Drivetrain Tech General discussion of drivetrain for the Ford Ranger.

4.56's for 285's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 4, 2007
  #1  
mersingt's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
From: Apex nc
4.56's for 285's

what do you think??
 
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2007
  #2  
Red_Ak_Ranger's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 17,221
Likes: 4
No =]
 
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2007
  #3  
Redneckstone's Avatar
Level III Supporter
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 24,936
Likes: 11
From: usa
those are for 35's 410 is good for 33's that is if you have a 4.0L
 
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2007
  #4  
Red_Ak_Ranger's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 17,221
Likes: 4
he has a 4.0 4wd and that's a lotta dinero just to get a bit of speed back and hurt your gas mileage and whatnot.
 
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2007
  #5  
doc's Avatar
doc
Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,406
Likes: 0
From: Media, PA
I had 4.10 on my 285's and I still did 90 very easily... Not needed.
 
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2007
  #6  
rolla_guy72's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,256
Likes: 0
From: Fairbanks, AK
You'oll porbably get better gas mileage with the 285s and 4.10s
 
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2007
  #7  
rdy4mud's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
From: Howell, NJ
yeah the 4.56's is a little extreme
 
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2007
  #8  
lifted97ranger's Avatar
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1
Likes: 4
From: Charlestown, IN
i bout laughed.........

NO......you will get somewhere around 10mpg because of the engine screaming......not to mention you probably wont be able to keep traction....
 
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2007
  #9  
redranger04g's Avatar
Member

iTrader: (2)
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 927
Likes: 0
From: Placentia, CA
dont do it
 
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2007
  #10  
mersingt's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
From: Apex nc
dont you use 4.56's for 33 1250's ??? is that just for the weight of the extra width....
 
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2007
  #11  
Pinecone's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 0
From: Fayetteville, NC
285 are essentially a 33 for a 16" rim. 33's and 4.10's are ample. My 33's on my 3.0 w/ a few mods was ample.
 
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2007
  #12  
Lord Of War's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,606
Likes: 4
From: Thornton, Colorado
stay with 4.10's they have plenty of power.
 
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2007
  #13  
bryanjints's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 2
From: Mount Holly, NJ
I run 4.56's with 33's but the TSL's are a rugged tire and don't roll very nicely not to mention the rims I have are very heavy. The 4.56's give me the acceleration I wanted and great power off road. I barely have to floor it any more. At least I have needed to floor it yet I am sure they are going to get me into more difficult situations in the future.
 
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2007
  #14  
Red_Ak_Ranger's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 17,221
Likes: 4
Originally Posted by bryanjints
I run 4.56's with 33's but the TSL's are a rugged tire and don't roll very nicely not to mention the rims I have are very heavy. The 4.56's give me the acceleration I wanted and great power off road. I barely have to floor it any more. At least I have needed to floor it yet I am sure they are going to get me into more difficult situations in the future.
I have noticed that in 4lo, my torque is insane. I have climbed my truck up massive snowbanks with only a tiny bit of throttle. I always wondered if it was 4.10 gearing, the engine, or 4lo that had the most pronounced effect.

Note in the pic below that my truck is on 35s, so the headlights arent near the ground.

 
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2007
  #15  
bryanjints's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 2
From: Mount Holly, NJ
in 4low my trucks power is more than I ever imagined it would be. I will show the power I had I know that with my 3.73's he was not get out of this hole by my truck.






His truck wouldn't start and that mud had him suctioned in there. I had to pull him out without any help.
 
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2007
  #16  
ryan21c21's Avatar
Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: Omaha, NE
Don't listen to them man, go ahead and do it, I mean you will never have to worry about another speeding ticket again. lol
 
Reply
Old Aug 5, 2007
  #17  
Red_Ak_Ranger's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 17,221
Likes: 4
yah and you wont want a speeding ticket, since you paid $600 to regear your truck.
 
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2007
  #18  
casfz1's Avatar
Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,989
Likes: 0
From: southgate, mi
I say do it. Look at a stock truck they come with anything from a 235x75 to a 31" tall tire and come with 4:10's and now you are running a 33" tall tire which puts you out of your powerband. A 4:27 or a 4:56 gear will put you back to within factory specs and since they do not make a 4:27 gear for our front axle then that makes the 4:56 the only choice to bring it back to stock.

with all that said you can run a 33" tall tire with 4:10's with no problems but you will not have the stock performance. Also as some people have stated you may get a little better gas mileage but that also really depends on how much your new 33's weigh because if they are heavy then your gas mileage will go down trust me.
 

Last edited by casfz1; Aug 6, 2007 at 12:22 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2007
  #19  
doc's Avatar
doc
Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,406
Likes: 0
From: Media, PA
Yeah but with a 4.56 he will have no top end speed.... Or at 65 he will be at 4000 or 5000 rpms
 
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2007
  #20  
TommyC's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,012
Likes: 2
From: CA
There's a lot of variables that no one knows or has even bothered to ask which would effect the optimal gear ratio.

1) Is this a daily driver?
2) How much freeway driving is there?
3) What is the top speed you travel?

Some people over at http://www.offroadrangers.com/forum have 32s & 4.56 gears, so you may want to checkout what they have to say about it.

Originally Posted by doc
Yeah but with a 4.56 he will have no top end speed.... Or at 65 he will be at 4000 or 5000 rpms
That seems a bit exaggerated. I'm about 2.5K @ 65 MPH. I doubt a .26 change in gear ratio would double his RPMs...
 
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2007
  #21  
casfz1's Avatar
Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,989
Likes: 0
From: southgate, mi
Doc in over drive he would be right around 3000 rpm's at 65 mph with a 1:1 gear ratio in the trans so with a over drive trans he would be even less. here is the chart that i used.
 

Last edited by casfz1; Aug 26, 2008 at 02:47 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2007
  #23  
t_schloesser's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 739
Likes: 0
From: Palm Beach, FL
i blew out my rear end w/ 31's so i had 4.56 put it... its sucks on the free way, but i did it so in the future i can put bigger tires on. i would recommend 4.10's. at 70mph i'm at 3k rpm. but thats not the problem. when my speedometer reads 70, i'm doing around 60. so my stock governer is 95, in reality, around 80. (which causes trouble driving on the Florida Turnpike daily)
 
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2007
  #24  
ranger's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,502
Likes: 2
From: Imperial Beach, CA
i had 4.56s with 32s and i got about 12mpg if i was lucky. and the power was awsome. um i topped out at about 85mph. was it worth it? hell yea
 
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2007
  #25  
red_fx2's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: lakeland, fl
tim how'd u blow out ur rearend with 31's?
 
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:54 AM.