Mud flaps or no mud flaps????
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From: Anderson, S.C.
AT2's
Originally Posted by 2004FORDRANGER
Better and how do you like your at2's?
Originally Posted by HAZZARDJOHN
Eh, Looks not better or worse to me, but I not as **** about Mud flaps as most people here. I still don't get how it is the first thing you guys are drawn to.
that just shows how old you are...
why would i want a mud catcher that is only half the width of my tires?
Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,262
Likes: 113
From: Costa Mesa, CA
Originally Posted by zabeard
why would i want a mud catcher that is only half the width of my tires?
Yes, I'm old.
Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,400
Likes: 0
From: Wyoming MN
Originally Posted by zabeard
that just shows how old you are...
why would i want a mud catcher that is only half the width of my tires?
why would i want a mud catcher that is only half the width of my tires?
Plus its not just that they don't cover the whole tire, Mine did on my 04 and I still got grief about mud flaps. I am a Big Car guy. I look at cars all day long. I have car magazines coming out of my ear and unless someone mentions it, I have no idea if a car has Flaps or not. I don't even know if my Buick has them or not? I think not, but I honestly don't know. I do know my first one did because I melted it with hot rubber!
~HJ
RF Veteran
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 6,410
Likes: 0
From: Minnesota
as a real oldster(LOL) here, my opinion is this: the mudflaps serve numerous purposes: to keep rocks from flying up into the car behind you and breaking their windshield and to keep your truck from getting all dinged up. also, many states have laws stating that all trucks must have rear mudflaps.
