General Ford Ranger Discussion General discussion of the Ford Ranger that does not fit in any other sub-forum.

F150 to Ranger - thoughts?

Old Oct 1, 2007
  #26  
FMD's Avatar
FMD
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,877
Likes: 6
From: Amherst NY
Originally Posted by Virginia Donkey
I wouldn't buy a new Ranger.....find one that is a year old or is a demo. These things depreciate faster than Enron stock

i dunno bout that. the buy out on my truck is $11,000 yet its currentyl selling on the lots for around 15,500 thats the xlt value pkg. 4.0 4x4 2 door rubber floor. and my truck, is a lil more 'classy' cause its actually been waxed in its life time, and its got the leather steering wheel, and cruise. 90% of those selling around here dont have cruise. So, all in all, my truck has gone UP in value. not down.


if your jumping down from a f150 get a 4 door ranger. the 2 doors are ok, but 4 doors are way better, especially if u got issues with u back. and if u get your feet muddy/dirty alot, consider a truck with a rubber floor. i love my rubber floor. no stains, and if u drop ur smoke, its not an instant hole like it with with carpet.
 
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2007
  #27  
Bhavesh's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 507
Likes: 2
From: City, State
imho: keep the F150...it's a better truck

ranger's and gas mileage are a crapshoot...for every 20 rangers, 10 will do awful (about what the F150 does) 5 will be mediocre (16-18mpg) 3 will be acceptable (20ish) and 2 will do fantastic (25-30mpg) and be 2wd/4-cyl/manual

considering that you're getting a 4x4, you'll either have the 3.0 (which, I just ask that you don't) or the 4.0, both of which on a 4x4 will not get great gas mileage

ex:

EPA on the '07 ranger with 4x4/auto/4.0 is 15mpg

EPA on the '05 F150 with 4x4/auto/4.6(or 5.4) is 14mpg

why get the 1mpg if the the ranger will be smaller, less refined, has a V6, etc.?
 
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2007
  #28  
Red_Ak_Ranger's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 17,221
Likes: 4
Originally Posted by FMD
i dunno bout that. the buy out on my truck is $11,000 yet its currentyl selling on the lots for around 15,500 thats the xlt value pkg. 4.0 4x4 2 door rubber floor. and my truck, is a lil more 'classy' cause its actually been waxed in its life time, and its got the leather steering wheel, and cruise. 90% of those selling around here dont have cruise. So, all in all, my truck has gone UP in value. not down.


if your jumping down from a f150 get a 4 door ranger. the 2 doors are ok, but 4 doors are way better, especially if u got issues with u back. and if u get your feet muddy/dirty alot, consider a truck with a rubber floor. i love my rubber floor. no stains, and if u drop ur smoke, its not an instant hole like it with with carpet.
Dude you wish your Ranger was worth 15,500. What a buncha bull.


Mine is worth a heck of a lot more than yours and I bought it for 13K. I think it was marked 14k on lot and that 13k I paid included a 1 year warranty.


I wonder if I have the leather steering wheel though. I know I have the "ballin interior package". Cause umm...its sweet.


And here's *accurate* mpg, taken from fueleconomy.gov


Truck+engine User Average: EPA
Ranger 19.3 14 18
150 4.6 17.4 13 17
150 5.4 16.6 12 16
 
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2007
  #29  
FMD's Avatar
FMD
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,877
Likes: 6
From: Amherst NY
different parts of the country sell vehicals for more or less money depending on where you are.
 
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2007
  #30  
klc317's Avatar
Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 953
Likes: 7
From: Cincinnati, OH
I just checked the values on my Ranger because I am thinking of moving up to an F150. About middle of the road between trade in and retail values, I'm at about 13,000 although it has very low mileage. I can't say the 4.0 is underpowered at all but I have a 4x2 supercab. It's a very fast truck and with the programmer it is alot of fun.
 
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2007
  #31  
Virginia Donkey's Avatar
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: Midlothian, VA
Unfortunately, what the book value is and what you would probably actually get are not going to be the same. I have a 2000 XL sport reg cab A/C, M/T, 4cyl with 100000 miles and in very nice shape and the book retail value is $4900.

How many people do you think would pay 5G for that?

The private party values are the more realistic prices. which on my truck is about $3700....seems about right
 
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2007
  #32  
MonsterGuy's Avatar
Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,907
Likes: 0
From: Haverhill, MA
i am on my 2nd ranger both with 4.0L first was a 96 4.0 4x4 with 218k and ran awesome no probs till lady hit me and now my 99 4.0 4x4 extended 4door off-road package and i love it i just got 19.8mpg going up north to NH about 300miles so its good on highway but city is a lot worse.

my kbb private party value is $7,530 with 125k fully loaded

and i tow a jetski and trailer about 1k LBS and it does awesome towing cant feel its behind you untill you try to stop quick lol.

and i'm 6'3" 230lbs and i have a ton of room to go if needed.
 
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2007
  #33  
klc317's Avatar
Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 953
Likes: 7
From: Cincinnati, OH
Originally Posted by Virginia Donkey
Unfortunately, what the book value is and what you would probably actually get are not going to be the same. I have a 2000 XL sport reg cab A/C, M/T, 4cyl with 100000 miles and in very nice shape and the book retail value is $4900.

How many people do you think would pay 5G for that?

The private party values are the more realistic prices. which on my truck is about $3700....seems about right

My private party value is over $13000.

http://www.kbb.com/KBB/UsedCars/Pric...&Mileage=35100
 
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2007
  #34  
Virginia Donkey's Avatar
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: Midlothian, VA
right...I was responding to FMD. You had said your private party value was about 13K and that is excellent condition. No one gets excellent condition money for a trade in...you should look at the good condition column. Excellent condition means showroom
 
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2007
  #35  
Red_Ak_Ranger's Avatar
RF Veteran
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 17,221
Likes: 4
I remember when the dealer showed me the KBB of my truck. 20K, lol. I might've kept it, ill look for it.


Here's a ****in laugh,

http://www.nadaguides.com/usedcars.a...416&da=-1&nx=1
$18200 For my truck retail
 
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2007
  #36  
rangerxlt4x4's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
From: ohio
I have a 2007 XLT supercab 4d 4x4 4.0l it has good interier room .as long as u keep your foot out of it I get 20 mpg .If i dont i get 15 mpg power is decent. If you dont wont a 4wd you can get an f 150 4x2 with a v6 cheaper and prob. better mpg
 

Last edited by rangerxlt4x4; Oct 22, 2007 at 06:04 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2007
  #37  
Underwear Gnome's Avatar
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
From: Coeburn va
Originally Posted by Lord Of War
Get a 4.0L... if you dont you will hate it. LOL
My 3.0 does what it should, gets to work and home in the winter. Handles what lil bit of off roadin' i do fine. Its slow on the get up and go, but i have no need for the extra power. When that time comes ill look in to an F250 or a Ram.
 
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2007
  #38  
Bhavesh's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 507
Likes: 2
From: City, State
Originally Posted by Red_Ak_Ranger
And here's *accurate* mpg, taken from fueleconomy.gov


Truck+engine User Average: EPA
Ranger 19.3 14 18
150 4.6 17.4 13 17
150 5.4 16.6 12 16
how is this more accurate than what I posted?

1.) the #'s I posted were from fueleconomy.gov
2.) the #'s I posted were for a 2005 F150 (what the OP has) and a 2007 Ranger (closer to what the OP wants to get), not for a 2005 ranger

the "average" EPA gas mileage of a 2005 F150 with the 4.6 is 14mpg (12 city, 16 highway)

http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/calcu...umn=1&id=21161

since the 2008 ranger EPA #'s aren't posted yet, I used the closest values that says the "average" EPA gas mileage of a 2007 Ranger with the 4.0 is 15mpg (14 city, 17 highway)

http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/calcu...umn=1&id=22913

based on EPA #'s the difference in gas mileage is negligible when considering how much bigger and nicer the F150 is

not that it matters because I'm saying 1-2mpg is not a big difference, but you posted '05 ranger gas mileage #'s...the OP is considering an '08 (which according to fueleconomy.gov, actually gets 1mpg worse highway gas mileage than the '05)

yes, there was one "user posted" average of 19.3mpg on the ranger, but that's for a different year ranger (2005), and it was only based on one ranger. predictions on gas mileage are better based on pools of more than one truck. and like I said earlier, rangers and gas mileage are a crapshoot, and roughly 3 out of every 20 rangers I see will do acceptably for gas mileage and the rest do the same, if not worse than EPA...so I'm willing to bet whoever posted 19.3mpg was one of the 3/20, and there's a good chance that if the OP gets an '08 ranger, he's going to get 15mpg or worse
 

Last edited by Bhavesh; Oct 19, 2007 at 11:57 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2007
  #39  
greygooseranger's Avatar
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,297
Likes: 1
From: SE Michigan
^^^ I don't buy that sh*t... I get 20+ mpg all the time with my 4.0 SOHC. My father has a Yukon Denali that he consistently gets 18+ mpg. its all how you drive and how you take care of it. Heck the lifted guys on here say they get 15-16 mpg average with a SOHC, and thats on 35's!!!
 
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2007
  #40  
Matt3203's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
From: phenix city, alabama
i got 160k miles on my 3.0 and not ONE problem mith my engine or transmission!! it outruns my friends ranger 4.0(haha) and i get 20+mpg easy more like 25mpg!!
 
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2007
  #41  
drarkansas's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
From: Fort Walton Beach, FL
I traded my 2004 FX4 S/C F150 back in on a 2005 Ranger FX4. I miss the interior space, but that's about all. The Ranger doesn't get that much better gas mileage than the 150, but gas station trips are a lot less when you're filling up 19.5 gallons vs. 27+.
 
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2007
  #42  
Bhavesh's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 507
Likes: 2
From: City, State
Originally Posted by greygooseranger
^^^ I don't buy that sh*t... I get 20+ mpg all the time with my 4.0 SOHC. My father has a Yukon Denali that he consistently gets 18+ mpg. its all how you drive and how you take care of it. Heck the lifted guys on here say they get 15-16 mpg average with a SOHC, and thats on 35's!!!
I'm not saying single rangers don't get good gas mileage. I'm saying a pool of 20 or more rangers won't average good gas mileage.

If you get 20+mpg, my guess is you're part of the lucky 15% that get acceptable gas mileage w' a ranger. Another 25% will do mediocre, 50% does crappy, and 10% do worse than V8's twice their size

Originally Posted by Matt3203
i got 160k miles on my 3.0...and i get 20+mpg easy more like 25mpg!!
you don't have the 4.0 and yours is 2wd...of course it's going to get better gas mileage than a 4.6L 4wd F150

the OP wants to get a 4wd 4.0 ranger; I'm just saying it's very likely he won't get much better gas mileage than his F150
 
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2007
  #43  
Matt3203's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
From: phenix city, alabama
Originally Posted by Bhavesh

you don't have the 4.0 and yours is 2wd...of course it's going to get better gas mileage than a 4.6L 4wd F150

the OP wants to get a 4wd 4.0 ranger; I'm just saying it's very likely he won't get much better gas mileage than his F150
if you read the orginal post he wants to know bout the comparision between 05 f-150 and a 08 ranger 4x4 not once does he say hes lookin for a 4.0 so your wrong read before you talk!
oh and i am 4wd
 

Last edited by Matt3203; Oct 21, 2007 at 11:09 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2007
  #44  
grt08's Avatar
Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: Paso Robles,Ca
I have the 08 xlt 4x4 Auto. 4 dr and have yet to get less than 18 mpg on California gas, with my best to date at 20.3 mpg. I normally run at 70ish mph on the highway.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
theelcaminoman
General Ford Ranger Discussion
12
May 24, 2011 04:25 PM
RazorsEDGE
Ford Snapshots & Videos
13
Feb 14, 2010 11:50 AM
haymaker546
General Ford Ranger Discussion
5
Mar 2, 2008 08:43 AM
bjohn
General Ford Ranger Discussion
7
Jun 27, 2006 01:31 AM
Huh?
General Ford Ranger Discussion
13
Feb 3, 2006 09:23 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:02 AM.