4.0L OHV & SOHC V6 Tech General discussion of 4.0L OHV and SOHC V6 Ford Ranger engines.

Screamin' Demon Coil Packs

Old Jan 30, 2011
  #1  
VH5150's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Level III Supporter
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 834
Likes: 3
From: Rutland VT
Screamin' Demon Coil Packs

Ant thoughs? I've heard both good and bad things about them on 4.0 Cammers. Some people swear by them, others say OE is the better choice.
Thanks
MikeR
 
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2011
  #2  
korey89's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,672
Likes: 6
From: South, FL
The one on my 3.0 was definitely an improvement and the people at the company are very nice. I'd recommend them in a second
 
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2011
  #3  
powerranger262's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,222
Likes: 2
From: Hartford, WI
I've also been looking into them and have only heard that they don't do squat and it does make sense. They are made more for a higher revving RPM that I don't think you will ever feel in a 4.0. Plus, it's recommended to upgrade your wires which adds more cost to something you are not going to really feel, except in your head and wallet.
 
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2011
  #4  
VH5150's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Level III Supporter
iTrader: (9)
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 834
Likes: 3
From: Rutland VT
I found them on special at Underdog Performance for $59.00-I'm pretty sure that that's cheaper than I can get OE for. I'm ready for plugs and wires anyway.
MikeR
 
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2011
  #5  
rcmustang's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 185
Likes: 1
From: Los Angeles
I just installed the 4.0 ohv coil pack in mine and gapped the plugs to .060. I didn't go with the full .064 because of the blower. The first tank of gas since I installed it went from an average of 19 to 21 mpg so far.
 
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2011
  #6  
powerranger262's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,222
Likes: 2
From: Hartford, WI
$59? Go for it then, that's cheap as hell.
 
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2011
  #7  
RLong31's Avatar
The Ban Hammer
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,594
Likes: 2
From: Monrovia, IN
I've just always been leary of going any different than stock on plugs and wires. Gapping different gives better mpg and more hp?
 
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2011
  #8  
rcmustang's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 185
Likes: 1
From: Los Angeles
The theory is with a bigger gap and a stronger spark, you will get a more complete burn of the air/fuel mixture=more energy used. More power, better mileage. Unburned fuel=less efficiency. I'm a big supporter of Iridium plugs too.
 
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2011
  #9  
cheese_man's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,126
Likes: 6
From: arthur
there is no sense installing a a more powerful ignition coil if you are still using highly resistive spark plug wires

get yourself a good set of taylor LOW OHM resistance ignition wires 1st

then upgrade to the deamon coil pack at a later date
 
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2011
  #10  
rcmustang's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 185
Likes: 1
From: Los Angeles
X2 on the Taylors. I run the PRO 409's on my Mustang.
 
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2011
  #11  
Alex98's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 949
Likes: 1
From: Baltimore, Maryland
i use the coil pack on my sohc and it works fine, i love it lol.
 
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2011
  #12  
RLong31's Avatar
The Ban Hammer
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,594
Likes: 2
From: Monrovia, IN
^^ any actual gains?
 
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2011
  #13  
Alex98's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 949
Likes: 1
From: Baltimore, Maryland
the seat of the pants feeling is the worst way to see gains, but i have no actual proof as far as gains as i have not dyno'd my truck. i would like to think i have gains tho.
 
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2011
  #14  
Johnny Mac's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
From: Angola NY
Installed a demon in my truck using MSD super conductor wires and platinum ford plugs. Gapped to .063. Slight gas mileage increase, but the main thing i noticed was more stability of RPMs. Real smoothe. And i paid $100 for mine. Bugger.
 
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2011
  #15  
StratGT's Avatar
Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
From: Mississauga
Originally Posted by rcmustang
I just installed the 4.0 ohv coil pack in mine and gapped the plugs to .060. I didn't go with the full .064 because of the blower. The first tank of gas since I installed it went from an average of 19 to 21 mpg so far.
Are you sure that's wise when running a supercharger?? Run the recommended spark plug gap when supercharging any vehicle, it's nothing like the stock Ford spec. Look at the gap on a Ford Lightning and compare it to a stock f-150 with the same engine and same model year truck....I believe it's .032 on a Lightning (1 heat range colder) and .058 and the same stock motor. I've seen major damage with the Mustang guys when running stock gap on a supercharged Stang.
 
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2011
  #16  
rcmustang's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 185
Likes: 1
From: Los Angeles
I've had no misfires or any other ignition issues. That's why I went to .060 and not .065. I've got an MSD DIS 4 coming as added insurance. As far as the heat range, I'm also running a H20/methanol injection system. I don't have any detonation either. I've had plenty of experience with supercharged Mustangs. And yes I ran smaller gaps with those. If the ignition is strong enough run as big as you can til the boost can blow out the spark and then go back down. The amount of boost would also be a factor. Once you reach a certain level, then definitely you would have to go back down on the gap. You have to experiment to find the best settings.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
lifted97ranger
4.0L OHV & SOHC V6 Tech
178
Aug 22, 2019 10:19 PM
cornfed89
General Ford Ranger Discussion
0
Jul 15, 2010 09:43 PM
Jwad00
2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech
13
Sep 7, 2009 07:35 PM
impure
4.0L OHV & SOHC V6 Tech
40
Oct 1, 2008 03:31 AM
vansnxtweek
4.0L OHV & SOHC V6 Tech
1
Nov 8, 2006 06:10 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:03 PM.