Drivetrain Tech General discussion of drivetrain for the Ford Ranger.

1989 ranger bad rear HELP!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 3, 2011
  #1  
ffemtjaydoc's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: mays landing,NJ
1989 ranger bad rear HELP!!!

hello all, im a newbie to the ranger world, ive been a mechanic for roughly 7 years but today i may have made a bad decision. i bought a 1989 ranger thats lifted 8 in on 35s but it has a bad rear, i only paid 600 bucks for it and i hope it wasnt a bad idea, now the question. will an rear out of a 1997 ranger fit this truck? if so i will only be in the truck for 700 bucks!!! please let me know asap thanks in advance
 
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2011
  #2  
94Ranger355's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 616
Likes: 4
From: Athens, TN
Icon14 Ah huh...........

Originally Posted by ffemtjaydoc
hello all, im a newbie to the ranger world, ive been a mechanic for roughly 7 years but today i may have made a bad decision. i bought a 1989 ranger thats lifted 8 in on 35s but it has a bad rear, i only paid 600 bucks for it and i hope it wasnt a bad idea, now the question. will an rear out of a 1997 ranger fit this truck? if so i will only be in the truck for 700 bucks!!! please let me know asap thanks in advance
==========================================
Should be a "direct swap", just be sure is has the same gearin!
 
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2011
  #3  
rpwillix's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
From: king george virginia
It should...i think sometime in the late 80's or early 90's they changed overall width like an inch or so. I found all that kinda info on the ranger station i think it was when i swapped axles in my old truck.
 
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2011
  #4  
StxDangerRanger's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 6,315
Likes: 8
From: Michigan
it will swap in no problem.
 
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2011
  #5  
ffemtjaydoc's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: mays landing,NJ
Icon14

thank you guys so much you are awesome! this is already a great forum i guess i made a good deal, ill keep you all posted with pics of the install!!
 
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2011
  #6  
ffemtjaydoc's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: mays landing,NJ
now hopefully i can get the rear off the guy tomorrow and have it up and running by monday!
 
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2011
  #7  
oldcarfart's Avatar
Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 49
Likes: 1
From: Clinton, SC
Originally Posted by ffemtjaydoc
now hopefully i can get the rear off the guy tomorrow and have it up and running by monday!
if the new rear has disc brakes you need correct master cylinder and prop/combo valve.
 
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2011
  #8  
buckgnarly's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (11)
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,709
Likes: 0
From: West Topsham, VT
Hate to burst everyone's bubble, but look again, the widths are different from 89 to 97....

Axle Width Differences:

People have asked about the widths of axle shafts to swap shafts from one axle to another.

The early 1983-1992 Ranger axles are 1-inch shorter than the 1993-up pieces (Both sides). This means that the an entire Ranger axle assembly from 1993-up is 2-inches wider than 1983-1992.

The right side Bronco II axle shaft is 1-5/8" wider than the 1983-1992 Ranger shaft. All of this additional width is on the passenger side. The drivers side shaft is the same length in either axle assembly.

On ALL Ranger/Bronco II's the drivers side axle shaft is longer than the passenger side.

There is no difference between 7.5 & 8.8 axle shaft lengths provided you stay in the same year window.

As a note, if you go to a salvage yard, you may find the left-side shafts removed from 1983-1992 Rangers and Bronco II's. These axle shafts are the same length as the axle shafts in the "Fox" (1979-1993) Mustangs EXCEPT that Ranger/bronco II shafts are five-lug and Mustangs are four lug. Ranger/Bronco II shafts are frequently "pillaged" for use in converting a Mustang to five-lug wheels.



Might bolt in depending on spring perch width differences, but it's not the same axle. If you are going wider anyway and running 35's, might just want to get a 95 or later (for rear discs) Explorer axle for the strength of the 31 splines.
Look here for more info...

http://www.therangerstation.com/tech_library/Axles.html

The Ranger Station is a great site for good info.....
 
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2011
  #9  
94Ranger355's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 616
Likes: 4
From: Athens, TN
Post ^^^^^^^

There is a wideth difference, but the spring perches are in the same location, as I put a 88 Bronco II 7.5 L/S in my Son's 93, and it was a "direct bolt-in".......pics are with 15X8 Ultra 50/51's:
Name:  925d6bfc.jpg
Views: 320
Size:  76.9 KB

Name:  AthensCruise-In7-21-0710750pix.jpg
Views: 372
Size:  85.5 KB
 
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2011
  #10  
ffemtjaydoc's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: mays landing,NJ
thanks but that will not matter since my ranger is lifted 8 inches on 35s! might actually look better lol, but i will be going with the explorer rear as soon as i can find one, this one will work for now, pictures to come
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
josefiction
General Technical & Electrical
3
Apr 30, 2017 11:23 AM
Free89BroncoII
Suspension Tech
14
Jun 26, 2008 07:54 PM
LayingFrame89
Ranger Products, Company, & Member Reviews
34
Dec 1, 2007 06:59 AM
ranger
General Ford Ranger Discussion
32
Jul 31, 2007 11:50 AM
FMD
General Ford Ranger Discussion
13
Apr 25, 2006 07:21 AM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:12 PM.