x14 enclosed trailer from Oregon to Kentucky. Shifted great all the way through, and with a bigger cooler it peaked once or twice at 200 degrees, and that was at the top of some mountains in Utah/Wyoming. Had I done that with the ranger I'd be replacing the clutch and tranny by now for sure.
I pulled over 3500lbs with the manual on my 98 ranger also, and it was "okay" when it got moving.
The tow rating is low because they have weak internals, a small clutch, and a tall first gear. Getting the truck/trailer combo moving from a dead stop up hill sucked big time.
The auto in my sport trac has been great so far, ever since I got the Xcal 2 and firmed up the shifts and such. Pulled a loaded up 6x14 enclosed trailer from Oregon to Kentucky. Shifted great all the way through, and with a bigger cooler it peaked once or twice at 200 degrees, and that was at the top of some mountains in Utah/Wyoming. Had I done that with the ranger I'd be replacing the clutch and tranny by now for sure.
#47
heat is not a critical enemy of manual transmissions. futhermore, i don't think it would be possible, or atleast realistic to install a cooler on a manual. a manual transmission does not have a fluid pump as an automatic does.
there generally speaking are not many upgrades for manual transmissions. they are usually just strong, or just not. they can be upgraded, but not in the same way automatics are upgraded.
if you have a weak auto, it can usually be built to strong specs. if you have a weak manual, and you want a strong one, swap to a different model.
there are always exceptions though...
there generally speaking are not many upgrades for manual transmissions. they are usually just strong, or just not. they can be upgraded, but not in the same way automatics are upgraded.
if you have a weak auto, it can usually be built to strong specs. if you have a weak manual, and you want a strong one, swap to a different model.
there are always exceptions though...
#48
I love my spec stage 2. It slips when it needs to(wheeling/towing), something i've heard the Centerforce has issues doing(too grabby).
Back on topic...I rode in a '08 4.0L 4x4 w/5spd manual....was very impressed. I forgot what being pushed back in the seat really felt like(thanks 28" tires!). lol.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
lifted97ranger
Drivetrain Tech
17
02-13-2008 09:41 AM
04lvl2
General Ford Ranger Discussion
37
05-15-2006 10:30 AM