Drivetrain Tech General discussion of drivetrain for the Ford Ranger.
View Poll Results: 4.56s ? or 4.88s ?
4.56s ?
23
85.19%
4.88s ?
4
14.81%
Voters: 27. You may not vote on this poll

35s and what gears?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 2, 2005
  #26  
V8 Level II's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,910
Likes: 27
From: Michigan
Originally Posted by zabeard
but at the same time wont it help out my acceleration which will allow the engine to work a lot less, and would help gas milage, or is this just something that i think would work but its not. lol
No, because increasing the tire diameter has the same effect as installing a numerically lower gear ratio. By upping the tire diameter and increasing the axle ratio by the about same multiplier, the overall relationship of engine RPM to vehicle speed remains about the same. That means that the torque applied at any given combination of road speed, gear, throttle position and engine RPM is about the same.

The whole point of changing the axle gear ratio is to make up for the torque loss caused by installing the larger diameter tires.

The issues of road friction, aerodynamic drag and tire mass are separate from the gear ratio calculation. No matter what you do, the larger/wider tires and lift create greater frictional losses that must be overcome by energy produced in the engine. Also, the additional mass of those big tires must be accelerated any time the road speed increases. For any given acceleration rate, the engine supplies more energy to the drive train to change the speed of the heavier tires.

And, of course, all of that energy comes from the chemical energy of the gasoline used.
 
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2005
  #27  
zabeard's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
who?
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 10
From: IN
ok, that helps... i wasnt thinking into it that hard i guess
 
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2005
  #28  
Big04Ranger's Avatar
Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 756
Likes: 0
From: Avon, IN
i have 35s and 4.56 i get between 15-19 all the time. all city is normally 16 and highway from indy to muncie to see the GF i get about 17-18 at 65-70 mph... im thinkin of goin 4.88s on mine as im gonna be buying some 37x12.50 truxus MTs when i can afford them.. so if i do that ill let ya know and you can get a sweet deal on a set of 4.56 front and rear... and yes i have all of the tools and knowledge to install them in a timely manner at the moment there is only about 9k on the gears.


remember im only bout 2 hrs south of you
 
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2005
  #29  
zabeard's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
who?
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 10
From: IN
sweet. ya let me know i may be interested!
 
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2005
  #30  
BlkTremor02's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
From: Victor, NY
Zach, I usually get 15-16 MPG with my 35s, 4.88, and S/C on my 3.0...It's the same when I had my 33s, 4.10 and Non-S/C..
 
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2005
  #31  
zabeard's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
who?
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 10
From: IN
sounds liek if i was to regear and run 35s my mpg wouldnt be that bad at all.
 
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2005
  #32  
Big04Ranger's Avatar
Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 756
Likes: 0
From: Avon, IN
and i can still kick the crap outa them damn wanna be ricers around here





by wanna be i mean the guys that just toss a fart cannon on then do the "show" mods
 
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2005
  #33  
zabeard's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
who?
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 10
From: IN
did you run 4.56s with 33s?
 
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2005
  #34  
Redneckstone's Avatar
Level III Supporter
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 24,936
Likes: 11
From: usa
Originally Posted by zabeard
did you run 4.56s with 33s?
oh ya it would be about the same as when you where running 4.10's with your stock tires if you can remeber that far back LOL
 
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2005
  #35  
zabeard's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
who?
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 10
From: IN
Originally Posted by Redneckstone
oh ya it would be about the same as when you where running 4.10's with your stock tires if you can remeber that far back LOL


mmm sounds like fun.
 
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2005
  #36  
fletch12518's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,262
Likes: 0
From: Havre De Grace,Md
Im getting 4:56's with 35's. shouldnt be too bad
 
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2005
  #37  
Big04Ranger's Avatar
Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 756
Likes: 0
From: Avon, IN
i did run the 4.56 with 33s.. it was noticable and i didnt really notice a drop off when i tossed the 35s on
 
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2005
  #38  
zabeard's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
who?
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 10
From: IN
mpg changes with the 33s and 4.56s?

i plan on 35s but i might not have them when i get gears.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
craigs2869
Drivetrain Tech
14
Oct 7, 2011 02:32 AM
MugenCRX04
Drivetrain Tech
31
Sep 15, 2009 10:40 PM
vansnxtweek
Drivetrain Tech
28
Mar 25, 2008 10:11 PM
shadow905
Drivetrain Tech
35
Mar 29, 2007 05:10 PM
HighRollerII
Drivetrain Tech
4
Jun 3, 2004 09:05 AM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:34 AM.