4.0L OHV & SOHC V6 Tech General discussion of 4.0L OHV and SOHC V6 Ford Ranger engines.

high flow cat?

Old Nov 9, 2008
  #1  
06fx4jb83's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
From: east hartford,ct
high flow cat?

this weds im having my flowmaster super 44 put on my gibson dual swept side exhaust, the flowmaster is a 3 inch inlet/2.5 inch outlet. I want to put on some high flow cats, which size inlet/outlet should i get and how many high flow cats should i get? thanks again guys
 
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2008
  #2  
whippersnapper02's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,415
Likes: 4
From: Earth, Milky Way Galaxy
Save your money. The stock cats flow well.
 
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2008
  #3  
zabeard's Avatar
who?
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 10
From: IN
with that flowmaster its not gonna matter. the stock cats are pretty high flow, that flowmaster is just slowing down that flow.

go with wide open performance from Magnaflow.
 
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2008
  #4  
06fx4jb83's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
From: east hartford,ct
would the high flow cats help with the sound?
 
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2008
  #5  
06fx4jb83's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
From: east hartford,ct
not to get off subject a lil bit, but i seen in your profile that you got 4 wheel disc brakes , i would like the same on my truck, where u get your discs?











/
 
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2008
  #6  
Toreador4x4's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,958
Likes: 3
From: Livonia, MI
Your stock cats will do just fine, if you want the best quality of sound, you will have to run no cats, not sure if you can in your state
 
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2008
  #7  
06fx4jb83's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
From: east hartford,ct
nope
 
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2008
  #8  
XeRo's Avatar
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
From: Here, Now...Ohio
The cars that need high flows are from around pre 99. Save your money.
 
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2008
  #9  
robert99ranger's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,809
Likes: 4
From: Indiana/Mississippi
Wouldn't running no cat turn on your check engine light?
 
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2008
  #10  
XeRo's Avatar
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
From: Here, Now...Ohio
no, you can get an adapter for the o2's that will make it go away. Your rear cat reads that there is more air flow and throws the light saying that there is a problem with the cat.
 
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2008
  #11  
robert99ranger's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,809
Likes: 4
From: Indiana/Mississippi
Ok, so if you did not buy the adapter thing then it would through a code right?
 
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2008
  #12  
Jp7's Avatar
Jp7
Member
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,028
Likes: 17
From: N/A
Originally Posted by XeRo
no, you can get an adapter for the o2's that will make it go away. Your rear cat reads that there is more air flow and throws the light saying that there is a problem with the cat.
The cat dosent read anything. The oxygen sensors do the 'reading'. The ECU looks at the signal coming from the AFR signal in front of the converter and compares it to the signal from behind the converter. The AFR for the rearward sensor should be a higher value due to the fact the catalyst is there. If you want to remove your converter you will be reducing back pressure and losing less torque during the exhaust stroke. To fool the rear sensor into thinking you have a cat simply use 2 spark plug defoulers in series and screw the sensor into those. This will prevent your ECU from detecting the cat is missing and you will not throw a code. The big benefit from this mod is not back pressure, it is that you can safely advance your timing more than if you had a cat and also run a leaner mixture without worrying about knock.. To take advantage of this you must retune your ECU, no if ands or butts.
 
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2008
  #13  
robert99ranger's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,809
Likes: 4
From: Indiana/Mississippi
I think he meant O2 sensor not the actual cat.
 
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2008
  #14  
zabeard's Avatar
who?
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 10
From: IN
it doesnt matter what the computer reads, most of those states do a sniff test if i remember correctly.

also from what i can tell exhaust size, shape, and bends effect sound the most.
 
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2008
  #15  
robert99ranger's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,809
Likes: 4
From: Indiana/Mississippi
I am glad Indiana doesn't because I know some of my previous vehicles would not have passd. So how does it go? The more bends the ..... it is? The bigger it is the ..... it is?
 
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2008
  #16  
Jp7's Avatar
Jp7
Member
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,028
Likes: 17
From: N/A
Originally Posted by zabeard
it doesnt matter what the computer reads, most of those states do a sniff test if i remember correctly.

also from what i can tell exhaust size, shape, and bends effect sound the most.
If the vehicle is OBD2 equipt then it will be done via computer test. As far as I hear, only CA may use a sniffer test.

The whole idea of going to OBD2 in 1996 was to make emissions testing easier. I had my truck tested a few months ago, the test was 100% computer and took less time than the drive in at mcdonalds.

My car also passes, and no - I don't have a cat. No codes = pass.
 
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2008
  #17  
zabeard's Avatar
who?
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 10
From: IN
im sure it varies per state, all i know is Indiana doesnt care one bit about emissions, unless its visually smoking.
 
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2008
  #18  
Jp7's Avatar
Jp7
Member
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,028
Likes: 17
From: N/A
Originally Posted by zabeard
im sure it varies per state, all i know is Indiana doesnt care one bit about emissions, unless its visually smoking.
I'm in the evo-forums all the time, where probably 50% of the population is cat-less. I think there would be more b!tching and moaning if this was the case. Remember we are talking about post-obd2 here (1996 and up).

I don't even think anyone makes a bolt-on midpipe for the ranger. Most sportscars have them available for "offroad" use only on various websites. You'd have to put something together yourself. Seems like alot of work for someone who's just doing it for sound.

Remember that converters are only useful when the AFR is somewhat close to stoich. When you floor it in your truck the engine is heavily loaded and the ECU goes to a much richer tune. In this stage, your cat is basically doing nothing. This is why sometimes I use a tailpipe sniffer when I tune a car that still has a converter - all the adjustments are made to the WOT map, not the cruising map. (openloop vs closed) - The point of this is that you will get some "smoking" when you floor it because its richer on purpose. The ECU isn't even considering this operation because the oxygen sensors arent even being paid attention too, it only uses the sensors on the front side of the system.
 
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2008
  #19  
zabeard's Avatar
who?
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 10
From: IN
well im hear to tell ya, been there, kinda tried it. sounds like crap, runs like it too.

I am running 2 high flow magnaflow cats one per bank and it runs pretty good but not worth the cost IMO.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jaycheetwood
4.0L OHV & SOHC V6 Tech
14
Oct 3, 2008 08:54 PM
INT3RC3PTOR
8-Cylinder Tech
12
Jul 12, 2008 07:14 AM
04fx4
General Ford Ranger Discussion
4
Jun 29, 2008 09:33 PM
crawly1025
4.0L OHV & SOHC V6 Tech
7
Jan 17, 2008 08:35 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:39 PM.