Drivetrain Tech General discussion of drivetrain for the Ford Ranger.
View Poll Results: 4.56s ? or 4.88s ?
4.56s ?
23
85.19%
4.88s ?
4
14.81%
Voters: 27. You may not vote on this poll

35s and what gears?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 1, 2005
  #1  
zabeard's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
who?
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 10
From: IN
35s and what gears?

i know i cant go any bigger than 4.88s in the front.
i have 4.10s now. i want to run either 4.56 or 4.88 but i want the same final ratio as i had with stock 30.8(somewhere in there) and 4.10s.

i pull a trailer and its usually pretty heavy.. 3.5k lbs or more. yet at the same time i go on long trips and drive some highway. i have 53K miles and counting.

so im a little concered about gas mileage... but at the same time i think if i regear... i should still get respectable gas mileage.



this is out in the dark something ive never really understood... but if i can create the same final drive ratio as with stock setup wouldnt i get simular gas mileage?


idk im just looking for opinions..
 
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2005
  #2  
Gearhead61's Avatar
RF Veteran
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 5,782
Likes: 2
From: College Station, TX
Isn't there a way to calculate what gears you shold come up with? I remember reading about it somewhere but I can't for the life of me think where right now. I'll look around for it. I'd say go with 4.56 though. Something about 4.88 just seems pretty extreme to me.
 
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2005
  #3  
Roach2004's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (3)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,320
Likes: 3
From: Houston, TX
My 35's will be here on thursday and the lift next week I am regearing to 4.56's
 
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2005
  #4  
SuperGildo@RRP's Avatar
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,753
Likes: 0
From: PUEBLO, CO
(new size / old size) x current ratio= projected ratio. then round to nearest size.


IE (35/31)x4.10=4.6290. nearest ratio, 4.56...
 
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2005
  #5  
zabeard's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
who?
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 10
From: IN
Originally Posted by SUPERGILDO
(new size / old size) x current ratio= projected ratio. then round to nearest size.


IE (35/31)x4.10=4.6290. nearest ratio, 4.56...

awesome... thanks gilberto

btw you could have told me that the other day lol
 
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2005
  #6  
SuperGildo@RRP's Avatar
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,753
Likes: 0
From: PUEBLO, CO
sorry i had to do a little crunching, i didnt remember it exactly...
 
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2005
  #7  
zabeard's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
who?
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 10
From: IN
its ok... now everyone can look it up and get the info
 
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2005
  #8  
Roach2004's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (3)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,320
Likes: 3
From: Houston, TX
So you getting 35's too?
 
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2005
  #9  
a311fanam's Avatar
Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,006
Likes: 0
From: Westerly, RI
4.56's will be fine, 4.88's may be alittle lower then it was with stock gears/tires
 
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2005
  #10  
zabeard's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
who?
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 10
From: IN
Originally Posted by Roach2004
So you getting 35's too?

maybe
 
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2005
  #11  
Roach2004's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (3)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,320
Likes: 3
From: Houston, TX
Didnt you just buy some buckshot 33's! How you like them tires I will have mine here on thursday!
 
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2005
  #12  
zabeard's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
who?
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 10
From: IN
i love them... ill be getting them in 35s


woops...



spring time
 
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2005
  #13  
SuperGildo@RRP's Avatar
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,753
Likes: 0
From: PUEBLO, CO
M
 
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2005
  #14  
SuperGildo@RRP's Avatar
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,753
Likes: 0
From: PUEBLO, CO
T
 
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2005
  #15  
SuperGildo@RRP's Avatar
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,753
Likes: 0
From: PUEBLO, CO
/
 
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2005
  #16  
zabeard's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
who?
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 10
From: IN
Originally Posted by supergildo
m
M?

Mt/r ? oh or those... havnt decided... but iwant to try them mt/rs
 
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2005
  #17  
SuperGildo@RRP's Avatar
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,753
Likes: 0
From: PUEBLO, CO
R's...
 
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2005
  #18  
zabeard's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
who?
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 10
From: IN
Originally Posted by SUPERGILDO
R's...

i can read minds
 
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2005
  #19  
Ranger1's Avatar
Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,115
Likes: 2
From:
With your auto tranny 4.56's should be plenty. I have a hard time getting it rolling from a stop at the bottom of a hill and with a load. You would have an easier time with your auto tranny. So with my stick shift and me planning on towing often I am going for 4.88's. Really I think if I had an auto tranny and was not going to tow often I think 4.10s would be plenty with a 4.0L.
 
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2005
  #20  
034x4's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 0
From: Acworth, GA
www.4lo.com
 
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2005
  #21  
Redneckstone's Avatar
Level III Supporter
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 24,936
Likes: 11
From: usa
ya 4.56 should be good. and about spring time you want me to start on the special front end project....ehem... maybe something to house something made by warn
 
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2005
  #22  
zabeard's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
who?
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 10
From: IN
anyone have input on gas mileage with 4.56s?





Originally Posted by Redneckstone
ya 4.56 should be good. and about spring time you want me to start on the special front end project....ehem... maybe something to house something made by warn
lol maybe... im still thinking on that one
 
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2005
  #23  
V8 Level II's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,910
Likes: 27
From: Michigan
Originally Posted by zabeard
anyone have input on gas mileage with 4.56s?
As Gil pointed out, the 4.56's with the 35's will bring your engine RPMs at any given speed back to near stock. However, your fuel economy will be noticeably reduced by the aero and rolling drag of the larger/wider tires and by their extra weight. The lift is a negative, too.
 
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2005
  #24  
Ranger1's Avatar
Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,115
Likes: 2
From:
I am getting like 14-15 so you can expect less with 4.56's
 
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2005
  #25  
zabeard's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
who?
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 10
From: IN
Originally Posted by rwenzing
As Gil pointed out, the 4.56's with the 35's will bring your engine RPMs at any given speed back to near stock. However, your fuel economy will be noticeably reduced by the aero and rolling drag of the larger/wider tires and by their extra weight. The lift is a negative, too.
but at the same time wont it help out my acceleration which will allow the engine to work a lot less, and would help gas milage, or is this just something that i think would work but its not. lol
 
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:17 AM.