Drivetrain Tech General discussion of drivetrain for the Ford Ranger.

4.10s or 4.56s?

Old Jun 24, 2011
  #1  
RANGER_620's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 410
Likes: 1
From: Southpittsburg,Tennessee
4.10s or 4.56s?

I want to regear my truck soon due to losing power/mpg, but im not sure what to get...would i be better with 4.56s?
 
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2011
  #2  
04RangerDave's Avatar
JDM> RANGER
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 5,031
Likes: 3
From: RI
Wirelessly posted

You'll loose a **** ton on 4.56
 
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2011
  #3  
RANGER_620's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 410
Likes: 1
From: Southpittsburg,Tennessee
lol thats what i figured. How much did you lose when you went to 4.56s?
 
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2011
  #4  
98liftedranger's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 12,538
Likes: 4
From: California
Wait what? Lose power going to a lower gear? With 33's the 4.56's will put you close to stock gearing.
 
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2011
  #5  
RANGER_620's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 410
Likes: 1
From: Southpittsburg,Tennessee
The power would be ok,but what about the mpg? Now im confused...
 
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2011
  #6  
djfllmn's Avatar
Former Ford Parts Monkey
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 6,105
Likes: 56
From: PA
what gears do you currently have?
 
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2011
  #7  
01_ranger_4x4's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,585
Likes: 9
From: Muskegon, Michigan
4.56's are ideal with 33's. youll probably gain a little bit in mileage too.
 
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2011
  #8  
RANGER_620's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 410
Likes: 1
From: Southpittsburg,Tennessee
Originally Posted by djfllmn
what gears do you currently have?
3.73s with the stock 7.5
Originally Posted by 01_ranger_4x4
4.56's are ideal with 33's. youll probably gain a little bit in mileage too.
Good im working on trying to get my mpg back. Im picking up some seafoam next week probably. Then gears and UD pulleys when i get the money lol.
 
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2011
  #9  
djfllmn's Avatar
Former Ford Parts Monkey
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 6,105
Likes: 56
From: PA
4.10s wouldnt be a bad way to go either but 4.56s would be better...might have to do a rear end swap though...idk if you can regear a 7.5
 
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2011
  #10  
RANGER_620's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 410
Likes: 1
From: Southpittsburg,Tennessee
You can i found the gears for the rear end earlier. Made by G2 or something like that lol
 
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2011
  #11  
djfllmn's Avatar
Former Ford Parts Monkey
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 6,105
Likes: 56
From: PA
learn something new every day
 
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2011
  #12  
04RangerDave's Avatar
JDM> RANGER
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 5,031
Likes: 3
From: RI
Wirelessly posted

With 4.56 I got. 13 all around. On the highway at 65mph I was at 4000rpm.

I'm assuming you have 3.73s. If your on 33s 4.10 is plenty
 
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2011
  #13  
RANGER_620's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 410
Likes: 1
From: Southpittsburg,Tennessee
lol here's something for me to learn...do i have a dana35 front end? never really looked or thought about it
 
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2011
  #14  
04RangerDave's Avatar
JDM> RANGER
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 5,031
Likes: 3
From: RI
Wirelessly posted

98 I lost mpg not power
 
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2011
  #15  
01_ranger_4x4's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,585
Likes: 9
From: Muskegon, Michigan
Originally Posted by 04RangerDave
Wirelessly posted

With 4.56 I got. 13 all around. On the highway at 65mph I was at 4000rpm.

I'm assuming you have 3.73s. If your on 33s 4.10 is plenty
There is no way you run 4000 RPM at 65 MPH with 4.56's. I run 2700 RPM at 70 MPH with my 4.56's, exactly the same RPM I ran at that speed with the stock 4.10's. The OP's truck is a 3.slow so it needs all the help it can get and 4.56's will do the trick. An under geared truck means the engine has to work that much harder to keep momentum which uses more gas. Lugging along at the lowest RPM possible isnt always the best thing for mileage.
 
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2011
  #16  
98liftedranger's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 12,538
Likes: 4
From: California
This thread is full of bad info from certain people. 4.56's will be perfect. Listen to Patrick as he has that set up and do a search if you don't believe him or I.
 
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2011
  #17  
04RangerDave's Avatar
JDM> RANGER
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 5,031
Likes: 3
From: RI
Wirelessly posted

I reved at 4k on 31s
 
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2011
  #18  
RANGER_620's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 410
Likes: 1
From: Southpittsburg,Tennessee
Originally Posted by 01_ranger_4x4
There is no way you run 4000 RPM at 65 MPH with 4.56's. I run 2700 RPM at 70 MPH with my 4.56's, exactly the same RPM I ran at that speed with the stock 4.10's. The OP's truck is a 3.slow so it needs all the help it can get and 4.56's will do the trick. An under geared truck means the engine has to work that much harder to keep momentum which uses more gas. Lugging along at the lowest RPM possible isnt always the best thing for mileage.
Dave's running 31's tho i can understand him at 4000 RPM

Thanks for help man, im on 33s to but im in the 3.slow lol so ill be at about 2500 RPM at 70 MPH?
 
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2011
  #19  
legoms013's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 280
Likes: 1
From: Loomis CA
Agreed, lots of bad crappy info here.

If you are regearing, only do it once. 33's, and the 3.0L with 4.56's will be a MUCH better choice than 4.10's. Your mileage should even pick up a bit too.

The 3.0L is rev happy anyway, a few extra is nothing to worry about and will hurt your mileage way less than if you went with 4,10s (which are too steep still).

4.88's would actually be an even better choice than 4.56's.....the 3.0L needs all the gearing it can get. 4.56's for 33's on the 4.0L is actually a bit much, but on the 3.0L its only adequate. Most charts will suggest 4.88's for the 3.slow.

DO NOT FEAR THe RPM! Your 3.0L will thank you later..

See here for some good info:

http://therangerstation.com/forums/showthread.php?t=15

The reason most people who posted LOST mileage they say is not because they went with 4.10's or 4.56's, its because they DIDN"T go with 4.88's. With 33's and 4.10's or 4.56's, the motor is still being overworked....

And OP, you have the standard cut, low pinion IFS D35. It came with the torsion bar setup in 1998. 93-97 had the TTB high pinion reverse cut rotation D35 radius arm setup.
 

Last edited by legoms013; Jun 24, 2011 at 09:46 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2011
  #20  
RANGER_620's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 410
Likes: 1
From: Southpittsburg,Tennessee
That link helps alot lol
 
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2011
  #21  
Masteratarms93's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 4,685
Likes: 5
From: Goose Creek SC
Originally Posted by 04RangerDave
Wirelessly posted

I reved at 4k on 31s
Lol 4.56s on 31s is a big fail. Unless you do lots of mud boggin and rock crawlin. Everyday.
 
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2011
  #22  
legoms013's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 280
Likes: 1
From: Loomis CA
Originally Posted by 04RangerDave
Wirelessly posted

You'll loose a **** ton on 4.56
Originally Posted by 04RangerDave
Wirelessly posted

With 4.56 I got. 13 all around. On the highway at 65mph I was at 4000rpm.

I'm assuming you have 3.73s. If your on 33s 4.10 is plenty
Originally Posted by 04RangerDave
Wirelessly posted

I reved at 4k on 31s
I'm not sure where you guys are getting the 4000rpm number @ 65mph. This can't be. The only way it could is if you were running 5.71's. I know you weren't sooo....exahheration much? Me thinks yes.

Crusing RPM @ 65mph for 31's & 4.10's/4.56's will be around 2900/3220 respectively with OD OFF. Those are typical RPM's, and will be 15-30% lower with OD on. Normal operating RPM's.

Look here: and 'splain yourself:

http://www.therangerstation.com/tech...tirechart.html
 

Last edited by legoms013; Jun 24, 2011 at 11:04 PM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Scrambler82
Drivetrain Tech
37
Nov 16, 2013 09:29 PM
pwrranger88
OLD - Engine & Drivetrain
12
Jan 26, 2011 07:22 AM
06fx4jb83
Drivetrain Tech
30
Jan 1, 2009 08:13 PM
Urandaman
Drivetrain Tech
15
Feb 28, 2008 04:30 PM
zabeard
Drivetrain Tech
58
Jun 15, 2006 08:01 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:05 AM.