2.9L & 3.0L V6 Tech General discussion of 2.9L and 3.0L V6 Ford Ranger engines.

Throttle Body Spacer worth it?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 23, 2008
  #1  
Prerunner-Ranger's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Level I Supporter
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,313
Likes: 4
From: Lancaster, CA.
Throttle Body Spacer worth it?

I've been looking around on eBay and came across this TBS for my 3.0

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/01-06...spagenameZWD1V

Is it worth getting? Pros? Cons?
 
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2008
  #2  
whippersnapper02's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,415
Likes: 4
From: Earth, Milky Way Galaxy
Don't waste your money dude. They do nothing.
 
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2008
  #3  
ranger's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,502
Likes: 2
From: Imperial Beach, CA
no
 
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2008
  #4  
Prerunner-Ranger's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Level I Supporter
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,313
Likes: 4
From: Lancaster, CA.
Roger that.
Thanks guys.
 
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2008
  #5  
whippersnapper02's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,415
Likes: 4
From: Earth, Milky Way Galaxy
The goggles do nothing!!!
 
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2008
  #6  
enraged_hunter's Avatar
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, Pa
what are you guys talking about, they work great
















as paper weights
 
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2008
  #7  
mangaki's Avatar
Member
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
From: florence, sc
i got one. my gas went up a little and power is soso.

con about it the brackets they sent werent long enough so when i put the harness back down the wire had some tension on it
 
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2008
  #8  
Yessick's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 842
Likes: 0
From: mobile,Alabama
work good if you have alot of crap done.... becuase theirs so much done it makes you believe its helping...

but it does look nice lol
 
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2008
  #9  
calevra's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
From: breese,ill
sound that they make is well worth it. they whistle like a turbo spooling up. but yeah like i always say if its not an internal motor mod all your doing is making the motors choked up hp become more freed up.
 
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2008
  #10  
whippersnapper02's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,415
Likes: 4
From: Earth, Milky Way Galaxy
Just think for a moment. Throttle body spacers came out when carbs where still used. It helps mix the fuel and air better since it sits right under where the fuel is introduced. If you put it on a fuel injection car it wont do anything since the fuel is added at the back of the intake valves. So the spacer will have no effect on mixing fuel and air. It might work a little on a engine that has a short intake manifold because the extra area from the spacer will add velocity to the incoming air. I though they used to work and I almost bought one but then I read the facts.
 
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2008
  #11  
Shaklakan's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 0
From: La Habra CA
lol yeah they don't really work at all but the sounds not worth 100 or so bucks for some of them. Just put a whistle in your exhaust pipe!
 
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2008
  #12  
Goodysgotacuda's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,496
Likes: 7
From: Las Vegas, NV
Originally Posted by fddriver02
Just think for a moment. Throttle body spacers came out when carbs where still used. It helps mix the fuel and air better since it sits right under where the fuel is introduced. If you put it on a fuel injection car it wont do anything since the fuel is added at the back of the intake valves. So the spacer will have no effect on mixing fuel and air. It might work a little on a engine that has a short intake manifold because the extra area from the spacer will add velocity to the incoming air. I though they used to work and I almost bought one but then I read the facts.
Spacer will lower velocity of the moving air in the intake. Which will require turning more RPM to get use of it, since our engines are no high twisting engines by any means, it's best not to run one. You'll suffer some torque as well.
 
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2008
  #13  
whippersnapper02's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,415
Likes: 4
From: Earth, Milky Way Galaxy
Originally Posted by Goodysgotacuda
Spacer will lower velocity of the moving air in the intake. Which will require turning more RPM to get use of it, since our engines are no high twisting engines by any means, it's best not to run one. You'll suffer some torque as well.
It's lower? I thought since it "adds" more intake manifold that it would add velocity.
 
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2008
  #14  
t3ob's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,762
Likes: 1
From: Olive Branch, MS
man I didn't know some of that information... its times like this when I'm really glad I'm on here :)
 
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2008
  #15  
Goodysgotacuda's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,496
Likes: 7
From: Las Vegas, NV
Originally Posted by fddriver02
It's lower? I thought since it "adds" more intake manifold that it would add velocity.
Well I'm not gonna give a definate 'yes' or 'no' answer since i dont know it all, BUT here is my 2cents on it.

If you add Runner length and decrease the runner diameter some, you will gain in velocity and column the air better twords/into the cylinder. If you increase the intake plentum area, you will lower intake velocity, and increase volume. Because its air thats just kinda floating around until the valve opens, then it has to line up to the runner, and it goes in. Takes more piston speed to get that air moving 'better'.

Mopar 'Long Ram' (long runners = more velocity)...aka TORQUEY and lots of low-end velocity in that manifold
Name:  AUT21754.jpg
Views: 848
Size:  116.9 KB

Tunnel Ram (adding volume to the plentum), great for higher rpm ranges, doggish in the low end rpms.




Just my opinion! Everyone's got one
 
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2008
  #16  
RangerRunner96's Avatar
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
From: somewhere
i say the hell wit these guys cause if ur into rangers and ur itchin for a qiuck, easy and inexpensive mod just buy it and see what happens. every car is different just go for it. i mean what u got to lose it doesn't cost that much. i was in your position and i heard alot of mixed things and i just bought it anyway. the same one your lookin at. i got a 96 ranger 3 liter v6 and its worth 80 bucks.
 
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2008
  #17  
korey89's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,672
Likes: 6
From: South, FL
Absolute waste of money.
 
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2008
  #18  
BRENSRANGER's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,308
Likes: 1
From: Minnesota
i had one did not notice anything
 
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2008
  #19  
zabeard's Avatar
who?
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 26,044
Likes: 10
From: IN
Originally Posted by RangerRunner96
i say the hell wit these guys cause if ur into rangers and ur itchin for a qiuck, easy and inexpensive mod just buy it and see what happens. every car is different just go for it. i mean what u got to lose it doesn't cost that much. i was in your position and i heard alot of mixed things and i just bought it anyway. the same one your lookin at. i got a 96 ranger 3 liter v6 and its worth 80 bucks.
except we have tried it, they do nothing.
 
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2008
  #20  
Stryker's Avatar
Member
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
From: Bakersfield, CA
um... fddriver, how are u gonna put a throttle body spacer on a carb, wen there is no throttle body on a carb? carburetors control the air/fuel mixture. throttle bodies control the amount of air that is mixed. they're the same thing except throttle bodies are on fuel injected engines.
 
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2008
  #21  
whippersnapper02's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,415
Likes: 4
From: Earth, Milky Way Galaxy
Originally Posted by Stryker
um... fddriver, how are u gonna put a throttle body spacer on a carb, wen there is no throttle body on a carb? carburetors control the air/fuel mixture. throttle bodies control the amount of air that is mixed. they're the same thing except throttle bodies are on fuel injected engines.
I think you just answered your own question.

A carb technically does have throttle bodies since it has throttle blades that open with a cable just like the throttle body in a fuel injected car. They just aren't called that. The only difference is how and where the fuel is added.

The point we are trying to make here is that throttle body spacers do nothing for Rangers not the difference between a throttle body spacer and a carb spacer.
 
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2008
  #22  
Stryker's Avatar
Member
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
From: Bakersfield, CA
well adding a throttle body spacer is effectively like re-jetting ur carb.
cuz it changes the air/fuel ratio does it not?
 
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2008
  #23  
korey89's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,672
Likes: 6
From: South, FL
Originally Posted by Stryker
well adding a throttle body spacer is effectively like re-jetting ur carb.
cuz it changes the air/fuel ratio does it not?

 
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2008
  #24  
whippersnapper02's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,415
Likes: 4
From: Earth, Milky Way Galaxy
Originally Posted by Stryker
well adding a throttle body spacer is effectively like re-jetting ur carb.
cuz it changes the air/fuel ratio does it not?
I don't see how they would change a/f ratio by just adding a little more volume to the intake. It might burn slightly learner since you are giving the a/f more time to mix so it burns more completely.
 
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2008
  #25  
SparkYZ's Avatar
Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 679
Likes: 0
From: Granada Hills, CA
Originally Posted by korey89
I literally just LOL'd at that.

Of the three different vehicles I've owned, (Dodge Neon, Ford Mustang and my FX4) every forum has tested these spacers. All of them have had people do dyno runs with them, and all had the same results. ZERO.

Maybe if our motors were revving to 8k RPM and were sucking alot more air, then maybe the spacers would be worth a damn...
 
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:43 PM.