General Ford Ranger Discussion General discussion of the Ford Ranger that does not fit in any other sub-forum.

2010 FORD RANGER **no change** again. . .

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 6, 2009
  #26  
dj wayne's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 737
Likes: 3
From: Ohio
I wouldn't. The 150 looks like a bloated boat to me. I'm very happy with my Ranger thank you.
 
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2009
  #27  
bmfmancini's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
From: brampton ontario
just goes to show you how solid of a truck the ranger is no changes need ***loving my ranger***
 
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2009
  #28  
optikal illushun's Avatar
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,232
Likes: 4
From: Coal Region, MTC to be exact...heart of the coal region.
did the make the tire moniter system standard on the 09 rangers? talk about a PITA when it needs to be reset.

and i agree with the RCS, its a poor system.
 
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2009
  #29  
Sixt9coug's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (7)
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,034
Likes: 1
From: Norwalk, CA
Who really ecpected any major changes anyway? the global one isnt supposed to take over until 2012 or 2013, so enjoy the Ranger as is till then.

im glad i bought my 09 then. No side airbags. I dont like those things anyway.
 
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2009
  #30  
crazymikey's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,008
Likes: 8
From: your mom
yeah really, it's on it's way out, so why spend the money on updates for a year?
 
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2009
  #31  
whippersnapper02's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,415
Likes: 4
From: Earth, Milky Way Galaxy
Originally Posted by bmfmancini
just goes to show you how solid of a truck the ranger is no changes need ***loving my ranger***
Its not really a solid truck. The reason they sell well is because they are cheap. I bought mine because I was poor at the time. Also I picked it up from a Toyota dealer. I wasn't looking for a Ranger at a Toyota dealer.
 
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2009
  #32  
CBFranger's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,029
Likes: 0
From: Tampa Bay Area
Originally Posted by Sonic04Edge
That's just the EPA rating. It's just an avg for all vehicles that fit that criteria. Most of the 2.3's are getting 30ish on the hwy.
BS.

Originally Posted by fddriver02
Its not really a solid truck. The reason they sell well is because they are cheap. I bought mine because I was poor at the time. Also I picked it up from a Toyota dealer. I wasn't looking for a Ranger at a Toyota dealer.
Cheap and reliable.
 
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2009
  #33  
BlutoBodine's Avatar
Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 543
Likes: 3
From: Tulsa, OK
Originally Posted by CBFranger
BS.

On 30+ MPG highway? Might have to call bs on your bs, sorry. 29 MPG here, last summer when my truck was nowhere near being fully broken in with only 2-3k on it and I got that 29 with 75% highway 25% city. With an automatic, and that wasn't granny driving either.
 
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2009
  #34  
GrafixGuy's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,703
Likes: 2
From: Montgomery, AL
if I wanted more room atm I'd buy a Colorado... just saying...

but seriously I'm keeping my ranger I enjoy it too much to sell it
 
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2009
  #35  
dj wayne's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 737
Likes: 3
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by fddriver02
Its not really a solid truck. The reason they sell well is because they are cheap. I bought mine because I was poor at the time. Also I picked it up from a Toyota dealer. I wasn't looking for a Ranger at a Toyota dealer.
I bought my Ranger because a friend of mine had one for a long time with very little maintenance or problems with it. He had about 130,000 miles on his truck, and a friend of his who also had a Ranger had 165,000 on his and both were still running strong. So Rangers being known for getting trouble-free high mileage was a big selling point for me.

I wouldn't call my Ranger cheap, but I'd call it affordable. It certainly isn't built cheap, and has performed very well for me over the last two years that I've owned it.

I also wanted a vehicle built by an American manufacturer.
 
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2009
  #36  
crazymikey's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,008
Likes: 8
From: your mom
Yeah, Rangers aren't built like Kia or Daewoo cheap. Rangers, for their price point in the market I think are a well built truck. I get in mine and it feels like a quality vehicle. I get in my mom's Kia Sportage and I feel like I'm going to break something.

My mom's Kia has about 85 000 miles on it and it's an '01. The rear quarter panels are rotted right through, the hood has a quarter sized rust hole near the hood latch and in the last 8 months, she has spent in the region of $3000 in repairs for a power steering pump, new belts, getting something fixed with the 4wd, and having some electrical problems repaired, and a new blower motor. 85k miles and it's falling apart.

You look at my truck and it doesnt look like it has 250+k miles on it. Only signs of are are peeling paint and surface rust bubbles. You get in it every day and drive it and don't worry about it falling apart around you. IMO, it's a quality vehicle. Yes, the newer ones are slightly cheaper 'feeling', due to cost cutting on plastics and trim and such. But not for one minute do I think of my truck as 'cheap.'
 
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2009
  #37  
Jazz921's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 997
Likes: 0
From: Evansville, IN
Im not giving up my (paid for) Ranger for anything. I wouldnt mind a new one but I looked for a while to get the specific one I have and love the mods that I have done to it. If the engine or tranny go then I will just put another in.
 
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2009
  #38  
Tys 4x4 FTW's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 6,575
Likes: 2
From: Las Vegas, Nevada
the RSC would be cool on the road. but ive been in several near rollover situations off roading. that would be a PITA.
 
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2009
  #39  
01_ranger_4x4's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,585
Likes: 9
From: Muskegon, Michigan
i know everyone elses experiences are different but ive owned rangers ever since i could drive (legally). ive owned rangers of 4 different generations with a combined total of over 700,000 miles on the 4 rangers ive owned, all on origanal motors, one trans in my 86 and a fuel pump. besides normal maintinence ive had no major issues at all. my winter truck (1993 4x4 4.0 5spd) has over 245,000 miles on it and its more trouble free than my 2001 blazer that my wife drives that has less than half the miles on it. i know good maintinence goes a long way and i know every vehicle has its quirks and limitations but my rangers have been a pleasure to own and i will probably always own one. ive watched my friends buy truck after truck (mostly chevys) while my trucks just keep chugging along saving me alot of money. i havent had a truck payment for over 3 years thanks to my "cheap" little trucks. i will be sad when they discontinue the ranger line.
 
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2009
  #40  
dangelj316's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 813
Likes: 0
From: Yuma, AZ
I'm with you on that one. I will be sad when they finally discontinue the Ranger line.

RIP
 
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2009
  #41  
Rolldogg's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,424
Likes: 5
From: Ottawa, Ontario
This always makes me laugh. Seems like everyone is waiting for the Ranger to do some huge conversion or some crazy new radical looks........come on guys you should know better. It took Ford almost 10 years to change the outter look from the box to rounded look, then another 5 to make the changes that led us up to 2000/2001. The little changes made over the past 9 years have been just that, little. They shrunk the powerdome hood, they lowered the 4wd's, they've done away with many of the added features like gap gaurds, cargo lights, and model upgrade packages. I don't know what you expect from Ford of the little Ranger, but it doesn't seem like anything good anytime soon.
 
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2009
  #42  
Melt's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,392
Likes: 2
From: Denver, CO
Originally Posted by dj wayne
I bought my Ranger because a friend of mine had one for a long time with very little maintenance or problems with it. He had about 130,000 miles on his truck, and a friend of his who also had a Ranger had 165,000 on his and both were still running strong. So Rangers being known for getting trouble-free high mileage was a big selling point for me.

I wouldn't call my Ranger cheap, but I'd call it affordable. It certainly isn't built cheap, and has performed very well for me over the last two years that I've owned it.

I also wanted a vehicle built by an American manufacturer.
x2 i originally wanted a tacoma or frontier but saw that my money wasnt gonna get me one of those in good condition, friend of mine had a 96 xcab 4cyl with 200k+ ... called him up and asked honestly what he thought of the truck, he had nothing but good things to say about it and he bought an 07 to replace it .... so hence i got my truck which had what i wanted in my price range
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
2010
General Ford Ranger Discussion
25
Oct 6, 2010 01:11 PM
rngprerunner
Vehicle & Meet Videos
6
May 4, 2010 08:08 AM
buggman
4.0L OHV & SOHC V6 Tech
7
Jan 16, 2010 03:42 PM
zorki1
DOHC - 2.3L Duratec / Mazda L Engines
6
Feb 2, 2009 02:02 PM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:43 AM.