Drivetrain Tech General discussion of drivetrain for the Ford Ranger.

running 33's with 3.73 gears

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 28, 2008
  #1  
billabong98z's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis
running 33's with 3.73 gears

i finally got my tires and am running it with the 3.73 gears and i gotta say it runs absolutely FINE.... seriously not much different than it did stock.... i see absolutely no need to spend $500+ to regear
 
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2008
  #2  
Downey's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,470
Likes: 6
From: Muncy, PA
thanks you i have been trying to tell people that for a long time but no one out believe me
 
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2008
  #3  
04blackedge's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (13)
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 23,426
Likes: 8
From: Durham, NC
What motor? I would hate to see what my 3.0 would do with 33s and 3.73s
 
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2008
  #4  
Woods-Rider's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,108
Likes: 2
From: Hillsboro, OR
then dont regear
 
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2008
  #5  
Ranger_Guy15's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,827
Likes: 3
From: MN
Yea what engine do you have?
 
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2008
  #6  
marcua56's Avatar
Member
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 301
Likes: 1
From: omaha
I think he has a 3.0 looking at his other posts.
 
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2008
  #7  
04blackedge's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (13)
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 23,426
Likes: 8
From: Durham, NC
Manual or auto?
 
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2008
  #8  
marcua56's Avatar
Member
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 301
Likes: 1
From: omaha
im guessing auto
 
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2008
  #9  
marcua56's Avatar
Member
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 301
Likes: 1
From: omaha
yea its a auto
 
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2008
  #10  
ranger_1999's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,444
Likes: 0
From: spindale, NC
Tell us more, me in particular......What rpm range you run at 65+ and 45???
When you accelerate what RPM range you in also.....Post it up
 
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2008
  #11  
04blackedge's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (13)
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 23,426
Likes: 8
From: Durham, NC
Theres no way you didn't notice any change with 3.73s, I noticed a change going from 29s to 32s and I have 4.10s. I'm sure its doable but its not the same as stock.
 
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2008
  #12  
robert99ranger's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 5,809
Likes: 4
From: Indiana/Mississippi
I went from 27's to 31's and it is noticable with 3.73. Of course though I am running 4 banger power. I was on the interstate Sunday and I had to run it in 4th the whole way cruising at 65 because the wind was so bad. I couldn't run it in 5th.
 
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2008
  #13  
TexasRanger's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,252
Likes: 5
From: austin, TX
im about to go on 33s with 3.73. going to be saving for a new axle with 410s, but that might take awhile. i hope its not too painfully slow
 
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2008
  #14  
Fx4wannabe01's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (23)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 21,721
Likes: 17
From: Boring, Oregon
Originally Posted by Downey
thanks you i have been trying to tell people that for a long time but no one out believe me
what?
 
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2008
  #15  
98liftedranger's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 12,538
Likes: 4
From: California
Well I would call bull**** on this because I went from 28's to 33's with 3.73 gears and my truck was even more of a turd then it already was. So maybe you just don't want to notice a difference. Try to go up a hill that you would normally do in third gear and try that in third again. I bet you won't make it. And start at the same speed you normally would.
 
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2008
  #16  
billabong98z's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis
i have a 2002 3.0 extended cab ranger edge 2wd auto.....seriously guys when accelerateing rarely do i go above about 2800 rpms (mind you i dont know what normal rpms would be), but just saying that the conditions with the 3.73's are not worthy of dropping easily 500 dollars to regear
 
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2008
  #17  
04blackedge's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (13)
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 23,426
Likes: 8
From: Durham, NC
Oh I agree, you can get a 8.8 out of a JY for under 200 with 4.10s
 
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2008
  #18  
99ranger4x4's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 12,198
Likes: 3
From: Austin, TX
I'm about to be running 35s with 3.50s
 
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2008
  #19  
billabong98z's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis
correction to my last post....accelerating as normal from a stop i do not exceed 2400 rpms....and going 45 if i just gun it it will run to about 3000 rpms and then switc gears and settle at about 2300
 
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2008
  #20  
D94R's Avatar
Member
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 731
Likes: 0
From: Lehi, Utah
I'll completely disagree. I went to 33's with my stock 3.73's, with the 4.0 and auto tranny. I didn't notice the big difference until I went back to stock. Then I realized just how much the big tires dogged the truck. Take offs from stoplights are easier on the engine/tranny, accelerating on the highway doesn't take forever to drop gears anymore, and the gas mileage was the BIG difference. I averaged ~14mpg with the 3.73's and 33's. Back to stock I've been getting ~20mpg. The problem was I had to have a heavier foot with the big tires to get moving "like stock", using more gas. I wasted more than the $500 in poor gas mileage than it would cost to get regeared during the year I had the lift and tires.
 
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2008
  #21  
mossyoak03's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 193
Likes: 1
From: Virginia Beach, VA
 
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2008
  #22  
billabong98z's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
From: Indianapolis
theres nothing to call b.s. on...in my opinion its not worth changing gears...the power loss is not sufficient enough to **** away a chunk of money
 
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2008
  #23  
DSFD506's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 704
Likes: 0
From: Anderson, SC
My 3.0 had no problems with 33's and 3.73's. Not too mention I was still getting 22 and 23mpgs in the city.
 
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2008
  #24  
ranger_1999's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,444
Likes: 0
From: spindale, NC
Originally Posted by 99ranger4x4
I'm about to be running 35s with 3.50s
What dont you have 35's now?? and i really doubt you have anything less that 4.56's
 
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2008
  #25  
ranger_1999's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,444
Likes: 0
From: spindale, NC
Originally Posted by DSFD506
My 3.0 had no problems with 33's and 3.73's. Not too mention I was still getting 22 and 23mpgs in the city.
I might have to call BS on this one....Seriously though you averaged 20+ MPG with that ratio...thats great....But im going 4.56 here REALLLLYYY soon
 
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:10 AM.