Hey did you knpow that Ford made a Ranger with a 5.4 V8 in it factory!!!??? LOL
i think it was a joke cause he did a 5.0 swap
Well technically the Lightning bolt ranger is a factory truck because they used all stock parts to my knowledge, meaning if you broke a part you could order a stock f150 whatever and it would fit right in. very little modifications were made too it. granted they only made one ,and they should have put the v8 in it but then it takes away from all the guys that worked hard and knew what they were doing putting a v8 in thier rangers if some newbie could just walk up to a dealer and order one.
Yes that guy is full of crap... lol my friend always BS's me saying his Sameri with stock everything and 31" tires still gets 30 MPG even with the little 1.3L motor. Or that his dodge can pull off 28 with him romping it. or the fact that he said he could do 85 in 3rd gear at only 2500 rpm's in his moms mustang. BSers are out there and most of us are smart enough to not believe them.
Yes that guy is full of crap... lol my friend always BS's me saying his Sameri with stock everything and 31" tires still gets 30 MPG even with the little 1.3L motor. Or that his dodge can pull off 28 with him romping it. or the fact that he said he could do 85 in 3rd gear at only 2500 rpm's in his moms mustang. BSers are out there and most of us are smart enough to not believe them.
Well technically the Lightning bolt ranger is a factory truck because they used all stock parts to my knowledge, meaning if you broke a part you could order a stock f150 whatever and it would fit right in. very little modifications were made too it. granted they only made one ,and they should have put the v8 in it but then it takes away from all the guys that worked hard and knew what they were doing putting a v8 in thier rangers if some newbie could just walk up to a dealer and order one.
Yes that guy is full of crap... lol my friend always BS's me saying his Sameri with stock everything and 31" tires still gets 30 MPG even with the little 1.3L motor. Or that his dodge can pull off 28 with him romping it. or the fact that he said he could do 85 in 3rd gear at only 2500 rpm's in his moms mustang. BSers are out there and most of us are smart enough to not believe them.
Yes that guy is full of crap... lol my friend always BS's me saying his Sameri with stock everything and 31" tires still gets 30 MPG even with the little 1.3L motor. Or that his dodge can pull off 28 with him romping it. or the fact that he said he could do 85 in 3rd gear at only 2500 rpm's in his moms mustang. BSers are out there and most of us are smart enough to not believe them.
29" rear tires, .68 5th gear and 2.73 rear end 1:1 4th gear, forget what 3rd was...
sadly, the mustang gears aren't actually that far off, mine, i can do over 200 km/h in 3rd gear i believe it was... i know 4th gear topped out at 245km/hish (153mph) and 260 (160mph) is 3500 rpm in 5th gear
29" rear tires, .68 5th gear and 2.73 rear end 1:1 4th gear, forget what 3rd was...
29" rear tires, .68 5th gear and 2.73 rear end 1:1 4th gear, forget what 3rd was...
His moms stang is like an 06 with the 4.0L and whatever gearing...
oh ya that would make a difference... mine is an 89 5L LX hatch back, with the hiway gears (2.73's) they also came with 3.08's 3.23's 3.65's? and i think you could get 3.73's i know they were popular, not sure if they were stock though... i know 4.10's were common, but i am 90% sure were not stock in any way shape or form, i knew a guy who had an early 80's stang, with 4.11's and he claimed they were stock, but i don't know
lol, 3.73's he would probably be doing 3500 rpm in 5th at 60mph... i did 2500rpm at about 65-70 in 5th with my 2.73's, i'm pretty sure the trans gears are different though, my 4L(ranger), is .78 5th
Yeah... I know he was cause he is a constant BS'er. lol
I love the guy but its annoying when he exaggerates, I mean I exaggerate from time to time but its obsured, but he trys to convince people its true. IDK we all have idiots in our lives lol
I love the guy but its annoying when he exaggerates, I mean I exaggerate from time to time but its obsured, but he trys to convince people its true. IDK we all have idiots in our lives lol
I love people that try to pull that crap, it gives me a good laugh and story to tell later. Its even better when they try to tell you how something works and its something you know inside and out. In that case I just let them finish and then correct everything they said, its great to leave them with a dumb look on their face
I love people that try to pull that crap, it gives me a good laugh and story to tell later. Its even better when they try to tell you how something works and its something you know inside and out. In that case I just let them finish and then correct everything they said, its great to leave them with a dumb look on their face 

not meaning to 1-up ya...
The lightning bolt Ranger did in fact have a supercharged 5.4 in it, but it was only a concept vehicle.
PickupTruck.Com - First Drive: Ford SVT Lightning Bolt Ranger
PickupTruck.Com - First Drive: Ford SVT Lightning Bolt Ranger
CONCEPT's are always BADAZZ...............then the political part of the manufacturer steps in and boom, it's gone!

Couldn't build a SWEET BADAZZ truck like the Lightning Bolt Ranger and have it whoop a Mustang's azz!!!
Last edited by 94Ranger355; Jan 4, 2010 at 06:52 PM. Reason: spellin
#1 reason the SHO package on the taurus was dialed down, and cost $10 000, the origional concept was cheap, and faster than the 5.0's
yeah my high school band director was like that, so full of ****, he claimed stuff like his stock '78 Dodge Coronet could keep up with Ferraris if he filled the tank with acetone and crap like that. And he once drove from the west coast to the east coast in 24 hours and **** like that
f the 5.4 grow some ***** and drop a cummins in that puppy
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BBqWFTxFQ0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BBqWFTxFQ0
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




